WORST films you`ve ever seen EVER !

[Historian]

Originally Posted by Jazz Man

No, not that one....this one:



based on the old classic British TV series. Dire in all respects.

I'm sure I've seen worse on late night TV, but without a doubt, by a massive margin the worst thing I've ever actually paid money to sit in a cinema and watch. The really sad thing, is that in theory, the ingredients were there for something at least half-decent- film version of a classic TV series, stellar cast - but no, it was totally, utterly crap in every respect

Put it this way, when even the sight of Uma Thurman in skintight black leather can't make it remotely watchable, you know you've got a real turkey on your hands....

[bigone7]

The Libertine with John Dep was the worst ever I even had to translate the scrip so my girlfriend could understand it. Acting was poor. The next was Red Dawn 2

[MaxJoker]

That be the first film Cusack`s appeared in that I've absolutely snore fest disliked



Wasn't anything to do with the guy himself though as he did his very best with the minimal mediocre screen time and lame lousy lines he was given.



By this demented loved up directing dweeb



A man so on the pulse unaware of what makes a watchable movie, he even hired the same Minnie mouse voiced talentless woman to appear on screen and do the tedious narration.



What a genius .

[Sir Honkers]

I don't know if Into The Woods is the worst film I've ever seen, but it doesn't do much with what could have been a really good idea. Someone should make Marshall, Lapine and Sondheim sit down and watch 'Once More With Feeling' to see it done properly.

[whiteboypussy]

Originally Posted by teejay83

I've had some bad experiences at the cinema - the one that comes to mind right now is Cloverfield. I didn't think there was anything to the whole getting nauseous from shaky cam business until I saw that rubbish (I had no problem with Blair Witch). A terrible gimmick, cardboard characters...I've had nothing to do with JJ Abrams since.

But JJ didn't make Cloverf, he only produced it.

[Dropped52]

I have to say I liked Cloverfield, I thought it was pretty decent as far as sci-fi goes. The only thing I disliked was the choice for main charters but I did like t.j. miller, the narrator, and lizzy Caplan. Plus Jj Abrams has made some pretty good stuff including the new star trek films and the upcoming star wars. Now on the other hand a real piece of shit associated with this film was it's porn counter part cleavage field that was a real steamer.

[boobalu]

The Hunger games
From Dusk to Dawn
Heat

So much plotless garbage these days, it's hard to say one is worse than another

[ManofKent]

Originally Posted by Dropped52

I have to say I liked Cloverfield, I thought it was pretty decent as far as sci-fi goes. The only thing I disliked was the choice for main charters but I did like t.j. miller, the narrator, and lizzy Caplan. Plus Jj Abrams has made some pretty good stuff including the new star trek films and the upcoming star wars. Now on the other hand a real piece of shit associated with this film was it's porn counter part cleavage field that was a real steamer.

I have to agree with this. I went to see it at the cinema and I actually quite enjoyed it.

I agree with what a lot of people have said about it, in that compared to a lot of Big Monster movies Cloverfield's greatest strength is the sense of MYSTERY about it.
Like the characters in the story, we have no idea what this thing is or where it came, and the nature of existence and origins is what makes it so interesting.

I do understand not everyone's a fan, though. I remember when it came a journalist in the Daily Mirror (I think it might have been Brian Reade) slammed it has a piece post-9/11 American propaganda made on behalf of Hollywood.
His argument being this:

"Let's look at the facts, shall we?

*A large, powerful unseen enemy launches an unprovoked attack on New York City? Check!
* Scenes of Skyscrapers collapsing into the streets below in rubble and dust? Check!
* Thousands of screaming running American citizens running from the aforementioned dust and rubble of the collapsing building? Check!
* The American armed forces putting up a valiant armed defense of an enemy that they see has an extreme danger to the country and the American Way of Life? Check!
* And to top it off the enemy desecrates the Statue of Liberty (an icon of the American nation in the eyes of it's patriotic citizens). Check!."

Has much as I like it, I can see his argument somewhat of it having social commentaries about 21st Centaury global Terrorism (and 9/11).

[hattertim]

Originally Posted by boobalu

The Hunger games
From Dusk to Dawn
Heat

So much plotless garbage these days, it's hard to say one is worse than another

The Hunger Games? I've only seen the first one, and it's fair to say I'm not it's target audience, and Battle Royale did this kind of thing better (and more violently), and I've got to agree that the plot was a bit rubbish.

But From Dusk Till Dawn? I assume you mean the 1996 movie with George Clooney? An all-time classic this one, so can't agree with you there! And it's not exactly recent either!

And Heat? If this is the 1995 Al Pacino/Robert de Niro crime caper movie, then although I've not seen it (yet), surely a movie that gets 8.3 out of 10 on the IMDb can't be all bad? However, if it's The Heat, the Sandra Bullock movie from 2013, then you may be right! But it's got Sandra Bullock in...which is probably more than enough to redeem many a bad movie!

So in a battle to win which is worst, it's got to be the Hunger Games!

[hattertim]

Originally Posted by MaxJoker

That be the first film Cusack`s appeared in that I've absolutely snore fest disliked

So not a movie based on this, then...



Obviously that's where they went wrong!