Lorraine Kelly Nude Pictures ~ Real or Fake?

[monkey65]

I used to work in a retouching studio (not as a retoucher but an account manager), I have seen enough retouching to know real or not, I have to say these look very very real!!

[peepcreep]

Originally Posted by gs1

to me the standing up one looks fake,
the head doesnt look right in proportion or colour to the torso

In addition, notice the necklace, a commonly used prop to hide a join, is pristine compared to the weathered condition of the rest of the photo.

[minky951]

Originally Posted by gs1

Here are the infamous pics,
to me the standing up one looks fake,
the head doesnt look right in proportion or colour to the torso
hard to say.
make your own mind up

To quote the X Fies "I want to believe"

It would be interesting to know her age in the stockings pics and maybe see a legit clothed photo from the same era for comparison. Her boobs seem to have filled out with maturity if seeing is believing? Although the same phenomena commonly occurs post childbirth. Pity the necklace is such an easy target for photoshoppers. It won't stop me wanting them to be true!

[ed345]

I have been making fakes for years, and if these pics are fake, they are the best I have ever seen, by a mile

[peterpops]

I agree with ed354,ive also been faking for years,and i pretty much know all the tricks of the trade and i would stake my reputation on these being real.They were probably taken when lorraine was in her late teens before becoming a celebrity.The inset picture shows the teeth to be the identical in both the suspect photo and in the real Lorraine.These pictures are not digital but optical scans,ie before the advent of digital cameras.Even more proof is to be had by the fact that the two different body poses are of the same person...not very common in fakery.Also if you zoom in using photoshop you cannot see a single suspect pixel.These are the real mc'coy alright.I always wondered what our Lorraine would look like unwrapped,now i know.

[quixote63]

I first saw these pictures many years ago, can't be much off ten posted on a celebrity site...they aint changed...I have always believed them to be the real thing.

[akane]

The story i was told by a friend who works for a photo agency was a guy bought a house and had builders in to renovate the upstairs bedrooms.
When the builders pulled up the floor boards they found the photos and gave them to the owner thinking they were his which they were not.
He thought they looked like lorraine and when he asked the old owner he said she use to live there, anyway he destroyed the photo's but unknown to him the builders had kept a few for themselves and those are posted in post 1.

[effiefan]

Agreed. And if I'm wrong I still want it to be her!

[mitchspur]

Always poo pooed it myself. But I'm beginning to agree more and more they're real. Isn't it true she didn't deny or confirm it either?

[snuffrider]

I downloaded these files from the alt.binaries.tv.shaggable.babes USENET group back in 2000 and these are as originally posted. I can’t remember all the details of how they were found but the story was that the photos were found in an old house by a friend of the poster.

There was a mass debate in the group (chortle) about whether the photos were real or not. Again, I can’t really remember all the reasons but if you look closely the freckles on her tits and neck appear to match up with recent photos. Also the images to me look like if they were taken in the early to mid 1980s (the colour of the walls and the duvet).





Anyway I’ve always thought they were real. Enjoy.