Innocent Images

**MaxJoker** · 09-18-2009, 01:54 PM

Have decided to start up this thread because hands down the more respectful types of images towards women are the ones i find most attractive . Not that the rest don`t have their rightful place of course , and i`m not acting a sex snob. Especially as i`d seem a hypocrite given this is predominantly a porn site. Just for me full on pornographic photos aren`t to my tastes.

Hey what can i say ?, i embarrass easily

So if you have any tasteful images of ladies please post them here

**kananga** · 09-18-2009, 02:50 PM

You mean something like this?
Think this meets most criteria.

Attractive = check
No visible "wool", as you put it = check

I suppose now you'd prefer pictures of actual women?

**kananga** · 09-18-2009, 05:37 PM

... Real women are much more immodest!

I seem to have a lot of images that are the exact opposite!

Partially clothed women who are still extremely expicit.

**kananga** · 09-20-2009, 04:38 AM

Very nice GS. I also noticed about a third weren't technically naked!

and one wasn't even full figure!

Makes it kinda hard to follow the rules when the goalposts keep moving.
Parameters are important to us blonde folk!

We do have the ability to "think outside the box".

Although, usually not for long.

**Greenman** · 09-20-2009, 04:26 PM

Problem is we now seem to have come full circle-in the 70's you have that photographer/film-maker Harrison whatsisname taking photos of say Margaret Nolan without showing any bush-not that she had any to begin with, then you have P*boy shots of glamour which then in direct competition with P*House started to show a bit more bush(because they had some) yet still keeping the innocent look. I think it was Flynt who started H*ust*er made it more erotic, which was then copied here by sleazemeister David Sullivan and Paul Raymond(although he was more innocent than Flynt)-after that the demand for more pics that were once described as " more masturbatory" by Linzi Drew were taken. Magazines changed and became a lot more like the US American-strength magazines. Now we have gone back to the almost showing all or showing a hell of alot but nothing covering it as it were-the Brazilian replaced the natural look. Personally I think the natural look is a lot better and back then it was more about glamour.

Smallmouth · 09-21-2009, 05:45 AM

I like these as well. As I'm sure you know, a lot of these are from 1960s-era Pl@yb*y magazines.

For myself, I think the appeal and turn-on stems from two things: 1, these are the photos and mags (plus early seventies stuff) I came of age with. 2, The models, while beautiful, have a girl-next-door look... like someone you might actually meet, date, etc. It's like, "hey, this could really happen !" I don't get that from more modern porn... and I certainly don't know (or want to know) women who would act like today's porn stars do!

**marlon** · 10-11-2009, 08:32 AM

**marlon** · 10-26-2009, 08:39 PM

Retrophile · 10-27-2009, 12:26 AM

The innocence seems to be fading too much into the background, these days. Here's to keeping it alive..

**marlon** · 11-07-2009, 11:00 AM

09-18-2009, 01:54 PM	#1
MaxJoker I Beg To Differ Sir ..... Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cemetery Gardens_Arterial Blood Lane_Rampton Secure Unit_Extra Violent F Wing_Cell 19 Posts: 12,704 Thanks: 84,865 Thanked 173,060 Times in 13,788 Posts	Innocent Images Have decided to start up this thread because hands down the more respectful types of images towards women are the ones i find most attractive . Not that the rest don`t have their rightful place of course , and i`m not acting a sex snob. Especially as i`d seem a hypocrite given this is predominantly a porn site. Just for me full on pornographic photos aren`t to my tastes. Hey what can i say ?, i embarrass easily So if you have any tasteful images of ladies please post them here __________________ My hypocrisy only goes so far

09-18-2009, 02:50 PM	#2
kananga Moderator Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Downunda Posts: 2,517 Thanks: 27,466 Thanked 24,769 Times in 2,772 Posts	Like This? You mean something like this? Think this meets most criteria. Attractive = check No visible "wool", as you put it = check I suppose now you'd prefer pictures of actual women? __________________ the Rules

