Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Classic Celebs, Beauty & Elegance > Classic Celebrities > Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 18th, 2011, 12:13 AM   #1
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+
Arrow A call to the 'snappers' amongst us..!

hi guys.
dont know if this idea for a thread has legs, but im prepared to put the question out there, and we'll see how it goes........

it occured to me, that although a lot of celebs and models wont do full frontal, or often in the celebs case, even topless shots; there must be photographers out there who have done these fhm or zoo style shoots, or been there in some capacity, heard from another guy that had, etc; and know things we mere mortals would love to know too.....?

im talking inside gossip or revealations, not of the godly kind, where you have seen a well known celebrity boob or pussy, while getting changed or being posed for the shoots where the camera then only catches the 'clean' side of the shots..? or all these new glamour girls who dont show their pussy, but again, in between shots, they must show it as they are posed or walk on or off set. i know some 'modesty' is often shown, robes and the sort, but they cant hide every little slip of flesh on a set... can they..??

for an example, ill refer to one story i heard many years back, before a certain miss amanda holden resorted to plastic surgery to keep her looks..... a guy who was on set, 'assisting' during her lads mag shoot, i forget which one (but i will add an image from said shoot underneath), said that she was quite blazon in her approach to the shoot, not bothering to cover up as much as most celebs would, and that during the set up for the below pose, she had her legs apart, clearly showing the had only the merest strip of pubes on her pussy........!! i always thought that was a great 'insight', and would love to hear more similar ones......! if they exist..??

Regards PhEg.


__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:


Old January 19th, 2011, 01:50 PM   #2
angler12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 177
Thanks: 45
Thanked 2,169 Times in 167 Posts
angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+
Default

I know what you mean. I don't know of any specific situation myself, but it occurs to me, for example, that people like Felicity Kendall, in the photo of her behind the blue pillar, must have been more exposed and I expect there would have been more than one photo taken. Again, I recall seeing at least two pictures of a topless (back to camera) Bonnie Langford in an Evening Standard "Friday" supplement many years ago. There are loads of pictures out there of celebs that are clearly naked or topless, but showing nothing
angler12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to angler12 For This Useful Post:
Old January 19th, 2011, 03:37 PM   #3
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+
Default

that is a good example of what im talking about angler.

though the thing im after is the details that we couldnt actually see in the published shots...!!??

i really would like to hear some stories of such shoots, and with the amount of snappers here, im surprised nothing has emerged yet..?? not sure if its some kind of 'code' between snappers and their subjects, or just there is nothing to add to this thread as yet..??

i know the stories are out there, its just a case of being patient, and hoping this thread survives the usual fall down the charts before someone recalls a shoot worth mentioning..??!!
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old January 20th, 2011, 08:12 AM   #4
angler12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 177
Thanks: 45
Thanked 2,169 Times in 167 Posts
angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+angler12 10000+
Default

Of course, there would be a contractual arrangement between model and photographer, model release and suchlike. I would also suggest that the model would have the ultimate embargo on publication or release of images. However, I think what you have in mind is someone on the sidelines getting a sneaky picture. Am I right?
angler12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to angler12 For This Useful Post:
Old January 20th, 2011, 03:01 PM   #5
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+
Default

not even getting the pictures, but just with the knowledge, and memory recall to be able to let us in on the details that we missed. as u suggested, felicity kendall... was stood there naked..... does she trim down there? how big are her nipples..?? etc..... all told from the view of someone who was on set the day these shots were taken...... im pretty sure that coming from the mouth of some studio assistant, and not in picture form, this would break no legal model release contract ever written...??!!
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old March 14th, 2011, 01:41 PM   #6
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+
Default

well that's a good start... to be honest, i was beginning to give up hope that this thread would ever come back to life. so thanks for the insight...... now if we can only get a little more from the other distinguished members here...?? lol
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old March 14th, 2011, 02:46 PM   #7
billybunter
R.I.P.
 
billybunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Gone But Not Forgotten
Posts: 14,404
Thanks: 51,687
Thanked 252,372 Times in 14,171 Posts
billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+billybunter 1000000+
Default

Michelle Marsh springs to mind. There has to be pussy shots somewhere!
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
billybunter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to billybunter For This Useful Post:
Old March 14th, 2011, 05:26 PM   #8
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+
Default

there are some obscured ones in her thread, but ur right, none fully leg open... miss pinder must have been caught by at least one snapper too i suppose..??
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old March 14th, 2011, 05:33 PM   #9
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+
Default

did some in soft focus for her own 'sex' book too... they're in her thread. shame not more graphic... but then why would she.....



again, though all these latest posts interesting and happy to read them... partic the grace kelly info... still looking for behind the scenes stuff... i know the 'tell and be sacked' rule apiles.. but not if person no longer in business and dont have that worry now..??

im maybe also thinking of the sort of stuff you used to get when FHM first started doing their yearly 'girls of' editions..... quite often the really revealing images were saved for then.... i cant recall any right now.. but ill have a think for next time i reply to a post. we also see the occasional posts here, and in other celeb sites, of supposed 'unused or unpublished' shots of top modelling shoots, also that often show just that litle bit more than the shoot first issued....

PhEg.
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

Last edited by pharoahegypt; March 14th, 2011 at 05:36 PM.. Reason: spelling and additional thoughts.
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old March 14th, 2011, 05:49 PM   #10
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+pharoahegypt 175000+
Default

that's not the idea of the thread at all orrible... maybe reread my original post if that's the impression ive given u in latter posts..?? the thread is to reveal shots, or stories of shots, that maybe never made it of glamour girls, celebs, or other persons who posed one way, but they showed more, either to the backroom staff, or snappers, or even that exist but weren't published for obvious reasons...?? is that clearer....?? (as mud he replies..lol)

im a firm believer that there are also celebs, or less revealing glamour girls out there; that will either have asked a favour of a snapper; or even paid; to have fully nude or pornographic shots taken of themselves; either for boyfriends/husbands eyes only; or even just so they can look back when older and smile at how good they looked back when they were in their prime. of course; said snapper would be sworn to secrecy, and told never to publish these images. i have read stories of several models and actress's that have expressed this view, and hoped to hear more here too.....
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

Last edited by pharoahegypt; March 14th, 2011 at 05:54 PM..
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.