Why do you like vintage? - Page 7

naydah · August 11th, 2008, 11:20 AM

women were women - not a plastic surgery products. Hairy pussies, big natural tits without thinking - are they real or not ?

**Pinkpapercut** · August 17th, 2008, 04:48 PM

I'm saying more or less what everyone else is saying here: in the vintage years the women look like normal women - except perhaps better looking than most - not plasticised whores.

The same was true with HC mags like vintage Private and CeeCee. In the 70s and 80s the girls looked normal, they weren't "porned up" like they are now. I particularly liked the way these mags used sometimes to have their models fully dressed in normal clothes while they were being shagged, something one rarely sees anywhere now.

By the time I stopped buying printed porn about 4 years back, I was buying mags like Tight and 18Eighteen, not because the models looked like late teens, but because compared to most mags they looked normal.

**27cows** · August 17th, 2008, 05:46 PM

Vintage smut reminds me of my misspent youth. There was something a bit thrilling and naughty about porn back then. Now it's everywhere, is readily available in vast quantities all over the web, and the industry is mostly like a production line just spewing out the same old crap.

I love hunting down stuff I remember from the 70s and 80s

Shawdawg · August 22nd, 2008, 06:21 AM

It seems more natural and down to Earth. And yes, not all the women look like Barbie Dolls. Story is corny in porn (and always will be), but the sex seems real.

Also, my 1st pornos that I saw YEARS ago under my Dad's bed (LOL) would be considered vintage now. Got to see censored versions of Plato's and some other movies, but also got to see the uncensored version of Easy.

Still like some modern porn, but vintage has got it for me.

firebelly75 · August 22nd, 2008, 06:30 AM

I like stories. not just people jumping on each other. i love romantic exotic locations. older movies seem to be closer to romance novels. i like escapism! and the men seem more manly, not just guys standing or lying around looking bored.

djbone · August 22nd, 2008, 09:38 AM

because like firebelly there was real story, so some exciting situation. But women were more natural too...

will944 · August 22nd, 2008, 07:56 PM

The women have real boobs and hairy pussies... which I like because the women of my youth looked like that underneath the tacky fashions of the 70's I suppose. But I think all natural women will be the norm again in a few years.

moonpig · August 22nd, 2008, 08:07 PM

I reckon its because the models had more class and the shoots were more refined back then...

ghmain · August 23rd, 2008, 09:39 AM

personally, there is something appealing about watching porn that was considered "dirty"... today's porn is allmost respectable...

**27cows** · August 23rd, 2008, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghmain

personally, there is something appealing about watching porn that was considered "dirty"... today's porn is allmost respectable...

I think that sums up perfectly the way many people feel. Porn just isn't dirty any more.

August 17th, 2008, 04:48 PM	#62
Pinkpapercut Rust Never Sleeps Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: North of the Channel, west of the hills, south of the mountains Posts: 984 Thanks: 31,846 Thanked 20,519 Times in 986 Posts	I'm saying more or less what everyone else is saying here: in the vintage years the women look like normal women - except perhaps better looking than most - not plasticised whores. The same was true with HC mags like vintage Private and CeeCee. In the 70s and 80s the girls looked normal, they weren't "porned up" like they are now. I particularly liked the way these mags used sometimes to have their models fully dressed in normal clothes while they were being shagged, something one rarely sees anywhere now. By the time I stopped buying printed porn about 4 years back, I was buying mags like Tight and 18Eighteen, not because the models looked like late teens, but because compared to most mags they looked normal. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. That's To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 's bottom and I'd love it for a pillow

August 17th, 2008, 05:46 PM	#63
27cows Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 368 Thanks: 9,524 Thanked 5,514 Times in 363 Posts	Vintage smut reminds me of my misspent youth. There was something a bit thrilling and naughty about porn back then. Now it's everywhere, is readily available in vast quantities all over the web, and the industry is mostly like a production line just spewing out the same old crap. I love hunting down stuff I remember from the 70s and 80s Last edited by 27cows; August 22nd, 2008 at 06:45 AM..

August 22nd, 2008, 07:56 PM	#67
will944 Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 2 Thanks: 774 Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post	simple The women have real boobs and hairy pussies... which I like because the women of my youth looked like that underneath the tacky fashions of the 70's I suppose. But I think all natural women will be the norm again in a few years.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

August 11th, 2008, 11:20 AM	#61
naydah Member Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 41 Thanks: 1,806 Thanked 955 Times in 49 Posts	women were women - not a plastic surgery products. Hairy pussies, big natural tits without thinking - are they real or not ?

August 22nd, 2008, 06:21 AM	#64
Shawdawg Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 10 Thanks: 14 Thanked 36 Times in 5 Posts	It seems more natural and down to Earth. And yes, not all the women look like Barbie Dolls. Story is corny in porn (and always will be), but the sex seems real. Also, my 1st pornos that I saw YEARS ago under my Dad's bed (LOL) would be considered vintage now. Got to see censored versions of Plato's and some other movies, but also got to see the uncensored version of Easy. Still like some modern porn, but vintage has got it for me.

August 22nd, 2008, 06:30 AM	#65
firebelly75 Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: arizona Posts: 30 Thanks: 170 Thanked 289 Times in 28 Posts	I like stories. not just people jumping on each other. i love romantic exotic locations. older movies seem to be closer to romance novels. i like escapism! and the men seem more manly, not just guys standing or lying around looking bored.

August 22nd, 2008, 09:38 AM	#66
djbone Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 41 Thanks: 5 Thanked 630 Times in 25 Posts	because like firebelly there was real story, so some exciting situation. But women were more natural too...

August 22nd, 2008, 08:07 PM	#68
moonpig Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 Thanks: 61 Thanked 72 Times in 14 Posts	I reckon its because the models had more class and the shoots were more refined back then...

August 23rd, 2008, 09:39 AM	#69
ghmain Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3 Thanks: 0 Thanked 19 Times in 3 Posts	personally, there is something appealing about watching porn that was considered "dirty"... today's porn is allmost respectable...