January 10th, 2010, 01:12 AM | #101 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 372
Thanked 33 Times in 4 Posts
|
The photoshoot pages stick together and have micro-holes in them, last time I checked PB. They also seem thinner and more easily creased. change this.
Also super frustrating is showing spreads across two pages - make them horizontal or a fold out. Also don't crop out models feet. Include a clear face on full frontal bare breasted shot of celebs who shoot. That's artistic! More shoots that have the vibe of the 60s and 70s shoots - less glossy more natural light. More casual shots. More interesting insights into the girls. If you interview a girl right she's super interesting. More casual nudes throughout the magazine. there shouldn't be dozens of pages like a literary magazine or bogus FHM style. Better more radical cultural articles like in the 60s and 70s. More natural beauties. More creative set ups for pictorials. Find more cool artists to do cartoons. Recruit a new breed of culturally savvy people plus the sexy 60's and 70's inspired aesthetic. Its just lack of imagination that keeps the magazine from being a talking point. It has the brand name and position to do huge things. |
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Hp33 For This Useful Post: |
January 29th, 2010, 07:09 PM | #102 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,458
Thanks: 3,509
Thanked 29,466 Times in 1,452 Posts
|
HUgh out ot touch
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to gwhh For This Useful Post: |
January 29th, 2010, 07:38 PM | #103 |
Gusset Man & Jizzmaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wanking, but not the city in China
Posts: 2,043
Thanks: 5,200
Thanked 34,730 Times in 2,027 Posts
|
Frankly, the magazine is been surpassed on the cheesecake front by other magazines, and has run out of interesting people to interview. Yes, I did use to read PB for the articles - after all, only around 10% of the content was naked girls and I could always do my monkey spanking to something like Club. So let's be honest - the magazine is pretty much fucked, and no attempt to improve matters - more fake tits, harder photoshoots, whatever - will save it.
The Playboy brand however is going from strength to strength - which is rather unfortunate as it is no longer an adult brand - as it should be - but one that is being foisted on young girls that don't know any better. I am a fan of porn, yes - but I believe Playboy is an outdated monster that has left its real mission - to entertain adult males - long behind.
__________________
"Birth Control Tip #2431: Shoot your load in a girl's mouth or on her face instead of inside her sweet bits. Result: no expensive burden, stretch marks or saggy tits". To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sharkhunter For This Useful Post: |
January 29th, 2010, 11:24 PM | #104 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 13,387
Thanked 6,316 Times in 1,013 Posts
|
offer the loyal subscribers a taste of the PB luxury and invite them to parties at the mansion
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to chupachups For This Useful Post: |
January 30th, 2010, 03:14 AM | #105 |
緑の男
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Jockistan, UK.
Posts: 8,318
Thanks: 39,032
Thanked 122,438 Times in 8,318 Posts
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to otokonomidori For This Useful Post: |
January 30th, 2010, 04:07 AM | #106 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
|
I'm totaly agree, now Playboy suck. I think Playboy need new blood with fresh idea. Hefner is to old for this era.
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to saruman13 For This Useful Post: |
January 30th, 2010, 04:22 AM | #107 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Behind the Decks
Posts: 1,902
Thanks: 5,342
Thanked 45,325 Times in 1,892 Posts
|
Playboy has become way too commercial, one of my neighbours has a tarted up citreon saxo in gold and it has the Playboy logo on it in black on the front bumper and both side panels..Twat lol
__________________
Please read the Forum To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to groovesection For This Useful Post: |
January 30th, 2010, 06:25 AM | #108 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 97
Thanks: 9
Thanked 694 Times in 95 Posts
|
I subscribed for a year or two back in the 90's (only because they offered a massive discount on an already low subscription price), and the only other one I bought was a few years back, and only because it had an interview with Bettie Page (I didn't even get it for the pics! LOL). I don't know if it's worth saving...
__________________
You will always be missed, sweet Bettie. You will live in our hearts forever.
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Extempus For This Useful Post: |
January 30th, 2010, 07:32 AM | #109 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 144
Thanked 14,339 Times in 1,702 Posts
|
Not having read through all the posts, apologies if I'm repeating someone else's point.
There's an enormous archive if Playmate images dating way back, some of which would have been considered too explicit at the time.These would be sought by fans of the models. |
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to knobby109 For This Useful Post: |
February 1st, 2010, 11:51 PM | #110 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,223
Thanks: 9,493
Thanked 19,342 Times in 1,145 Posts
|
Better women
I was looking through the new posts yesterday and came upon this. Isn't she amazing. I've put it my desktop background because I was so taken by this image.
Liz has been a favourite of mine since I first discovered her many years ago and this image of her shows what a true beauty she is. This is going to be a little difficult to explain, but I have always had this idea about degrees of beauty. Walking down the street I sometimes see a girl in the distance who looks stunning, but not beautiful in my eyes. I take stunning to mean eye catching. They are dressed sexily and their hair is beautiful. But they are lacking in that something which makes me find them truly beautiful. This is what I think of the recent CFs. Some of them are not even stunning, just ordinary. Compare them to Liz or some of the other real beauties of the past and there is no competition. Do women like this still exist or does PB just go for a particular bland type? Maybe its because it was my formative period, but I can still remeber all (I think) the CFs from that era and further into the past. A current CF could pass me in the street and I wouldn't know. They don't have anything that makes them stand out from the crowd. Instantly forgetable. Change this downward spiral and PB may have a future.
__________________
Meet To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. my avatar. Last edited by RyderKnightley; February 2nd, 2010 at 12:19 AM.. |
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to RyderKnightley For This Useful Post: |
|
|