Why can erotic producers not see that their material is mostly NON-EROTIC ?

[BeerBelly]

So what is the most uninteresting and irritating form of erotic photography then ?

I can suggest a porn production company called freaks of cock where guys are wielding 15 inch prosthetic willies that project about 2 litres of white sticky gunk onto a girls face ....................DO YOU THINK THAT IS EROTIC !!

What about other productions which photograph the "ultra realistic everyday scenario" where guy walking down street says hello to ultra attractive and perfectly made up girl who weighs about 8 stones and is of supermodel proportions and bone structure. Photos portray the story that 30 secs later the guy has a 10.5 inch tool down the back of that girls throat. DO YOU THINK THAT IS EROTIC !!

Ill tell you my opinion on erotic products of this nature.......100% BULLSHIT

Erotic photography as all about capturing the essence of feminity that captures a guy`s attention in the first place. Good erotic pictures dont need to show bored looking obvious models using dildos on themselves......is there anything more tedious !! The last thing I want to see is some blokes hairy arse and ball sack and I seriously dont need to see Ron Jeremy`s sweaty face and hairy back...................keep guys the feck away.

So Im prettty much derailling what most erotic producers deem to be erotic.

So what exactly is erotic photography in its simplest terms. I make no apologies in admitting that I am a breast man, always have been and always will be. Ive been in tescos and ive spotted girls who were obviously full chested and visually pretty to me. Those girls hadnt been to the salon to have their hair styled, hadnt been to a make up artist to have warpaint applied, hadnt been in trimming their bikini area prior to me seeing them , hadnt hand picked designer fitted underwear , arent sitting under studio lighting to disguise and skin flaws............but are real living women warts`n`all and if some body stopped them to photograph them then the results would have been eroticism in its simplest and most potent form.

An example of just that kind of girl for me would have been Roberta Pedon , did you ever see a more naturally sexy woman !! She ticks all my boxes and if she had been that tescos woman ............well, well, well

Thanks for reading my ramblings, I just find it so strange that producers of erotic photography continually put out exactly the material that I find distinctly non-erotic.

[howerd]

Hi Beer Belly. I largely agree with what you've said however you can't tell other people what they find erotic is or isn't erotic. - if you find it erotic it is to you & if it isn't it isn't. Personally I find anything that denigrates women non-erotic but if someone does it is -rightly OR wrongly (wrongly morally I know) but a stiff willy is a stiff willy for whatever reason. I don't 'get' gay sex but lesbian sex is often sexier than hetero sex because the chicks are usually more into it than some guy who's probably paying the chick for her services. -But that's MY opinion.

If two gay guys find it hot to play hide the sausage in the brown pipe that's their prerogative. I don't get it, you don't get it but if it floats the boat of someone somewhere then to them it IS erotic and you can't say it isn't. It just isn't for you. Having said all that I do agree that most of the time it's ONE guy exercising is sexual ego in front of a camera lens - based on what he's seen of loads of other guys doing exactly the same thing therefore they tend to look very much alike.