Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Classic Celebs, Beauty & Elegance > Classic Celebrities > Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Our Live Cams Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes.


View Poll Results: The nude pictures
They are of Lorraine 468 75.73%
They are of a lookalike 96 15.53%
They are fakes 54 8.74%
Voters: 618. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2008, 10:31 PM   #11
monkey65
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 0
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
monkey65 0
Default

I used to work in a retouching studio (not as a retoucher but an account manager), I have seen enough retouching to know real or not, I have to say these look very very real!!
monkey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to monkey65 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-01-2008, 11:22 PM   #12
peepcreep
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 291
Thanks: 205
Thanked 6,132 Times in 435 Posts
peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+peepcreep 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gs1 View Post
to me the standing up one looks fake,
the head doesnt look right in proportion or colour to the torso
In addition, notice the necklace, a commonly used prop to hide a join, is pristine compared to the weathered condition of the rest of the photo.
peepcreep is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to peepcreep For This Useful Post:
Old 11-21-2008, 10:26 AM   #13
minky951
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
Thanks: 22
Thanked 110 Times in 25 Posts
minky951 500+minky951 500+minky951 500+minky951 500+minky951 500+minky951 500+
Wink Just could be...???

Quote:
Originally Posted by gs1 View Post
Here are the infamous pics,
to me the standing up one looks fake,
the head doesnt look right in proportion or colour to the torso
hard to say.
make your own mind up

To quote the X Fies "I want to believe"




It would be interesting to know her age in the stockings pics and maybe see a legit clothed photo from the same era for comparison. Her boobs seem to have filled out with maturity if seeing is believing? Although the same phenomena commonly occurs post childbirth. Pity the necklace is such an easy target for photoshoppers. It won't stop me wanting them to be true!
minky951 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to minky951 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-24-2008, 04:56 PM   #14
ed345
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Thanks: 114
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
ed345 0
Default

I have been making fakes for years, and if these pics are fake, they are the best I have ever seen, by a mile
ed345 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ed345 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-25-2008, 06:51 PM   #15
peterpops
Junior Member
 
peterpops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Posts: 8
Thanks: 116
Thanked 153 Times in 8 Posts
peterpops 500+peterpops 500+peterpops 500+peterpops 500+peterpops 500+peterpops 500+peterpops 500+
Default

I agree with ed354,ive also been faking for years,and i pretty much know all the tricks of the trade and i would stake my reputation on these being real.They were probably taken when lorraine was in her late teens before becoming a celebrity.The inset picture shows the teeth to be the identical in both the suspect photo and in the real Lorraine.These pictures are not digital but optical scans,ie before the advent of digital cameras.Even more proof is to be had by the fact that the two different body poses are of the same person...not very common in fakery.Also if you zoom in using photoshop you cannot see a single suspect pixel.These are the real mc'coy alright.I always wondered what our Lorraine would look like unwrapped,now i know.
peterpops is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to peterpops For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2008, 04:32 PM   #16
quixote63
Junior Member
 
quixote63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Thanks: 303
Thanked 48 Times in 4 Posts
quixote63 100+quixote63 100+quixote63 100+
Default Got to agree

I first saw these pictures many years ago, can't be much off ten posted on a celebrity site...they aint changed...I have always believed them to be the real thing.
quixote63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2008, 06:21 PM   #17
akane
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 62
Thanks: 608
Thanked 560 Times in 89 Posts
akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+akane 2500+
Default

The story i was told by a friend who works for a photo agency was a guy bought a house and had builders in to renovate the upstairs bedrooms.
When the builders pulled up the floor boards they found the photos and gave them to the owner thinking they were his which they were not.
He thought they looked like lorraine and when he asked the old owner he said she use to live there, anyway he destroyed the photo's but unknown to him the builders had kept a few for themselves and those are posted in post 1.
akane is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to akane For This Useful Post:
Old 11-27-2008, 06:30 PM   #18
effiefan
Vintage Member
 
effiefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mordor; closing time.
Posts: 595
Thanks: 21,606
Thanked 16,063 Times in 625 Posts
effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+effiefan 50000+
Default

Agreed. And if I'm wrong I still want it to be her!
__________________
I post therefore I am.
effiefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2008, 10:15 PM   #19
mitchspur
Vintage Member
 
mitchspur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porn, Music & Football Corner
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 3,195
Thanked 41,182 Times in 3,524 Posts
mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+mitchspur 175000+
Default

Always poo pooed it myself. But I'm beginning to agree more and more they're real. Isn't it true she didn't deny or confirm it either?
mitchspur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 08:58 PM   #20
snuffrider
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
Thanks: 56
Thanked 419 Times in 16 Posts
snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+snuffrider 1000+
Default original pics

I downloaded these files from the alt.binaries.tv.shaggable.babes USENET group back in 2000 and these are as originally posted. I canít remember all the details of how they were found but the story was that the photos were found in an old house by a friend of the poster.

There was a mass debate in the group (chortle) about whether the photos were real or not. Again, I canít really remember all the reasons but if you look closely the freckles on her tits and neck appear to match up with recent photos. Also the images to me look like if they were taken in the early to mid 1980s (the colour of the walls and the duvet).





Anyway Iíve always thought they were real. Enjoy.
snuffrider is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to snuffrider For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 PM.