July 8th, 2015, 06:55 PM | #71 |
paludicolous paravant
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 26,735
Thanks: 75,660
Thanked 745,336 Times in 26,855 Posts
|
|
July 9th, 2015, 12:05 AM | #72 | ||
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 7,852
Thanks: 163,934
Thanked 119,241 Times in 7,641 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
July 13th, 2015, 03:46 AM | #73 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,131
Thanks: 226,708
Thanked 356,702 Times in 21,626 Posts
|
I think the thread this links to has perhaps now been deleted? if so then maybe delete that sticky too? /shrug/ Unless it's to return in a revised form.
I was just about to post how it was the "collective" solves, esp. of box entries/difficult ones, that kinda tickled me the most. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: |
July 13th, 2015, 04:30 AM | #74 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 7,852
Thanks: 163,934
Thanked 119,241 Times in 7,641 Posts
|
Hmmm... The thread has been removed. Perhaps it immediately became too much of a model id thread; I'll check with the section Mods there.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post: |
July 13th, 2015, 11:36 AM | #75 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,131
Thanks: 226,708
Thanked 356,702 Times in 21,626 Posts
|
A question for mods: this thread, where I thought I'd seen her before in MIR, I now find I have separately stored the post id of p=2805682 & request title of "MILF", but that post seems now to have been deleted? Was it solved or was there some other reason for its deletion? If it was a solve then that can presumably now be applied to the newer thread?
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: |
July 14th, 2015, 05:20 AM | #76 |
paludicolous paravant
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 26,735
Thanks: 75,660
Thanked 745,336 Times in 26,855 Posts
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to beutelwolf For This Useful Post: |
July 15th, 2015, 01:16 AM | #77 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 7,852
Thanks: 163,934
Thanked 119,241 Times in 7,641 Posts
|
Quote:
Looks like a possibility but I'd like to hear other opinions before they're merged. |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post: |
July 15th, 2015, 05:00 AM | #78 |
Maestro
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 4,505
Thanks: 26,111
Thanked 83,654 Times in 4,342 Posts
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Immy For This Useful Post: |
July 25th, 2015, 01:17 AM | #79 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 30,266
Thanked 12,726 Times in 1,017 Posts
|
Is this really considered "solved"?
[solved] unknown female 319275 @ iafd- unknown #2 All that discussion about what should be considered an appropriate solve... I'm a bit baffled. Cheers. |
July 25th, 2015, 02:23 AM | #80 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 7,852
Thanks: 163,934
Thanked 119,241 Times in 7,641 Posts
|
Any sort of listing in a major database is good, I think. A name is just a means of collecting her work in one place and even a listing for "unknown female xyz" accomplishes this. beutelwolf's eloquence echoes my sentiment. Please post further discussion on this topic here: What is a Suitable Model ID?
Quote:
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|