Porn production "pet hates" - Page 4

isambard1803 · January 16th, 2008, 10:53 AM

Anything where a performer indicates sexual ecstasy by gaping with his/her gob open. makes them look like the village idiot!

scholes · January 22nd, 2008, 04:54 PM

Stupid American directors that churn out mindless porn for the sake of a dollar.
About as erotic as my Garnny's false teeth!!

**hayt2009** · May 28th, 2008, 04:12 AM

1. Lack of pubic hair (Do guys always want to imagine that the girl is pre-puberty, I don't think so)

2. Lack of romance. There is never (or rarely) any romantic nature or seduction to scenes in films. AND this is often the case in "Golden Age" productions as well.

3. Poor lighting (we would like to see what is going on)

4. Robotic males

5. No smiling or humor is ever present.

ymcba321 · May 29th, 2008, 10:47 PM

I think for me the list is:

1) Agression - there's no way this should have a place in porn, but films and photosets seem to be getting more agressive.

2) The (over)young look - much more than just the bizarre trend for shaved pussies - it's the whole "make them look like a schoolgirl" thing that seems so popular in today's porn. What's wrong with women who look like women!

3) Spitting - am I alone in thinking that this looks repellent

4) Gaping - see above...

5) General lack of pubic hair - even on the guys. Bring back the bush!

6) It's always a facial - is it against the law to cum on a girls belly, bottom, boobs or bush these days? Seemingly so, as no matter what the guy and girl have been getting up to, it always ends with him letting go in her face.

I could go on, but this'll probably do.

**hayt2009** · May 29th, 2008, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonny99

,any dude in any scene that has to masturbate furiously to achieve orgasm with a woman who is obviously way too hot for his sorry ass!

You are so right on that one. How many times in modern scenes now do we have to put up with this. Fuck the beautiful girl for 20 minutes then have to jerk off over her for 5 minutes because she clearly did not turn you on enough to give you an orgasm. Its so fake. Back in the "Golden age" and even well into the 90's you would see the guy fuck the girl, pull out and then cum on her. Some guys like Don Fernando did not even need to be jerked off to cum. (Check out his scene with Fifi Bardot in Pretty Peaches 3, one of the best cumshots in porn ever.)

I will admit that I did see recently a scene featuring alexis silver being done in the arse by a black guy and he did clearly start to cum while he was inside her before he pulled out and shot her face. Need to see more of this.

Monkey Man · May 30th, 2008, 12:07 AM

As an aficianado of lesbian porn I get a little restless during any hetero scene. That's just my tastes.

But does anyone - ANYONE? - really enjoy the sight of a woman sucking a dildo or strap-on? It's just so boring. Fast-forward! In fact abandon any dildo scene in favour of fingers and tongues!

Desiree Cousteau · May 30th, 2008, 02:12 AM

Lots of great responses! In addition to many that have been mentioned that I agree with...

An editing pet peeve on mine is when they re-use the same part of a scene over and over. I assume this was done to lengthen the scene but it's annoying to no end. Some creative work that uses repetition during the finish is sometimes alright but don't make us sit and watch each position twice before we get there.

Men that are arrogant, like they're doing the girl a favor. It only works for me in reverse. The guy needs to be in disbelief of what's happening to him.

The obligatory orgie scene at the end. This was really popular in the late 70s and early 80s. Not the best way to end a film.

Spanking. Sorry but bright red asses do nothing for me.

At the other end of the spectrum..."love making". I have no interest in watching a husband and wife make love with the frustrating internal cum-shot. I already know how to fuck. I'm not watching these for instruction. I want to see some fuckin'!

Anything with that Burt Reynolds looking guy.

Lena · May 30th, 2008, 04:52 AM

The same handful of men in video after video after video after video after video after video.

Here's an example of a modern performer (maybe not so modern any longer). Just click the link and scroll down the titles he's been in.

http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfi.../Mark-Wood.htm

If that isn't an "old boys network", I don't know what is. How would you guys like it if it were the same handful of girls in video after video after video after video...

bigerc · August 4th, 2008, 11:49 PM

Either in films or pictures I prefer a wide shot but then I am a leg man. I also hate silicone and I hate girls who take their stockings off before they get fucked.

good thread!!!

