|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Classic Pornstars Hardcore (magazine) models and adult film performers that started their career in 1995 or before. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
April 12th, 2008, 07:49 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 62
Thanks: 100
Thanked 909 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
The Following 32 Users Say Thank You to Wolter20 For This Useful Post: | bkc1man, Bubba E, cirri, davey090762, den77im, eduardol39, Feelvintage, GASMAS, hattyman, herbsmith, hurralada, jomama, jster, LowerCrack, ninjalon, obelix, pocimix, poilutes, racersar, ramolino530, Rubinski, Sixat, slobberboner, snazzz, the pope, Tim72, uni, victor meldrew, WDH, xavier10, zerostress |
April 13th, 2008, 11:01 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Thanks: 42
Thanked 1,803 Times in 61 Posts
|
Ah, the elusive Jane Sikes! Another name it took me a long time to find out.
I guess only with the invention of the www it became possible at all! And, yes, I have to agree, the lady looks sometimes very differently in some aspects, especially regarding the size of her breasts! Could it be that she had implants? Or some very good photographer in some scenes and not so good one in others? Anyway, one sign to identify her is her jewellery! She has a silver ring with a blue and pink/violet stone! Great thread btw! Hugely enjoy the fantastic scans by Rubinski and would LOVE to see some more! Lusty Ladies are my favorite! Regards, Patchy.
__________________
Yo ho porno, a pirate's life for me! |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Patchy The Pirate For This Useful Post: |
April 13th, 2008, 02:38 PM | #13 |
Classic Models Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 58,418
Thanked 133,785 Times in 3,984 Posts
|
Hey Wolter,
Thanks for the input and the picture That is from Golden Girls loop # 8. Any particular reason you think that Miss GG8 is Desiree Vincent? Any credits from a video or ID in a magazine? I think Miss GG41 & Miss GG48 are Desiree Vincent, but Miss GG8 doesn't really look the same to me. Miss GG8's breasts don't droop as much as Miss GG41/48, and I also think Miss GG8 has a different chin and nose. I think Miss GG8 is actually Val Spencer (AKA arol Ann Jackson) Thanks again |
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post: |
April 13th, 2008, 02:59 PM | #14 | |
Classic Models Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 58,418
Thanked 133,785 Times in 3,984 Posts
|
Quote:
As I said many times on this thread already, I'm thinking that Janes Sikes is the dirty blonde in LL349-350, Cram Party, which you posted. That is the girl that is actually ID'd as Jane Sikes. Looks like her again, in LL362, which you also posted. In your posting, you introduced that dirty blonde as Valerie, but Val Spencer is actually in the Body Work loop LL#346 (and I think that's also her in GG#8). That's where the best proof I've seen is pointing right now. Check out this box (Thanks to goldfinger) The girl they credit as Val Spencer is in the top picture (a shot from the Body Work loop LL#346 which I have), and the credit on the box also says Val is in LL#346. Jane Sikes is not pictured, but is credited there twice as being in the Cram Party loops, LL349 & LL350. Seems to be the reverse of what you posted. Where did you get those names? Did you find the answer on the www? Online credits are often incorrect, but I'd like to see them. What have you got? I'm pretty sure all the scans I've put forward as being Laurie Noel have been the same girl, and when Laurie's breasts have been visable, they have looked the same to me. Laurie's breasts are one of the ways I can tell her apart. Her breasts are usually one reason I don't think she looks like these other girls that were being disucssed as possibly being Jane Sikes (and others). Most of these other girls have smaller breasts than Laurie does, and less droop. Again, not all the girls posted on this thread are the same girl. Might not be apparent if you didn't read the text. Does this explain your differing breasts size claims? If not, I'm afraid you'll need to provide more details in order to figure out who or what you are talking about. |
|
The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post: |
April 13th, 2008, 09:25 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 178
Thanks: 90
Thanked 10,505 Times in 161 Posts
|
This is Jane Sikes, from the photoset from "Cram Party"
She was also in one of the Swedish Erotica compilation tapes. She's not the same model as Laurie Noel aka Terry Toledo. She's taller and her breasts and nipples are smaller. The photo on IAFD for "Jane Sikes" is not this model either, but the model referred to as "Val Spencer" in postings above. Last edited by anscoscope; April 13th, 2008 at 10:12 PM.. |
The Following 30 Users Say Thank You to anscoscope For This Useful Post: |
April 13th, 2008, 10:08 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 178
Thanks: 90
Thanked 10,505 Times in 161 Posts
|
Laurie Noel and Craig Roberts from a magazine series where she's credited as "Terry Toledo". Some of these were posted previously - a few are still missing according to the numeration.
I'm not sure where these came from but I found these and a few more sets last year. All were credited as "Jane Sikes" and the filenames begin "js". I don't know a published citation for this model as Jane Sikes but that's how I always knew her and only learned the "Laurie Noel" name recently. It may well be that Laurie Noel and Jane Sikes are one and the same model, and the confusion came from the Lusty Ladies company mistakenly calling the blonde in "Cram Party" by the "Jane Sikes" name. As far as I know that actress only appeared in "Cram Party" and one Swedish Erotica loop. Last edited by Rubinski; October 22nd, 2008 at 12:58 AM.. |
April 13th, 2008, 10:30 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 178
Thanks: 90
Thanked 10,505 Times in 161 Posts
|
Another Laurie Noel/Jane Sikes series. Some posted previously in this thread but this is complete. I have a video from this shoot as well and will post it in the future.
Last edited by Rubinski; October 22nd, 2008 at 01:02 AM.. |
April 14th, 2008, 08:47 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 64
Thanks: 42
Thanked 1,803 Times in 61 Posts
|
Quote:
Patchy.
__________________
Yo ho porno, a pirate's life for me! |
The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to Patchy The Pirate For This Useful Post: |
April 14th, 2008, 01:15 PM | #19 |
Classic Models Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 58,418
Thanked 133,785 Times in 3,984 Posts
|
Quote:
Sounds like your identifications of Jane and Val match the ones from the LL#2 box cover. Are you going by that box cover? Or are these identifications from another source? Independant identifications would help confirm the LL#2 Box Cover credits. Thanks again, Rubinski |
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post: |
April 14th, 2008, 02:05 PM | #20 | ||
Classic Models Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 58,418
Thanked 133,785 Times in 3,984 Posts
|
Quote:
Do you have a scan of that cover? Sounds like this magazine might have an actual credit, which we'd like to see. Everything else I've heard and seen are all hearsay IDs for Jane Sikes. goldfinger showed up with a video credit, and a magazine, both crediting her as Laurie Noel So I had to salute. That's a pretty solid identification. That's when we started trying to figure out how Jane Sikes fits in. Is she a credible AKA, or a different girl? If you would, please post that cover you mentioned. It might help us figure out this puzzle. I'm hoping it will be clear about who they are linking the names too. Would be nice to see the Valerie credits you mentioned too. Please post them here, or give us a post number or a link to the thread to point the way. I don't have time to review all your posts. BTW - I have looked through many of your posts, but I haven't found any Jane Sikes ID Quote:
Or maybe they saw it, but just didn't feel like taking on the task of challenging a popular AKA. We are trying to straighten this out now. It's been a lot of work, but the pay is lousy. We are still looking for help. Thanks |
||
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|