Prolapses

[mes1127]

I agree. It's hard to imagine anyone would want to intentionally prolapse. After a while I would think that these women have hemorrhoid problems

[flexy32]

It's dehumanising perverted and sick. And for those that condone it, you really should get help. There’s seriously something wrong with you.

[cannon]

thanks to mes1127 for this thread. perhaps some of you have seen it (or for anyone interested), there is additional commentary at the post below. pro and con.

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t51...t-fisting.html

[CallawayGolfer]

Originally Posted by Rob427

One reason why I love the vintage erotica is that women seemed to be treated with more respect in those days. Modern porn seems to be getting more mysoginistic as time goes by and I really don't like it!

Could'nt have said it better myself - Vintage erotica, to me, is something completely different from contemporary pornography - even it is only for the fact that it is a genre focusing on natural beauty, apart from the notion that it is far less misogynistic and even racist than the contemporary trash with its shaven women and their prolapsing anuses, gagging and gulping down liters of sperm.

[filbert]

I agree. The modern stuff is too violent and too much into male superiority. Good sex is when both the man and the woman are having fun. It's a lot more than mutual masturbation. I enjoy seeing the woman having a genuine good time, not the strained, phony 'smile' of a woman who is obviously not enjoying the anal screwing she's getting.

F

[Toxic Dog]

Originally Posted by filbert

I agree. The modern stuff is too violent and too much into male superiority. Good sex is when both the man and the woman are having fun. It's a lot more than mutual masturbation. I enjoy seeing the woman having a genuine good time, not the strained, phony 'smile' of a woman who is obviously not enjoying the anal screwing she's getting.

F

I agree also.

With a vintage porn, you feel more like a fly-on-the-wall watching naturally sexy women (i.e. not collagenated / botoxed / silicone-enhanced / bleached-blonde women) fucking ordinary-looking blokes in ordinary surroundings (like normal suburban bedrooms) - and enjoying it.

One reason I love the old CCC and Swedish Erotica stuff (apart from the fact that the female performers more often than not wore stockings and suspenders) is that a lot of the women in them look just like the sexy woman from down the street - real, ordinary women that the average porn consumer can actually relate to.

That's in stark contract to much of the modern stuff, which seems to be dominated by muscle-bound rednecks on Viagra, indulging in increasingly bizarre and extreme "circus acts" with all-of-a-muchness, concrete-titted Eastern European Barbie Dolls wearing just a piercing in their navel and those ludicrous 'stripper heels'.

- TD

[cabclive]

anal is wrong, to much hurt for the girls

[buuren11]

Originally Posted by cabclive

anal is wrong, to much hurt for the girls

Rubish mate. I had a chick that preferred it over vaginal.

[Hugh Jampton]

Originally Posted by cabclive

anal is wrong, to much hurt for the girls

Then, seriously, you're doing it wrong...

[chinook]

This is an interesting topic.

I have never been remotely interested in blatantly violent material like some of Max Hardcore's stuff, or even that late 1990's Anabolic Khan Tusion crap.

Having said that, I guess I am guilty of getting off on some girl's having anal discomfort with Rocco / Lex Steele in their ass, that gets me off, but it is difficult to admit in light of the fact that I draw the line at outright violence. My statement seems somewhat contradictory, but in the end a good bit of 'athletic' anal (without any torn anuses) is good.