|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Model ID Request The place for all model ID requests, classic and modern day. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
July 29th, 2015, 05:32 PM | #31 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,445
Thanks: 18,112
Thanked 17,846 Times in 1,341 Posts
|
Quote:
Back to basis - if one try to find more materials (the main reason in many cases) googling name Lucy will give some results at the end, but XNK123 can give only one - EGAFD profile, site which we can't control (and which can merge profiles, close one of them, change coding or simply stop working as now). Maybe just in cases when we don't have anything except XNK123 should be allowed to open topic titled XNK123 but just in PMT, and without calling ID request closed (if HOF game is problem - give point to poster by some lex specialis, points are far from most important thing here). Actually, I think that purport of Pending Model Threads would be missed if we don't use it for cases like this. Of course, Lucy, XNK123 and EGAFD are just examples, to make story simple. Last edited by ponky; July 29th, 2015 at 05:56 PM.. |
|
July 29th, 2015, 08:21 PM | #32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,039
Thanks: 54,100
Thanked 116,750 Times in 7,057 Posts
|
bit part player
Most modern ids are easily solved if shes beautiful,what I mean is she gets a full photographic solo set credited to her by met-art femjoy etc.For the not so beautiful who have credits in porn as name only e.g. Edina a German pornstar who Im searching at the moment for a solve ,she has a huge back catalogue of porn vids but dosent appear on our approved websites or credited anywhere else it seems. I would love to know who gave her the name ,how she got into it ,and she was producing porn as preganant..dont you wonder about their back- story?
p.s. if this is not a fitting post for this thread delete at will...
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
July 29th, 2015, 09:00 PM | #33 | ||
paludicolous paravant
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 26,698
Thanks: 75,543
Thanked 743,421 Times in 26,818 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
The flipside of this is my issue with these forename@mag ids: if the name was used in multiple pictorials then fair enough, but typically our Lucy@Wankmaster appeared in other pictorials under a different name whilst Wankmaster magazine re-used forename Lucy for further pictorials. So it neither leads to any kind of interesting profile nor is it unique; the XNK numbers, even if the profile is disappointingly trivial (1 entry) will at least be unique. |
||
July 29th, 2015, 10:12 PM | #34 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,445
Thanks: 18,112
Thanked 17,846 Times in 1,341 Posts
|
Probably joke but I'll say that I didn't have intent to underestimate anybody; I appreciate the commitment, dedication.
However, I do not see the reason for closing topic as solved if we don't find "normal" profile on usual databases or other common ways (keep it open - the simplest solution and win-win situation which satisfies both ideas). That is not ban on posts with link at some "XNK", "unknown" or similar profile-pages, they can be very useful... but I would say that for someone mag nickname is useful also. There everybody can pick nickname, name, code... for their folders on HD, depending on the habits, knowledge, etc. In worst case scenario some topic will be open for years, maybe even forever - but we really don't loose anything. In other hand, less experienced topic-starter with "unknown @..." as final answer gets very little, with smaller chance for improving in some time period (let's say next several months or years in Mystery Corner). |
July 29th, 2015, 11:43 PM | #35 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: back in the dirt
Posts: 10,629
Thanks: 29,714
Thanked 89,255 Times in 9,358 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
personally, i do it quite the same as you with my private(!) collection. all models are based on "unique keys", on a numeric ID. but that's not the "name" property. same with egafd and iafd. we all use this unique ID only if the name property is empty (and create something like "unknown [unique ID]"). a model ID request is usually started to fill the name property, not to receive a unique key someone is using instead. is any starter of the thousands of still unsolved requests worried if these few "unknown female 1234 @iafd" / "XNK 4321" fills the amount of unsolved threads or the mystery box? Quote:
nevertheless, if "Lucy @Wankmaster" is such an insufficient ID, then it's rather the question if such a request should better stay unsolved as well, than to do it totally wrong by chosing "Unknown xxx @yyy" as a solved request just because we've saying "Lucy @Wankmaster" is a solve (which, to me, is still more of a solve than "unknown xxx @yyy") Quote:
__________________
You may be the most important brick in the least important wall, but really you're just a bit of something on a bit of something else. Last edited by hos; July 29th, 2015 at 11:58 PM.. |
||||
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to hos For This Useful Post: |
July 30th, 2015, 03:43 AM | #36 |
Classic Models Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,064
Thanks: 58,248
Thanked 133,341 Times in 3,973 Posts
|
I think we should have the EGAFD UNK number searchable on the MIR thread, and link the EGAFD page there too.
