|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Mystery Corner Here you will find the Mystery Boxes containing the older unsolved requests. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
June 11th, 2014, 12:53 AM | #1 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 617
Thanks: 2,926
Thanked 5,620 Times in 494 Posts
|
[Unfolded Mystery] Cassie
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=183
Cassie http://www.indexxx.com/models/44676/cassie/ http://www.indexxx.com/set/525176/simonscans-cassie/
__________________
|
|
June 11th, 2014, 10:45 PM | #2 |
avvie pic by Estreeter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 13,737
Thanks: 109,422
Thanked 182,651 Times in 13,045 Posts
|
It's a little difficult to call this an unfolded mystery when the info is the same as is in the original mystery post. Should we leave this one open for a bit longer?
__________________
I no longer have time to upload videos, sorry.
|
June 12th, 2014, 03:55 AM | #3 | |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,129
Thanks: 226,701
Thanked 356,690 Times in 21,624 Posts
|
Quote:
To me it's almost like it's more difficult when we already have a handle (regardless of whether it comes in one or two parts), because then we're looking for any other or a better known as handle, but if nothing turns up then we seem to just keep on waiting & hoping. I don't wish to muddy the waters by bringing in a different model, but I do so here merely as an example to illustrate a concept: Elizabeth Johnson. There we have a two-part name from a mag. whose names we've used many times before--even though they're probably no more "reliable" than other mags.--but we leave her in MIR because we started out looking for any other names, & having failed to find one within random time period x, we continue to hold out the hope that if we wait a bit longer, something might turn up. Does MIR need some time limits for models where we already have a partial handle? OK, EJ is a bit different from Cassie because of the 2-part name business. In Cassie's case instead of a second name we have an index site entry. Maybe instead of a fixed time limit (too arbitrary), perhaps whenever we come to this sort of a question: should/shouldn't we, then if we decide on a "no" for now then a time limit should immediately be imposed: if nothing more gets added for her in the next x months, then we change our initial "no" to a "yes" & release her from MIR--because such a release sometimes may trigger just the sort of additional info. that we were waiting for but not getting inside MIR? /shrug/ Just another (stray) thought. Last edited by effCup; June 12th, 2014 at 04:18 AM.. Reason: grammar |
|
June 12th, 2014, 04:20 AM | #4 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 617
Thanks: 2,926
Thanked 5,620 Times in 494 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|