[MB Followup] Young "Policewoman", early 90's

[birdman_london]

Originally Posted by deezer

Please note: If a Mystery followup is yet established, post all new info to that thread.
The Mystery followup thread is linked in the box-post, so you can't miss it. I will move your post to the existing thread.

Please note: I'm asserting (through detailed personal knowledge of British models of the period) that this thread is solved (not merely being followed up), so I followed the instructions for "unfolding a mystery" (i.e., the second section) to the letter, I believe.

With respect, after four years blessed with a full name for her and without contrary evidence, anyone disputing my contention is pushing against an open door while asking me to prove a negative: that there isn't a 'better' name out there somewhere. (Btw, "Wren"s were members of the erstwhile (British) Women's Royal Naval Service, and the origin of the name adopted here by the clever-clogs magazine editor as this 'naval' girl's 'surname-de-porn'.)

Regards, birdman

[deezer]

You read the instructions as you say, but you probably didn't catch the meaning. Otherwise you would have posted new info in the yet existing thread.
It would have been ok, if you would have bumped the existing followup-thread, with: "IMO this thread could be solved, because of this and/or this reason (or because of my outstanding, brilliant and detailed personal knowledge)".

But you preferred to create a new thread and you added nothing, which wasn't known in the existing thread.

Nobody is disputing your detailed personal knowledge and expertise.
And nobody disputed your contention.
You just didn't follow the protocol, therefore I moved your post to the existing thread.

End of discussion.

If you have further questions, write me a PM.

[birdman_london]

Originally Posted by deezer

You read the instructions as you say, but you probably didn't catch the meaning. Otherwise you would have posted new info in the yet existing thread.
It would have been ok, if you would have bumped the existing followup-thread, with: "IMO this thread could be solved, because of this and/or this reason (or because of my outstanding, brilliant and detailed personal knowledge)".

But you preferred to create a new thread and you added nothing, which wasn't known in the existing thread.

Nobody is disputing your detailed personal knowledge and expertise.
And nobody disputed your contention.
You just didn't follow the protocol, therefore I moved your post to the existing thread.

End of discussion.

If you have further questions, write me a PM.

Have it your way, Deezer; no need to mock me (if our positions were reversed you could be sanctioned for that), nor for a PM. As I said on another thread to Dick Needle, my "outstanding, brilliant and detailed personal knowledge" predicts you'll be overruled eventually. #JennyWrenRules