09-18-2009, 05:37 PM	#3
kananga Moderator Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Downunda Posts: 2,517 Thanks: 27,466 Thanked 24,769 Times in 2,772 Posts	I've Come to a Startling Conclusion that... ... Real women are much more immodest! I seem to have a lot of images that are the exact opposite! Partially clothed women who are still extremely expicit. __________________ the Rules

09-20-2009, 04:38 AM	#4
kananga Moderator Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Downunda Posts: 2,517 Thanks: 27,466 Thanked 24,769 Times in 2,772 Posts	Very nice GS. I also noticed about a third weren't technically naked! and one wasn't even full figure! Makes it kinda hard to follow the rules when the goalposts keep moving. Parameters are important to us blonde folk! We do have the ability to "think outside the box". Although, usually not for long. Last edited by MaxJoker; 09-20-2009 at 04:55 AM.. Reason: Explain in proceeding post :-)

09-20-2009, 04:26 PM	#5
Greenman Former Mod/80's Page 3 Enthusiast Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: An attic in England Posts: 12,772 Thanks: 21,067 Thanked 182,967 Times in 14,497 Posts	Problem is we now seem to have come full circle-in the 70's you have that photographer/film-maker Harrison whatsisname taking photos of say Margaret Nolan without showing any bush-not that she had any to begin with, then you have Pboy shots of glamour which then in direct competition with PHouse started to show a bit more bush(because they had some) yet still keeping the innocent look. I think it was Flynt who started Huster made it more erotic, which was then copied here by sleazemeister David Sullivan and Paul Raymond(although he was more innocent than Flynt)-after that the demand for more pics that were once described as " more masturbatory" by Linzi Drew were taken. Magazines changed and became a lot more like the US American-strength magazines. Now we have gone back to the almost showing all or showing a hell of alot but nothing covering it as it were-the Brazilian replaced the natural look. Personally I think the natural look is a lot better and back then it was more about glamour. __________________ There is only ONE Greenman, accept no substitutes! "If I should die, think only this of me...I'll be back to get ya!" Blackadder Goes Forth

09-21-2009, 05:45 AM	#6
Smallmouth Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 57 Thanks: 371 Thanked 1,086 Times in 79 Posts	I like these as well. As I'm sure you know, a lot of these are from 1960s-era Pl@yb*y magazines. For myself, I think the appeal and turn-on stems from two things: 1, these are the photos and mags (plus early seventies stuff) I came of age with. 2, The models, while beautiful, have a girl-next-door look... like someone you might actually meet, date, etc. It's like, "hey, this could really happen !" I don't get that from more modern porn... and I certainly don't know (or want to know) women who would act like today's porn stars do!

10-11-2009, 08:32 AM	#7
marlon Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Up on the roof Posts: 8,571 Thanks: 43,745 Thanked 234,005 Times in 10,315 Posts	__________________ Full VEF Rules GD&N Posting Rules “I don't think it's the nature of any man to be monogamous. Men are propelled by genetically ordained impulses over which they have no control to distribute their seed.” *Marlon Brando*

10-26-2009, 08:39 PM	#8
marlon Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Up on the roof Posts: 8,571 Thanks: 43,745 Thanked 234,005 Times in 10,315 Posts	__________________ Full VEF Rules GD&N Posting Rules “I don't think it's the nature of any man to be monogamous. Men are propelled by genetically ordained impulses over which they have no control to distribute their seed.” *Marlon Brando*

10-27-2009, 12:26 AM	#9
Retrophile Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 72 Thanks: 474 Thanked 1,825 Times in 86 Posts	The innocence seems to be fading too much into the background, these days. Here's to keeping it alive..

11-07-2009, 11:00 AM	#10
marlon Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Up on the roof Posts: 8,571 Thanks: 43,745 Thanked 234,005 Times in 10,315 Posts	__________________ Full VEF Rules GD&N Posting Rules “I don't think it's the nature of any man to be monogamous. Men are propelled by genetically ordained impulses over which they have no control to distribute their seed.” *Marlon Brando*

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode