Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Classic Celebs, Beauty & Elegance > Classic Celebrities > Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 3rd, 2023, 06:21 PM   #1
cylnz
Vintage Member
 
cylnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,134
Thanks: 26,049
Thanked 39,632 Times in 3,116 Posts
cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+
Default The Great Big "Is it, or isnt it" Investigation Thread

Hi all, We dont seem to have a goto Fake/Edit/Wrong woman Celebrity Thread, so, since I've been happily looking into those things the last 30 years or so, I thought this would be a good place.

I invite everyone who has a suspect image to post it here with whatever evidence either way you can drum up to prove/disprove the pic/s.

Please dont waste our time with obvious fakes or just plain stupid shit.


IMO, real soon now, AI will start being used to great effect to edit old photos in a realistic way (instead of the cartoon stupid we have now). That's going to present amazing possibilities/problems in the near future.

Imagine the potential to "uncensor" old film clips like Teri Hatcher in Heaven's Prisoners, or to reverse the blue filter on the Salma Hayek Ask the Dust ocean scene.

Anyway, welcome, and have a good argument over whether it's real or not, in female celebland
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience"
cylnz is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cylnz For This Useful Post:


Old May 3rd, 2023, 06:24 PM   #2
cylnz
Vintage Member
 
cylnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,134
Thanks: 26,049
Thanked 39,632 Times in 3,116 Posts
cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+
Default

no 1. Saved as Kim Basinger from a usenet post, mid '90s, supposedly from 1990-92 Germany.
Base Pic:


pic rotated to what seems normal:


evidence of non-editing:
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience"
cylnz is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cylnz For This Useful Post:
Old May 3rd, 2023, 06:33 PM   #3
cylnz
Vintage Member
 
cylnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,134
Thanks: 26,049
Thanked 39,632 Times in 3,116 Posts
cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+
Default

From looking at the pic from various modes/layers/zooms it all looks like it's not been mucked about. Even at 2000% zoom the pixels all grade the same, no smudge tool, no cut-ins, no resolution variations.

I dont see any reason to think it's not a single image.

Now, the question is, is it Kim?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience"
cylnz is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to cylnz For This Useful Post:
Old October 1st, 2023, 11:07 PM   #4
cylnz
Vintage Member
 
cylnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,134
Thanks: 26,049
Thanked 39,632 Times in 3,116 Posts
cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+cylnz 175000+
Default Weird Bellucci

Here's a very common, but technically weird as hell Monica Bellucci pic.
original as downloaded:

and this is 1 operation "equalize":

what the fuck is that?

here is the equalized layer + original layer on vivid light:



other modes and layer extractions:


Looking at it, and considering, I dont think the water reflection ever really existed. I think Monica was just standing there fully nude and the photographer cropped her at hip level and used photo manipulation to knock out the entire background set, (including some sort of mirror or framework) and digitally added in a water reflection, after "improving" her body shape.

If anyone has a better idea, share it, because that's the only series of edits I can get to make sense.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience"
cylnz is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to cylnz For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.