CSV List - The definitive KK Photo Story, Magazine Story & Film Story data

[fannatastic]

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

I don't have time to think about your considerations at the moment. I'll respond later.

Points 1 and 3 are the main ones to think about.

The others are unimportant or I've decided what to do already.

[icu]

Originally Posted by fannatastic

...

Thanks fannatastic, your datas are not destined for me, but I hope it is ok to use them also here.

CSV updated to No. 5.

Current CSV .MT

[Al Gebra]

CC-CD11_2034(ongoing).csv (including the complete 145 series)

.P, 145a, A Burning Desire, 22, EX55.5,
.P, 145b, Fetish Fun, 22, EX60.5,
.P, 145c, Taking A Chance, 22, SG11.5, Taking A Chance On Love
.P, 145d, Breast Lover, 22, RO68.3,
.P, 145e, Two Hot Holes, 22, RO74.5,
.P, 145f, Quick Thrill Lover, 22, TS61.5,
.P, 145g, Postman's Pleasure, 22, BC39.1,
.P, 145h, Wild Wet Dreams, 22, SB53.1,
.P, 145i, Cock Hunter, 22, SG4.4,
.P, 145j, Classroom Passion, 22, LL23.1,
.P, 145k, Perverted Pleasure, 22, AS84.3,
.P, 145x, Spunky Anniversary, 18, CC106.4,

[icu]

Many thanks for the File and the datas Al

New Lines :
145b, 145c, 145d, 145e, 145f, 145g, 145h, 145i, 145j, 145k,
145x, 512j, 512k, 512l, 513a, 513b, 513d, 513e

Thanks to all, CSV updated to No. 98

Current CSV .P

[screwball788]

Hi!
May be some stupid question but nevertheless: in set cc93f which appeared in TS85 in Oktober 1996 at least one model - Nastassija was at this time definitely older than 20. TS is "teenage sex". Most probably the other girl - Raysse was at this point long time no more teenager too.
Did CC lie to readers?
Thanks

[Minimoo]

Originally Posted by screwball788

Hi!
May be some stupid question but nevertheless: in set cc93f which appeared in TS85 in Oktober 1996 at least one model - Nastassija was at this time definitely older than 20. TS is "teenage sex". Most probably the other girl - Raysse was at this point long time no more teenager too.
Did CC lie to readers?
Thanks

Yes, they did lie and no, they did not lie.

Very many of so-called "teenage" models have reached the age of 20 or sometimes even 30 years. When the production companies are confronted with questions about the age of the models, they always quote that the word "teenage" in their publications refers to "fantasy of teenage sex" (ie. pigtails, teenage clothing and makeup of the models), not as a definite reference to the age of the models when filmed.

This goes for the majority of the production companies, CC included.

[Al Gebra]

Originally Posted by fannatastic

.FS, SO122.1, ?, , , ,

.FS, SO122.1, Motorcycle Mamas, CC1252.1, BC3.4, Birds And Bikes,

Source: catalogue pic (no title): "2 girls + 2 men"

Originally Posted by fannatastic

.FS, SO215.1, ?, , , ,
.FS, SO215.2, ?, , , ,
.FS, SO215.3, ?, , , ,
.FS, SO215.4, ?, , , ,

.FS, SO215.?, ?, CC1348.1, TS9.6, Hole New Experience,

Source: catalogue pic (no title, right, Tiny Tove!)

[bergen77]

Hi. I had well over 100 posts in a previous incarnation so please don't tell me off for being a complete leech but does anyone know of where I can get sets 144 & 145 please?

Apart from the obvious place of course

[Rob4]

Originally Posted by fannatastic

1. If a mag contains only one story with no title, is it worth including? (There are hundreds of early mags like this.)

i have no strong feelings about the other questions.

q1 suggestion - simply have a miscellaneous list that gives the mag title (maybe alphabetically). i don't think any other info is required.

however you do say hundreds... apologies if i've misinterpreted the size of the task.

[Al Gebra]

Originally Posted by fannatastic

There are some .MS contributions by Al Gebra, yuryur and icu which I have not forgotten about and I can add the SY mags to the list. However, before I make these changes, there are a few things to discuss:

1. If a mag contains only one story with no title, is it worth including? (There are hundreds of early mags like this.)

I would include the 'regular' series such as AS and SB (not all PPMs)/early mags), not least because of completeness. Plus, some of them were reprinted (for example "Anal Cavalcade"), they have to be referenced then.

Originally Posted by fannatastic

2. A few stories are continuations of stories in earlier mags, with mostly different pics but from the same shoot. We need to distinguish these from straight reprints where nothing is new. (This is mainly a personal reminder in case I forget.)

Let's deal with them as original stories. In case there are different story titles of one and the same shoot we can add a comment like

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

.MS, SB14.1, Piss Party, 3, ,
.MS, SB14.2, Kinky Lesbians, , ,

.MS, SB15.1, Pee Pleasures, 3, , (part 2 of SB14.1)
.MS, SB15.2, Bizarre Birds, , , (part 2 of SB14.2)

or even

.MS, SB14.1, Piss Party, 3, , (part 1 of SB15.1)
.MS, SB14.2, Kinky Lesbians, , , (part 1 of SB15.2)

.MS, SB15.1, Pee Pleasures, 3, , (part 2 of SB14.1)
.MS, SB15.2, Bizarre Birds, , , (part 2 of SB14.2)

or (maybe best)

.MS, SB14.1, Piss Party, 3, ,
.MS, SB14.2, Kinky Lesbians, , ,

.MS, SB15.1, Pee Pleasures, 3, , (continuation of SB14.1)
.MS, SB15.2, Bizarre Birds, , , (continuation of SB14.2)

I know only one story, which is explicitly named "part 2": Hot Arse Games Part Two - AS78. The last text in AS77 reads "The orgy goes on in Anal Sex 78". In this case the story title is self-explanatory.

Originally Posted by fannatastic

3. Some CC mags have monochrome Cavalcade or Album stories in two parts, before and after the colour pages. Uniquely, I think the first mono story should be numbered 0, then the first colour story numbered 1, etc. Some mags were reissued with extra mono pages, but with my proposal the same colour story would have the same number for both the original and reissue. (The mono text stories do not count.)

Would you include the second part of a monochrome (photo) story in 0 or continue counting after the last colour story?

Originally Posted by fannatastic

4. We need a way to identify stories when two or more are shown on the same cover. One way to do this is to add .1, .2, etc., to 1, 2 or 3 in the Cover field for front, back or inside title page, respectively. For example, 2.1 means "first" pic on back cover and 2.2 means "second" pic on back cover. How to define "first" and "second"? I suggest main pic, then top before bottom, then left before right. If there is one large pic and several smaller ones, the large pic should be .1 and the others numbered from top to bottom and left to right as .2, .3, etc. Top and bottom pics are .1 and .2, respectively. Similarly for left and right pics.

Would it be an issue to use letters instead of numbers? For example .l = left, .t = top, etc. It would be easier to imagine where the pics are placed.