**steamjon** · August 5th, 2008, 12:15 AM

1 Cum shots that are missed as we cut to some other angle.

2 Cum shots where he just dribbles a bit in her back or some obscure place. Why not her arse, tits, pussy, face, mouth.

3 Women with too many tattoos who also have too much plastic.

4 Men with too many tattoos. Got them in the slammer?

5 No cum shot at all. What

August 4th, 2008, 11:49 PM	#39
bigerc Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Belfast Posts: 16 Thanks: 544 Thanked 185 Times in 13 Posts	close-ups Either in films or pictures I prefer a wide shot but then I am a leg man. I also hate silicone and I hate girls who take their stockings off before they get fucked. good thread!!!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

January 16th, 2008, 10:53 AM	#31
isambard1803 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 122 Thanks: 2,926 Thanked 826 Times in 106 Posts	Anything where a performer indicates sexual ecstasy by gaping with his/her gob open. makes them look like the village idiot!

January 22nd, 2008, 04:54 PM	#32
scholes Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: UK Posts: 30 Thanks: 98 Thanked 353 Times in 28 Posts	Stupid American directors that churn out mindless porn for the sake of a dollar. About as erotic as my Garnny's false teeth!!

May 28th, 2008, 04:12 AM	#33
hayt2009 Vintage Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Mars needs Guitars Posts: 538 Thanks: 265 Thanked 23,280 Times in 524 Posts	1. Lack of pubic hair (Do guys always want to imagine that the girl is pre-puberty, I don't think so) 2. Lack of romance. There is never (or rarely) any romantic nature or seduction to scenes in films. AND this is often the case in "Golden Age" productions as well. 3. Poor lighting (we would like to see what is going on) 4. Robotic males 5. No smiling or humor is ever present.

May 29th, 2008, 10:47 PM	#34
ymcba321 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 113 Thanks: 210 Thanked 3,855 Times in 131 Posts	I think for me the list is: 1) Agression - there's no way this should have a place in porn, but films and photosets seem to be getting more agressive. 2) The (over)young look - much more than just the bizarre trend for shaved pussies - it's the whole "make them look like a schoolgirl" thing that seems so popular in today's porn. What's wrong with women who look like women! 3) Spitting - am I alone in thinking that this looks repellent 4) Gaping - see above... 5) General lack of pubic hair - even on the guys. Bring back the bush! 6) It's always a facial - is it against the law to cum on a girls belly, bottom, boobs or bush these days? Seemingly so, as no matter what the guy and girl have been getting up to, it always ends with him letting go in her face. I could go on, but this'll probably do.

May 30th, 2008, 12:07 AM	#36
Monkey Man Member Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 19 Thanks: 1,017 Thanked 225 Times in 15 Posts	As an aficianado of lesbian porn I get a little restless during any hetero scene. That's just my tastes. But does anyone - ANYONE? - really enjoy the sight of a woman sucking a dildo or strap-on? It's just so boring. Fast-forward! In fact abandon any dildo scene in favour of fingers and tongues!

May 30th, 2008, 02:12 AM	#37
Desiree Cousteau Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 19 Thanks: 22 Thanked 580 Times in 19 Posts	Lots of great responses! In addition to many that have been mentioned that I agree with... An editing pet peeve on mine is when they re-use the same part of a scene over and over. I assume this was done to lengthen the scene but it's annoying to no end. Some creative work that uses repetition during the finish is sometimes alright but don't make us sit and watch each position twice before we get there. Men that are arrogant, like they're doing the girl a favor. It only works for me in reverse. The guy needs to be in disbelief of what's happening to him. The obligatory orgie scene at the end. This was really popular in the late 70s and early 80s. Not the best way to end a film. Spanking. Sorry but bright red asses do nothing for me. At the other end of the spectrum..."love making". I have no interest in watching a husband and wife make love with the frustrating internal cum-shot. I already know how to fuck. I'm not watching these for instruction. I want to see some fuckin'! Anything with that Burt Reynolds looking guy.

May 30th, 2008, 04:52 AM	#38
Lena Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 299 Thanks: 291 Thanked 8,118 Times in 228 Posts	The same handful of men in video after video after video after video after video after video. Here's an example of a modern performer (maybe not so modern any longer). Just click the link and scroll down the titles he's been in. http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfi.../Mark-Wood.htm If that isn't an "old boys network", I don't know what is. How would you guys like it if it were the same handful of girls in video after video after video after video...

August 5th, 2008, 12:15 AM	#40
steamjon Vintage Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,109 Thanks: 6,188 Thanked 22,391 Times in 1,260 Posts	1 Cum shots that are missed as we cut to some other angle. 2 Cum shots where he just dribbles a bit in her back or some obscure place. Why not her arse, tits, pussy, face, mouth. 3 Women with too many tattoos who also have too much plastic. 4 Men with too many tattoos. Got them in the slammer? 5 No cum shot at all. What