That info should be searchable and linked in their Model thread too. I don't care if we use names or numbers. I just need something to call the folder, so I can collect the info and content. Some of my folders have my MIR request thread number in the folder name, but I usually have a time frame, hair color, and first name listed first. As for solving the requests, it depends on the girl, how long we've waited, the IDs we've seen, the content available, and the sources. I wouldn't mind leaving the threads open for better ID, but MIR threads are not as visible as model section threads, and scan section mods will not accept links to model request threads. Bottom line, when the threads resides in MIR, they are less visible, which makes more ID info and content less likely. So, we need to get these girls an actual model thread, to get the extra visibility. Especially the pretty ones with some decent content. The only problem with starting a thread on a poor ID is, model mods usually trash ID info, and/or move threads without redirects. Makes it hard for interested parties to keep up with. Interested parties may still be subscribed, and their subscriptions should move, but if the post with the better ID info was trashed, you wouldn't get any notice. So, there are problems with solving it early, and problems with solving it later. However, I think there are times when we should solve a request with what we have. If Website-AAA has her as UNK 1234 in one movie, that may be the best we ever get. If there are more titles linked at Website-AAA, I think it becomes more justified to use, but I'm not sure what the model section mods would think about a model thread called UNK 1234 @ Website AAA. Does anyone know the rule? I hesitate to ask. If the Model mods won't accept a number as a thread title, I'm not sure we should call it solved with a number. I think some first names are allowed. Hopefully a model with some decent content would at least have one first name ID we could use, and then we could add UNK 1234 @ Website AAA as an AKA.
__________________
Read the VEF rules
Read the section rules before posting that section Do Not post written thanks in content threads Instead, Click To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Check your uploads and reup when needed Dupe uploads (mirrors) in your posts would be great On images, create a gallery A mirror image gallery would also be great Just link your mirror into your post Use different hosts for mirrors If you need help, or know a better way PM me |
November 8th, 2015, 01:32 PM | #37 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,107
Thanks: 226,533
Thanked 355,496 Times in 21,602 Posts
|
Indeed they would say precisely that, if asked. But that's also different from how they behave in practice--I mention this without meaning to imply any criticism by that, just observing, because it seems pertinent. I'm sure you all don't need me to tell you there are lots of existing single-pictorial model threads, and they're by no means all "old" ones, either.
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: |
November 8th, 2015, 02:11 PM | #38 | |
paludicolous paravant
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 26,698
Thanks: 75,543
Thanked 743,421 Times in 26,818 Posts
|
Quote:
When I first started to contribute significantly to the model area I created a thread called "Lesser known Sexy models" (or something similar) that included likely one-off pictorials that appeared in the German mag Sexy. Next thing I noticed was that the thread had gone and a mod had split it into four individual model threads. Subsequently I liberally created fresh model threads, even if only based on a single image. |
|
November 8th, 2015, 07:05 PM | #39 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: back in the dirt
Posts: 10,629
Thanks: 29,714
Thanked 89,255 Times in 9,358 Posts
|
when it comes to model threads (and not fetish themed like "boobs", "matures", "stockings" or publication themed like "men only", "teendreams" etc), it should always be 1 model per thread and there should be no rule at all how much stuff has to be available at start. as if amount of threads would be a problem in a forum.
threads like "lesser known models" are just lazy, and the performance and search-worthyness is pita. it should have never been allowed to start or it should have been splitted early. now it's too late. also, modern section should have a separation of pornstars and softcore models. this would eventually lower the amount of threads slightly . i have no idea why of all things "celebrities" are treated special in classic and in modern - in a forum dedicated to e r o t i c a.
__________________
You may be the most important brick in the least important wall, but really you're just a bit of something on a bit of something else. Last edited by hos; November 8th, 2015 at 07:15 PM.. |
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to hos For This Useful Post: |
November 8th, 2015, 08:02 PM | #40 | ||
paludicolous paravant
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 26,698
Thanks: 75,543
Thanked 743,421 Times in 26,818 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|