|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 11th, 2011, 11:48 PM | #31 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Down at the "Y"
Posts: 33,073
Thanks: 390,390
Thanked 1,111,768 Times in 36,682 Posts
|
I once brought this subject up regarding my displeasure of actresses who refuse to do nude scenes in movies and the use of body doubles, sexual scenes or otherwise, on another forum thread and I practically got my ass reamed out sideways by a number of members who disagreed with me!
It is my feeling and contention that movie stars, whether they be male or female, get paid very big bucks for their appearances in movies, and I don't believe that it is asking too much that they do their own nudity in the film. Most actually will get compensated extra and quite handsomely when nudity is required of them in a movie. The body double does all the "dirty work" and the actress gets all the accolades! If an actor/actress is offered a movie role knowing that nudity will be required and are unwilling, uncomfortable, or refuse to comply, then they should not take the role or do the movie. I agree with the many comments that love scenes/sex scenes in movies have become so fake, untrue-to-life, and ridiculous looking these days ... being wrapped up in the sheets like mummies while presumingly making love! They will spend millions of dollars to film/produce a movie in attempting to make it true-to-life, then ruin it with ridiculous and fake-looking love scenes, obvious body doubles, and overlooking some obvious details. One such detail that has bugged me for years is when, let's say a man and woman are stranded some place for days/weeks/months and the woman's underarm or leg hair never grows! I suppose she has her Lady Schick battery-powered razor handy in her purse/pocket ... and often times the man's facial hair does not grow as well -- he must have borrowed her Lady Schick! I think Hollywood spends far too much money and concentrates far more on some of those really absurd-looking and totally unbelievable stunts and special effects (which makes for another good topic), than concentrating and paying attention to some of those smaller details which provides more realism to a movie. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to cuzzyman927 For This Useful Post: |
October 12th, 2011, 12:05 AM | #32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Down at the "Y"
Posts: 33,073
Thanks: 390,390
Thanked 1,111,768 Times in 36,682 Posts
|
Just a wild hunch, but perhaps 10-20 years later, and seeing what actresses/actors get paid these days, they more than likely shot her a figure that she couldn't refuse -- especially more so if it happens to be an actress/actor who has not received many movie/part offers during that time period. That old saying "money talks" is often very true, and when the price is right it will often rid some actresses/actors of their inhibitions and ideals rather quickly.
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to cuzzyman927 For This Useful Post: |
October 18th, 2011, 05:19 PM | #33 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 31
Thanks: 255
Thanked 127 Times in 22 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to crazeyhorse For This Useful Post: |
October 18th, 2011, 11:48 PM | #34 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3
Thanks: 9
Thanked 14 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SGNY For This Useful Post: |
October 24th, 2011, 04:09 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13
Thanks: 12
Thanked 39 Times in 8 Posts
|
I adore Aniston but she's becoming a complete fucker for this kind of thing. Early reports saying that her long-awaited scene in Wanderlust will be predominantly CGI'd in, including nips.
My patience is running out Jen. So is your fucking career. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to n3ss8j8 For This Useful Post: |
October 24th, 2011, 04:25 PM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Thanks: 312
Thanked 106 Times in 14 Posts
|
Probably the best discussion thread ever!!
Which is Actors (or more specifically actresses) have a duty to get their kit off to ensure their art is authentic Couldn't agree more - but it's not going to happen. Also I suspect most of us couldn't give a damn about the plot as long as they their tits out. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to miltoncc_uk For This Useful Post: |
October 25th, 2011, 02:10 PM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 50
Thanks: 244
Thanked 774 Times in 48 Posts
|
You know, if it wasn't bad enough actresses not baring the goods in roles that practically demand it, we now have the advent of the CGI nips and arses.
I know it only really applies to big budget films that cast perennial teasers but when the technology is getting so good you can't tell the difference (Alba fake shower scene) and only find out in the DVD extras or when someone lets it slip in an interview its enough to make you give up. You could always spot a body double because of the way the film is edited but those days appear to be over, the day of the CGI body double is here. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CaptainYfronts For This Useful Post: |
October 25th, 2011, 07:59 PM | #38 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 62
Thanks: 167
Thanked 3,183 Times in 63 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to evilbovine For This Useful Post: |
October 27th, 2011, 02:57 AM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 489
Thanks: 22
Thanked 3,916 Times in 467 Posts
|
One more reason to think Kevin Smith is an idiot.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lurk_D For This Useful Post: |
October 29th, 2011, 03:22 PM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 42
Thanks: 1,246
Thanked 956 Times in 43 Posts
|
Great thread, agree with pretty much every comment so far
I'd add Natalie Portman to the teaser list for the nude scenes filmed during Closer that got destroyed, and for describing her sex scene with Mila Kunis in Black Swan as "It's not raunchy, it's extreme". My idea of 'extreme' involves dwarves, live animals and hot wax, not something my dear departed grandmother would find tame. Regarding nipple-covering and sheet-taking, maybe that's not so untrue to real life all the time. I had an ex who hated exposing her nipples during sex or at any other time because they were (very slightly) hairy... my assurances that it was okay, mine are too, didn't help for some reason. Many years ago I also had a drunken one-night fling with a Scots girl who was, for want of a better phrase, morbidly obese. I was quite glad when she took the sheet with her when she got up the next morning. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to j1mmy For This Useful Post: |
|
|