CSV List - The definitive KK Photo Story, Magazine Story & Film Story data

[icu]

Originally Posted by fannatastic

Here are some details of various... (...) ...Any comments?

I hope that all Clusters are single autonomous CSV-Objects for us ( .A, .P, .M, .R , etc... )
and we don't have to create endless entries.

[icu]

Originally Posted by retro man

Update for post #89 - SB - Sex Bizarre

Originally Posted by retro man

attempt №2 - update for post #90
TC - Transexual Climax

Thanks retro man, that is a great job. I hope the CSV-Editor runs better now and you did not loose many time by my error.

Updates solved - I exchanged the complete Lists : 'SB' (#89), 'TC' (#90)

[Al Gebra]

Originally Posted by Rob4

guys

your working way too fast for me... full time job and kids and all that...

Same here.

@ Rob4
If you agree I'll ask Dub to create a new thread in the 'Model ID Request' section named the definitive kk model identification thread (official sets). Then he could transfer the posts listed in your message #150 plus posts #68 - #70 to the new thread. You will stay thread starter. Dub will delete the messages you also mentioned in #150. After the transfer is done you can continue working on your new thread immediately.

@ all
I agree with fannatastic's suggestion to start a new thread (CC data in CSV format) in 'Vintage Erotica Talk'. We can still use this thread (the definitive kk identification thread) as long as needed. After that it would be best to continue working in CC data in CSV format and to delete the definitive kk identification thread to avoid confusion.

What do you think?

[icu]

@Al :

I totally agree. This Thread should be our 'Toolbox' with special
Themes which could confuse or frustrate other Members.

@All :

Please write a Post if you want to work on a List.
All the others see the Status, it is to prevent from double Works.
I don't modify the List until you give your ok.

[Al Gebra]

Originally Posted by icu

@fannatastic, Al:

Let us handle this Theme please.
I agree that we have the Chance to correct some unknown Mistakes before a perhaps possible
'Run on the Thread' starts. Shall we leave the old CSV in this case ? I think is plausible.

As far as I'm familiar with collection CSVs the CSV maintainer always tries to reflect the website he is working on. So it is most likely that some of the early sets - when they were first released - were sorted in other categories than they are nowadays. I get more and more the feeling that the 'sets' reflect the old sets being sorted nowadays. So if we keep the file naming 'month/year' for the early sets we should also keep the 'old' categories for historical reasons - even if they might be "wrong" to us.

If I understand fannatastic correctly he wants to delete 'category'. In this case we don't need to discuss on this subject anymore.

PS: icu, can you provide the source of your 'sets', please?

[fannatastic]

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

As far as I'm familiar with collection CSVs the CSV maintainer always tries to reflect the website he is working on. So it is most likely that some of the early sets - when they were first released - were sorted in other categories than they are nowadays.

I agree.

I get more and more the feeling that the 'sets' reflect the old sets being sorted nowadays. So if we keep the file naming 'month/year' for the early sets we should also keep the 'old' categories for historical reasons - even if they might be "wrong" to us.

If I understand fannatastic correctly he wants to delete 'category'. In this case we don't need to discuss on this subject anymore.

PS: icu, can you provide the source of your 'sets', please?

I think we could keep the CC Category for now.

Just don't spend too much time worrying if they are right or wrong and don't change them to what we think they should be. Of all the data, CC Category is the least important.

[fannatastic]

.P, 0397d, SB, Golden Orgy, 21, SB44.2,
.P, 0497a, SB, Peeing For the First Time, 20, SB47.2,
.P, 0597h, SB, A Wet Duet, 22, SB41.2,
.P, 0697h, SB, Exciting Showers, 24, SB49.3,
.P, 0997h, SB, Gay Girl Game, 20, SB57.1,
.P, 1097e, SB, Paris Piss Addicts, 18, SB57.2,
.P, 1197i, SB, Amber Champagne, 21, SB57.4,
.P, 17d, SB, Pee Addicts, 20, SB50.4,
.P, 18f, SB, Urine Game, 22, SB50.1,
.P, 25b, SB, Golden Wine, 22, SB64.2,
.P, 33e, SB, Wet Lust, 21, SB65.1,
.P, 37c, SB, Urine Love, 22, SB65.2,
.P, 38f, SB, Kinky Lovers, 22, EX64.3,
.P, 43c, SB, Thirsty People, 23, SB46.2,
.P, 52j, SB, Urine Game, 22, SB68.1,
.P, 54g, SB, Forbidden Desire, 22, SB70.1,
.P, 56a, SB, Thirsty Girl, 22, SB69.2,
.P, 58d, SB, Golden Rain, 22, SB69.1,
.P, 60b, SB, Golden Holiday, 22, SB70.2,
.P, 62g, SB, Lewd Lucy, 22, SB70.3,
.P, 64c, SB, Wet Weekend, 22, SB69.3,
.P, 66g, SB, Kinky Orgy, 22, SB68.4,
.P, 68a, SB, Special Lusts, 22, SB68.3,
.P, 70e, SB, Wet Triangle, 22, SB71.1,
.P, 74b, SB, Urine Lust, 22, SB71.2,
.P, 76d, SB, Kinky Desires, 22, SB71.4,
.P, 80c, SB, Power Of Piss, 22, SB72.4,
.P, 82e, SB, Wet Weekend, 22, SB72.1,
.P, 84i, SB, Kinky Game, 22, SB72.2,
.P, 90m, SB, Golden Maid, 22, SB68.2,
.P, 92i, SB, Wild And Kinky, 22, SB66.3,
.P, 94g, SB, Golden Game, 22, SB46.1,
.P, 98l, SB, Golden Sex Girls, 22, SB48.2,
.P, 104f, SB, Kinky Fun, 22, SB64.4,
.P, 108j, SB, Hot Piss Fun, 22, SB66.1,
.P, 110f, SB, Piss Sisters, 22, SB46.3,
.P, 118e, SB, Wet-Sex Artist, 22, SB47.4,
.P, 122n, SB, A Pissy Trick, 22, SB40.3,
.P, 124l, SB, Lesbian Piss, 22, SB65.4,
.P, 129e, SB, Wet-Sex Workers, 22, SB40.2,
.P, 131j, SB, Learning About Piss, 22, SB47.1,
.P, 132k, SB, Kinky Lady, 22, SB44.3,
.P, 138f, SB, Paying For Piss, 22, SB48.1,

SB68.2 could be a reprinted story, not the original (set 90m)

[icu]

'SB' - Update solved.

[fannatastic]

Originally Posted by icu

Hi, I'm on again.
I agree, perhaps it could be useful to reserve a Place in one of the Top-Posts for all following VB-Scripts, Setups and Helpfiles als Download Links.

Agreed. Post #206 now updated.

Originally Posted by icu

I hope that all Clusters are single autonomous CSV-Objects for us ( .A, .P, .M, .R , etc... )
and we don't have to create endless entries.

Yes, first field will be different for different types of data, so that everything could fit in one big CSV file!

[icu]

I am currently writing a Update-Tool which makes it save and quick for me to update your Works to the Lists.

Do we need the ID-Table longer ?
All Infos are copied to the Lists. It is double Work to update this List.
If you confirm I remove the Conent from the Post to prevent Errors.