Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > Vintage Erotica

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Vintage Erotica Maximum date of the content allowed to be posted here is 1995.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2009, 09:24 PM   #681
manowar1952
Vintage Member
 
manowar1952's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 763
Thanks: 926
Thanked 20,528 Times in 771 Posts
manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+manowar1952 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Medium2 View Post
........Love the ones, with tights, of course. Anyone got any more of those?.........




manowar1952 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 09:01 PM   #682
fondueset
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
fondueset 0
Default

I'm new here. Thanks to all the generous contributors.
I have a theory. It was 1968 as I recall, when women began wearing tights. Up till then most women wore suspender belts or girdles as day-to-day items of clothing, but after that they became bedroom wear for the benefit of us chaps. It seems to me that in the later S&S pix many of the girls are wearing what you might call a "bedroom" suspender belt, no more than some frilly elastic, whereas in the earlier pictures they wore "proper" suspender belts which an adventurous youth might reasonably expect to encounter in his early fumblings. I believe that the S&S photographers had to supply the suspender belts after 1968 and that many of the pictures feature the same flimsy example.
fondueset is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fondueset For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2009, 10:59 AM   #683
Medium2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 357
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,109 Times in 331 Posts
Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+
Default

Interesting. It would intriguing to know how much of the clothing the photographers supplied. I know that the editors were quite specific in how they wanted the girls to pose (or so Ken Howard told me). That presumably applied to regulars like Ken who tended to be in every issue. Maybe less so to guys who sent in the odd one or two pics 'on spec'. I had a conversation with a guy quite a few years ago who saw a girl in the park and suggested that he take some pics of her for the Toco mags. This she agreed to and they did three or four sessions togther. Not sure you could approach women in the same way these days!

It would be great to get anyone who contributed to Toco to join in with this thread!
Medium2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Medium2 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-22-2009, 02:53 PM   #684
ozprof
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 130
Thanks: 1,994
Thanked 1,427 Times in 121 Posts
ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+ozprof 5000+
Default

I too have wondered about this. On more than a few occasions I have noticed that the girls are wearing the same underwear and stockings, and sometimes the background is the same, yet the rest of their outfits are different. eg some photos have them wearing a dress and some have them in skirt and blouse.

Cheers

Ozprof
ozprof is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ozprof For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2009, 11:27 PM   #685
pigskin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Thanks: 289
Thanked 22 Times in 5 Posts
pigskin 100+pigskin 100+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grdssdrg View Post
More Donna Sharp - a real cutie. Hope you guys like her too.

This is all I've got of Donna so if by any chance you have any more . . . . .


A girl, stockingtops and a Mini with outside door hinges and radial tyres Happiness

Last edited by pigskin; 09-23-2009 at 11:30 PM..
pigskin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to pigskin For This Useful Post:
Old 09-24-2009, 02:06 AM   #686
20late
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 208
Thanks: 2,155
Thanked 1,837 Times in 143 Posts
20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+
Default Dirty Laundry

Quote:
Originally Posted by fondueset View Post
I'm new here. Thanks to all the generous contributors.
I have a theory. ... I believe that the S&S photographers had to supply the suspender belts after 1968 and that many of the pictures feature the same flimsy example.
No doubt the majority of garter belts, stockings and panties were supplied by publishers or photographers - who I'm sure would buy them in bulk and in sizes from one or two suppliers.

For one thing, what girl would willingly want to wear underwear someone else had worn (even if laundered)?

Second, the cost of equipping 30 or so models per year is pretty minimal given the overall sales of 6 or 12 issues per year.

Third, there's the esthetics of the image itself - certain designs work much better for the purpose of photography and men's "interest" than others. If you want to make money selling photos and magazines, you gotta give the public what it wants - simple business economics.
20late is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 20late For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2009, 10:09 AM   #687
will
Vintage Member
 
will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,727
Thanks: 11,159
Thanked 302,103 Times in 7,155 Posts
will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+
Default

The divine Cheryl Peters I know these are not from S+S but the thread name is Girls of the old Spick and Span and she is one of them, If anyone objects to them being here I will move them.

will is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 10:20 AM   #688
will
Vintage Member
 
will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,727
Thanks: 11,159
Thanked 302,103 Times in 7,155 Posts
will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+will 1000000+
Default

The same for Mel Cooper
















will is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 06:20 PM   #689
cheech47
Vintage Member
 
cheech47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 585
Thanks: 5,652
Thanked 17,277 Times in 576 Posts
cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+
Default Jane Paul

Following Will`s excellent posts above, these pics of the lovely Jane/Joan
are from an old Parade mag but she is very much a S/S girl.




CC
cheech47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 06:38 PM   #690
cheech47
Vintage Member
 
cheech47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 585
Thanks: 5,652
Thanked 17,277 Times in 576 Posts
cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+cheech47 50000+
Default Dawn, June and Wendy

While I`m at it here are some more from Parades of 1968.



Once again, all three were Toco regulars.

CC
cheech47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.