July 27th, 2010, 05:29 PM | #71 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Thanks: 18
Thanked 206 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to maluminse For This Useful Post: |
July 28th, 2010, 05:18 AM | #72 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Thanks: 12
Thanked 200 Times in 33 Posts
|
A moles, than looks/is a simple blur, against tons of differences (the shirt, the waist, the thorax, the hands, the breasts, the full body. What are we talking now? The picture is totally different, but you say than is another take of the same woman (Colleen)? Or another woman than is not Lynda?
Thatīs toooooo much!!! |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to serio02 For This Useful Post: |
August 1st, 2010, 11:45 PM | #73 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Thanks: 18
Thanked 206 Times in 27 Posts
|
Its colleen. She has the same mole in the same spot in the same clothes. Picture is very similar as you have already said. Colleen has a mole there and so does the 'lynda' pic. So its not lynda its colleen. The other photo looks real though.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to maluminse For This Useful Post: |
August 2nd, 2010, 07:25 PM | #74 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Thanks: 12
Thanked 200 Times in 33 Posts
|
So, Collen improved her breasts, did smaller her waist, changed her shirt and her jeans, became taller, between other thousand body differences, all that between this two pictures. Also, in pictures of better quality, those supposed "moles" disappear.
Itīs very evident than they are two different persons!!! |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to serio02 For This Useful Post: |
August 5th, 2010, 03:26 AM | #75 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Thanks: 18
Thanked 206 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
The way to test for fake face is to look for immutable characteristics. scars, moles etc. Its how law enforcement does it. The odds that the other lady and lynda carter has a mole in the same place is what? a million to one? |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to maluminse For This Useful Post: |
August 5th, 2010, 06:22 PM | #76 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Thanks: 12
Thanked 200 Times in 33 Posts
|
Quote:
Identical!!???!! The pose is identical!??!! The shirt looks identical??!!! Iīm sorry, but Your view is indefensible. I think is useless to exchange ideas with you, because you donīt see (or canīt or want not see) the enormous differences between this two photos. Last edited by serio02; August 5th, 2010 at 06:28 PM.. |
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to serio02 For This Useful Post: |
August 5th, 2010, 10:03 PM | #77 | |
Classic Models Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 58,418
Thanked 133,783 Times in 3,984 Posts
|
Quote:
Many differences between these photos have been detailed on this thread already. Other than the chair and the set, almost every detail is slightly different. To paste up that many changes in the days before photoshop would have been a lot of work. Why do it? Just paste in Lynda's head, feather the edges, and be done with it. Why put in 10 times more hours making all those difficult, but minor changes? I believe that the Colleen Camp photo was shot to look like the photo of the cast member they were replacing, namely Lynda Carter. That's why the photos are very similar from a distance, but the fine details do not match. We've seen Lynda's breasts in an earlier movie. Why is it such a stretch for some people to accept that Lynda would pose for this shot? It was only intended to be a prop, and would only appear in the movie from a distance. It wasn't intended to be published, and without permission (plus a lot of money), nobody could publish it legally. So, when the magazine got a copy of the photo under the table, I think they invented the cover story about it being faked, so they could publish it without getting sued. I think the photo is all Lynda. |
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post: |
August 6th, 2010, 10:55 PM | #78 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Thanks: 12
Thanked 200 Times in 33 Posts
|
Quote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Lyle-Wagoner-Lyn...efaultDomain_0 You almost can see everything... |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to serio02 For This Useful Post: |
August 7th, 2010, 02:17 AM | #79 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Thanks: 18
Thanked 206 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
I also agree camp and carter did similar shoots. However I believe based on the mole which i circled. Yes you cant see it well but its there that this is a camp photo with lyndas head. I mean identical in clothing etc. Also the camp ring is in the carter photo. Nbd though we can agree to disagree. |
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to maluminse For This Useful Post: |
August 8th, 2010, 06:34 AM | #80 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 46
Thanks: 238
Thanked 466 Times in 35 Posts
|
Where are the originals?
Sorry i haven't read all of the posts, so someone may have already said this.
But. If the LC pic is a fake it must be made up of two pics. Linda, presumably clothed, where the head came from. And someone, maybe Colleen, where the body came from. Find those originals and there can be no argument. As the "faker" must have had found these pics somewhere I'm surprised no one on this board can find them. And if you guys can't find them.... well I don't think they exist. Just my 2 cents. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to clubIman2008 For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|