|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
General Erotica Post here for Erotica that is neither or both Vintage and Modern |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 12th, 2009, 03:25 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 19
Thanks: 4,413
Thanked 55 Times in 10 Posts
|
i agree 100% with you beerbelly...
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to bedjo For This Useful Post: |
October 12th, 2009, 08:06 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 142
Thanks: 6,765
Thanked 1,094 Times in 130 Posts
|
Greenman has basically said what I was going to say, so "me too". So many sets in 80s mags with really beautiful women were ruined for me like that, even M*yf**r (the real one not the modern version) did this occasionally; somebody even wrote a letter to them saying "the female sex organ is a wonderful thing, but it is not photogenic". Agreed!
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to TheDogThatDidntBark For This Useful Post: |
October 13th, 2009, 05:21 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 80
Thanks: 8
Thanked 650 Times in 74 Posts
|
People are entitled to their view , I am as straight as they come, and I dont find yanked open vulvas for all to gawk up particularly appealing from a photogenic point of view, just cheapens and forces a part of the female body way downmarket to be honest.
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to BeerBelly For This Useful Post: |
October 14th, 2009, 12:55 AM | #14 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 348
Thanks: 840
Thanked 14,412 Times in 317 Posts
|
Pink shots are pretty much my porn raison d'être. The way the image explicitly, unequivocally draws attention to the most erogenous of erogenous zones is as thrilling as erotica gets. I'm actually shocked, saddened even, that some consider a beacon of femininity to be 'ugly', 'degrading' or 'cheap'.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Sadielover For This Useful Post: |
October 14th, 2009, 05:30 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Thanks: 139
Thanked 1,099 Times in 35 Posts
|
I've never been into the "gynecological exams" for arousal. Not knockin' it; it's just not my cup of tea. Marilyn Monroe once said "Sex Appeal is 50% what you have and 50% of what people think you have." I think La Monroe nailed it there... uh, so to speak.
That's why my area of interests lie in American magazines before 1975 or so. As the 70's progressed, girlie magazines got raunchier and raunchier. Took all the fun out of it. |
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ericinwisconsin For This Useful Post: |
October 14th, 2009, 06:10 AM | #16 |
Porn Archeologist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 92,252
Thanked 241,326 Times in 12,746 Posts
|
I think its like any other part of the body some are more appealing than others
I personally dont see the point in going any further than speading the legs,subtle placement of the hands as below as demonstrated by claire green but plying it open really adds nothing thats not already being conveyed.I came out of there as a baby so I know how wide it can stretch...lol To me its where erotica ends and porn begins Leave nothing to the imagination and watch and see how many become bored and jaded |
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to buttsie For This Useful Post: |
October 14th, 2009, 08:38 AM | #17 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 348
Thanks: 840
Thanked 14,412 Times in 317 Posts
|
The bottom image isn't terribly hot (although still nice), but the top two pics are spectacular. A pretty face coupled with gynaecological detail is the best of both worlds.
Personally, I think it's a cunnilingus fan's thing. You want to sense and savour as much of her pleasure and sexuality as possible, which is easiest when there's a giant open pussy in your face.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Sadielover For This Useful Post: |
October 14th, 2009, 01:07 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
Thanks: 993
Thanked 190 Times in 20 Posts
|
That's exactly it for me. Especially when her face is just visible between her legs/breasts and she's looking straight down at the viewer as if to say: "now lick it!" I think we need a thread for exactly those type of pics!
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to schermvlieger For This Useful Post: |
October 14th, 2009, 02:53 PM | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Depends.
Most of the time I'm not. It depends on the woman
and what she knows about personal hygiene. Some of these pictures are disgusting. I'd lay odds that they had to air brush out the flies when processing the pictures. |
October 14th, 2009, 04:57 PM | #20 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 348
Thanks: 840
Thanked 14,412 Times in 317 Posts
|
I can assure you that the huge majority of women have impeccable personal hygiene.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sadielover For This Useful Post: |
|
|