|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Vintage Erotica Maximum date of the content allowed to be posted here is 1995. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
February 22nd, 2012, 09:00 AM | #3171 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 770
Thanks: 926
Thanked 22,913 Times in 771 Posts
|
Quote:
The utterly superb: Dukes of Stratosphear - Chips from the Chocolate Fireball - (Google it) I know I'm off-topic here but I'm hoping that I've got myself a little credit with the moderators. btw....next posting will be a Bearsden Trio comprising all I have of Anne Scott, Helen Brodie/Milligan, Ruth Cavendish, Anne & Ruth and Helen & Ruth. |
|
February 22nd, 2012, 09:46 AM | #3172 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 78
Thanks: 250
Thanked 826 Times in 77 Posts
|
Quote:
But the monochrome photos, pretty girl-next-door models, and the accidental-on-purpose flashes of stockings and suspenders epitomise the innocence of the whole series of publications - and evoke with great nostalgia the furtive flicking of pages with a pal who used to nick them from his elder brother's hiding place! molegogger |
|
February 22nd, 2012, 11:56 AM | #3173 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 770
Thanks: 926
Thanked 22,913 Times in 771 Posts
|
Bearsden Trio.
These three Scots girls did various solo shoots, and also did some pick'n'mix with each other. I've compiled all 445 images I have of these girls into their various shoots and tried to put them into order where possible. L-R. Anne Scott & Ruth Cavendish, Anne Scott, Helen Brodie & Ruth Cavendish, Helen Brodie, Ruth Cavendish. As usual, rather than post all the images together, I have put them all into a 38mb file and it is available for download here: https://rapidshare.com/files/3806211...rsden_Trio.zip Kudos to all the other posters and scanners. |
The Following 41 Users Say Thank You to manowar1952 For This Useful Post: | auster, baldeagle, |
February 22nd, 2012, 12:31 PM | #3174 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 72
Thanks: 936
Thanked 570 Times in 73 Posts
|
I'm not saying modern glamour pictures don't necessarily work on their own terms - sometimes they do. With the right clothes, poses, hair and makeup and the right girl I expect you could recreate those style of 50s-60s pictures. But I've yet to see it.
|
February 22nd, 2012, 11:43 PM | #3175 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
February 23rd, 2012, 08:08 AM | #3176 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 122
Thanks: 84
Thanked 1,825 Times in 121 Posts
|
There is a huge site out there (won't name it except say Pin-Up is part of the title) which attempts to do just that. Technically it's faultless and the models are all very pretty. But it's totally studio bound and comes across as completely artificial.
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to tocofan For This Useful Post: |
February 23rd, 2012, 09:33 AM | #3177 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 770
Thanks: 926
Thanked 22,913 Times in 771 Posts
|
Quote:
There is no soul in those images but it's what younger viewers, who didn't live through the time of real nylons & suspenders (hose & garters to our American friends) back in the 50’s & 60’s, are perceiving as being sexy....and good luck to them....because they'll never know the thrill of catching real glimpses of frillies & stockings when going about their daily routine. It's very much like the older codgers (me) looking back to the footballers of the same period and comparing them to the powder puffs playing today with their lighter balls & gore-tex strips....utterly soul-less, and in most cases, goal-less. I totally put the blame on the demise of stockings & suspenders as normal wear down to Mary Quant and her Carnaby St designer friends for making the mini the 'costume de rigueur' and killing off nylon stockings as normal wear stone-dead…to be replaced with tights (panty-hose). She may be lauded today as a fashionista icon but not in my presence. The girls appearing in ToCo and similar pocket publications were, apart from the starlets & professional models, young housewives making some pin-money to supplement their income and pay the rent in their flats and bed-sits. Most would do a solo shoot (usually in the ToCo offices)...and that was it, possibly because of embarassment, or in case their families found out. Some found it easy and did more shoots after the initial office one and then did lots of outdoor shoots...I'm thinking of models like Jill Lucienne, Lamorna Lea, Anne Duke, Susan Douglas, Nicky Taylor, Marie Graham and those Bearsden Girls who made a short career that seemed to go on for longer because of the many photographs that were taken and the fact that long afterwards, in some cases ten or fifteen years, ToCo would continue to use images from the old archives to pad out the magazines from the very late sixties to the mid-seventies when they ceased production. The girls appearing today in the pseudo-spick & span sites are for the most part being 'issued' with real nylons which are not their everyday wear....and that's the difference....the original girls who lifted their skirts, slips and petticoats to show us their stockings, panties & suspenders would drop them and still be wearing them when they left the ToCo offices…because those were their ‘real clothes’. They were the girls you walked behind going up the stairs at Tube stations, or up the steps to the Embankment or walked up or down office stairs where one could look up and see through the steps to the real thing. Last edited by manowar1952; February 23rd, 2012 at 09:31 PM.. |
|
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to manowar1952 For This Useful Post: | danton, donside, hobohemian, hydon, JGW, jomama, Knickers1, Lazza, Medium2, milroy, nattaruk, ozprof, Rob the diver, sevket, tigertank, trailmaster, xttgoqja8, YokohamaJo |
February 23rd, 2012, 01:30 PM | #3178 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 72
Thanks: 936
Thanked 570 Times in 73 Posts
|
Quote:
Manowar is exactly right - in those days the models were showing us their everyday lingerie (probably their best set) whereas nowadays these young women are clearly not used to wearing stockings and suspenders in their everyday lives and treat them as 'sexwear'. As has been said before in a previous thread the original ToCo models really were 'the girl next door',with pretty smiles or appealing slightly embarrassed expressions, not the blank-faced bored-looking 'models' of today. Moreover these days younger women-and the not so young- seem to have no experience of wearing stockings or tights at all, apart from black opaques in colder weather. Oh, and Mary Quant and her like haven't aged well - trendy 60s 'dollybirds' don't... Last edited by hobohemian; February 23rd, 2012 at 02:17 PM.. |
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to hobohemian For This Useful Post: |
February 23rd, 2012, 05:52 PM | #3179 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 142
Thanks: 6,765
Thanked 1,093 Times in 130 Posts
|
Quote:
I love a lot of their stuff for what it is and the beautiful models especially; but yes, sometimes I do wish there was something more ToCo-like around. |
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to TheDogThatDidntBark For This Useful Post: |
February 23rd, 2012, 09:05 PM | #3180 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
You chaps really have summed it all up so succinctly. Toco's models were "real" girls for me and the style of posing was saucy, cute but charmingly innocent. Nicola, Marie and many of the others were simply in a league of their own. Nick
Last edited by Knickers1; February 24th, 2012 at 06:26 AM.. |
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|