Donna Edmondson discussion

[acejet61]

Originally Posted by acejet61

As soon as I figure out my new scanner I will post all the Donna slides right side up ! She is Gorgeous in every position !

[utube]

Right-click on the image in Windows Explorer, then select either Paint or Windows Photo Viewer, and you should see the option to easily rotate then save.

She is the best!

[utube]

Better yet, just snap pics with your smart phone and upload, and we'd all be glad to do the rotations ourselves. Are you going to be uploading individual pics of all the slide pics ujil2 uploaded on p.13 of the primary DE thread? Any zooming of those pics totally messes up the resolution, so nice close-ups with that camera should be magic! Can't wait...

[utube]

Ace, any updates coming on your efforts to post/right-size the Donna slides?

[BUSTYFAN1947]

I noted she was in Playboy and Playmate of the Year but the young lady I knew from Greensboro, supposedly working in real estate business in same city where we met, YEARS AGO, am 70 now, was a far cry from being a "virgin", so guess there must have been two women, doing the same thing, had at least 2 sons, same measurements, could have passed for twins, than the 1 I knew.

[utube]

Any pics or further bio on the twin?

[keats]

Originally Posted by utube

Any pics or further bio on the twin?

This is the best possible reply to the previous post. Thank you.

Originally Posted by BUSTYFAN1947

I noted she was in Playboy and Playmate of the Year but the young lady I knew from Greensboro, supposedly working in real estate business in same city where we met, YEARS AGO, am 70 now, was a far cry from being a "virgin", so guess there must have been two women, doing the same thing, had at least 2 sons, same measurements, could have passed for twins, than the 1 I knew.

I'm not sure I completely understand. Are you saying that you met Donna and when she posed for Playboy she already had two sons? If that's the case, I don't doubt you. So much easier to hide things before social media was a thing.

[keats]

Originally Posted by Goodfella49

I'm not sure I completely understand. Are you saying that you met Donna and when she posed for Playboy she already had two sons? If that's the case, I don't doubt you. So much easier to hide things before social media was a thing.

Stipulating that PB frequently created a fiction for the bios of the PMs there a lot of compelling reasons to reject the suggestion of promiscuity and motherhood above. For one thing, the Donna Edmondson story is remarkably specific compared to most other PM bios. Greensboro plays a prominent part in the pictorial, text, and video. A newspaper search yields a lot of local North Carolina press for the story too; even in the absence of social media, such a sustained fiction seems unlikely. Especially after her well-deserved ascent to PMOY the gossip of a fraud would be too hard to resist. Then there's the consistency of the bio over the years. You can point to so many other classic married and maternal PMs that PB itself outed over the years (Alison Park for one) that it's hard to believe that Donna's bio would be considered to be different. Finally, social media and vindictive gossip have been around for decades now and still this claim has not risen until this moment. I readily grant that the PM image and the girl-next-door image are fictions but they are fictions based on a reality about America in the mid-to-late 20th century, and yes, there were any number of marvelous PMs that certainly lived faster lives than suggested in their bios or the GNS narrative but I sincerely doubt that Donna falls into that category. Finally, I suggest that it is absolutely impossible to prove the claim one way or another, barring a direct statement from the subject herself. Therefore any such claims are merely gossip and unworthy of all the delights this girl has shared with us over the years. We all have our fantasies and fantasy is what PM is all about.

[Lurk_D]

To sum up, anything you say about yourself must be taken as the truth, because who would know best? Anyone that disputes it must provide concrete proof, or they're lying.

Conversely, anything you say about someone else is a bald-faced lie, unless you can provide concrete proof to back up your claim.

If you can't prove it, you're wrong. If you won't prove it, that is proof you're lying.