Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Information & Help Forum > Help Section > Scanning Feedback

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Our Live Cams Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2010, 01:40 AM   #1
bushw1ck
Senior Member
 
bushw1ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: new york
Posts: 217
Thanks: 3,625
Thanked 6,839 Times in 237 Posts
bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+bushw1ck 25000+
Default Help Me Select A Color Balance Setting (HP Scanjet 4570c)

Having trouble arriving at a robust color setting for my HP 4570c and hoping for some calibration help. To make matters even more confusing I'm running a G4 PPC running Mac OSX 10.4.11 that was formatted for Region 2 DVD and the system displays PAL color by default.

The scanner has ALWAYS produced results that skew the colors into the red and always look oversaturated when compared to similar images produced on different systems even before I reformatted to Region 2 about a year ago. So traditionally when scanning for myself I usually knock the saturation level down to 90% and then bump the color balance into the yellow then green a notch. Here is an example of the results using those settings using the sweet & pretty Jonelle from H*stl*r May 1986 as a subject:



and then the same page scanned using the default auto color balance:



I actually prefer the more muted colors in the first example but am not sure if what I am seeing on my screen is the way the picture actually looks & would like to find a color balance setting that everyone can enjoy. Thanks!

Last edited by bushw1ck; 05-09-2010 at 01:57 AM..
bushw1ck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bushw1ck For This Useful Post:


Old 05-12-2010, 07:07 AM   #2
cooljcb
Vintage Member
 
cooljcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The 1980's
Posts: 886
Thanks: 29,916
Thanked 29,088 Times in 993 Posts
cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+cooljcb 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bushw1ck View Post

I actually prefer the more muted colors in the first example but am not sure if what I am seeing on my screen is the way the picture actually looks & would like to find a color balance setting that everyone can enjoy. Thanks!
I prefer the second scan. The first seems very flat and has a slight misty look to it. The second has more depth.
__________________
They say Blondes have more fun.....but Redheads taught them how.

.....[..........
cooljcb is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cooljcb For This Useful Post:
Old 05-12-2010, 08:50 PM   #3
tuffy
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 542
Thanks: 217
Thanked 8,414 Times in 475 Posts
tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooljcb View Post
I prefer the second scan. The first seems very flat and has a slight misty look to it. The second has more depth.
My message is off-topic.

Do you have a 3D-screen ? (I'm only joking)

Some days ago I watched a Panasonic 3D-tv with 3D-glasses. It was the biggest event in my life watching a television.
I saw pictures from Grand Canyon and from Rome, they were unforgettable. I saw the depth 2 meter from the screen forward and then 10 to 600m in depth from the screen backward, I can never forget what I saw!

It's amazing that you saw depth on the second picture. (which is more correct than the first one)

I tested some HDMI cables the last week, and I sade exactly the same about an Audioquest HDMI-3 cable, it has correct and vivid colors, high contrast and I saw some depth in studio pictures.

Tuffy
tuffy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tuffy For This Useful Post:
Old 05-12-2010, 09:31 PM   #4
tuffy
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 542
Thanks: 217
Thanked 8,414 Times in 475 Posts
tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+tuffy 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bushw1ck View Post
Having trouble arriving at a robust color setting for my HP 4570c and hoping for some calibration help. To make matters even more confusing I'm running a G4 PPC running Mac OSX 10.4.11 that was formatted for Region 2 DVD and the system displays PAL color by default.

The scanner has ALWAYS produced results that skew the colors into the red and always look oversaturated when compared to similar images produced on different systems even before I reformatted to Region 2 about a year ago. So traditionally when scanning for myself I usually knock the saturation level down to 90% and then bump the color balance into the yellow then green a notch. Here is an example of the results using those settings using the sweet & pretty Jonelle from H*stl*r May 1986 as a subject:

and then the same page scanned using the default auto color balance:

I actually prefer the more muted colors in the first example but am not sure if what I am seeing on my screen is the way the picture actually looks & would like to find a color balance setting that everyone can enjoy. Thanks!
I have an old HP 5370c scanner and I use HP PrecisionScan Pro 2.51 software with it.

First I do an Auto Exposure Adjustment which I correct manually. (I use Highlight Alarm and Shadow Alarm to manage the clipping)

Second I use the Auto Color Adjustment manually. Then I repeat them.

Because I'm using a PC, I'm using Midtones 2.2 (Gamma = 2.2)

Please observe that the HP scanners are adjusted for the correct skin tones, which give a little red color cast.

Color correction can everybody do in Photoshop, but you must be an expert to get good result.

After 15 years with Photoshop I let the scanner to do this job for me to spare time.

Your scans are flat, they have low contrast as the magazine has, but the the first picture has a strong yellow color cast.

I prefer the second picture.

Tuffy
tuffy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tuffy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-11-2010, 02:48 AM   #5
Dekoda
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 824
Thanks: 21
Thanked 15,065 Times in 826 Posts
Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+
Default

Hi bushw1ck! First, let me say that I never make adjustments in the scanning software. The reason is because once you do that, the scan you end up with has been adjusted and it's difficult to make any other adjustments. If the scanning software made incorrect adjustments, you can't undo them.

Also, I am not a fan of anything that Apple makes....especially their computers, but that's just me. If you are happy with your computer, then that's all that matters.

If you just use the default settings on your scanner, you end up with a scan that hasn't been tampered with by the scanning software. If you are using Photoshop, you can adjust the scan to look it's best. I have found that that is the way to get the best results.
Dekoda is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dekoda For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2010, 10:26 PM   #6
Xxphd
Former Staff
 
Xxphd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,045
Thanks: 40,625
Thanked 49,321 Times in 5,974 Posts
Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+Xxphd 250000+
Question Value for money

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dekoda View Post
Also, I am not a fan of anything that Apple makes....especially their computers, but that's just me. If you are happy with your computer, then that's all that matters.
The Mac he is using is about 10 years old.. just try that with any out of the box PC from that era..

__________________

Ha.. Ha.. Hatchoo!

Xxphd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 01:35 AM   #7
Dekoda
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 824
Thanks: 21
Thanked 15,065 Times in 826 Posts
Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+Dekoda 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xxphd View Post
The Mac he is using is about 10 years old.. just try that with any out of the box PC from that era..


I did back then....I still preferred the PC over the Mac.
Dekoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 09:59 AM   #8
tmee2000
Veteran Member
 
tmee2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Straya
Posts: 2,426
Thanks: 48,003
Thanked 27,503 Times in 2,667 Posts
tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+tmee2000 100000+
Default

I prefer the second picture, it has a deeper look to it. I would always retain the original scan though, then you can experiment with the contrast and colour depth.
tmee2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:56 PM.