Problem Reports, Questions & General Announcements - Page 16

**highwayman274** · December 17th, 2015, 11:24 PM

Thanks, beutelwolf!

I have edited the 2013 MB entry; removing the old image links, and substituting the new ones.

**torteusz** · January 24th, 2016, 03:53 PM

This thread is solved, but does not have this information in the title.

**Pepper II** · January 25th, 2016, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by torteusz

This thread is solved, but does not have this information in the title.

Title amended; thanks.

**effCup** · February 7th, 2016, 01:44 AM

Firstly: I think this thread is perhaps getting pretty close to being worth keeping, though I'm not sure whether it's a PMT or not? /shrug/

That raises a more general question: we have some threads that are marked as solved but they probably (I haven't actually asked the relevant section mods, but it seems a fair assumption) don't have a name suitable for use as a new thread title in the relevant models section. Some examples: egafd xnk0000 style "names", or here a single first name & number, this time from bgafd. I agree that these seem unsatisfactory types of names/titles for a model thread, but on the other hand it would also seem unfortunate if, having marked them as solved, we then later decide to delete them. Is there somewhere, or some way, for them to be "kept" in MIR? They're not the same as PMT because they're not in sufficient condition to be moved to a models section, but maybe PMT is still the right sort of area for them? Or else perhaps just keep them in MIR but mark them as both "solved" and "keep thread"? /shrug/

Just chucking out thoughts.

A model thread, including PMT or queries for keeping are (technically) "graphs" or network mappings of associations, i.e. linkages of various instances of model pictures & various metadata (mag. titles, "instances" such as vol. & no., dates, in-mag. "names"/aliases, etc., perhaps photog.). It would seem a shame to "lose" all that through query deletion? Yes, I know, mag. posts of these sets are still present in the mags. sections, etc., but it is the connexions, the linkages, that are of concern/perhaps want to be retained?

**Pepper II** · February 7th, 2016, 02:14 AM

I recently had some correspondence with the Classic Pornstars Mods and they don't want thread titles with the XNK designations. I agree we have threads which should be kept intact but for various reasons must remain in this section such as in this example. The simplest way would be to use the [keep thread] designation so it doesn't inadvertently get trashed. Then when eligible the first post could go into the Mystery Box and the remainder of the thread shunted to the Mystery Corner as a follow-up.

Sally [11] @ BGAFD would make an acceptable thread title, I think. One name magazine names would also be acceptable if the name appears repeatedly. The worst case is when the model appears in various magazines with a different name each time. None of these names would really be suitable as a thread title.

I believe amassing material for a model and preserving it is an important function of this section.

**effCup** · February 11th, 2016, 11:09 AM

Should this become a PMT?

**highwayman274** · February 11th, 2016, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by effCup

Should this become a PMT?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepper II

I would say Denise Oldenburg is her real name.

It looks to me like there is enough material to support the opening of a thread in PMT; and possibly in the Classic Softcore section.

Let's see what Pepper II has to say.

**Pepper II** · February 12th, 2016, 02:47 AM

Thanks for the reminder, effCup. I've moved it over.

**effCup** · February 16th, 2016, 01:10 PM

Somewhere in MIR there's a query for this model. This doesn't really add anything to the query except (I think) this is a better quality scan. Anyway, I'm drawing a blank in trying to re-find the right thread to post/link, so maybe someone here else can help?

A cutout scan kindly posted by Jim.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jism Jim

edit: no, found it & this scan is already posted there, sorry. Please ignore or mods can delete, I've left it up just to notify.

**effCup** · March 4th, 2016, 10:12 AM

I have a reference to a mystery box post that now seems to be deleted?

The name Adele was already associated with that post. I was simply going to add that she was (also?) Adele @KPC.

January 24th, 2016, 03:53 PM	#152
torteusz Vintage Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Earth Posts: 5,703 Thanks: 14,191 Thanked 138,188 Times in 5,570 Posts	This thread is solved, but does not have this information in the title. __________________ My posts: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by torteusz; January 24th, 2016 at 04:45 PM.. Reason: Wrong link

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

December 17th, 2015, 11:24 PM	#151
highwayman274 Former Staff Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: The Great White North Posts: 7,697 Thanks: 245,094 Thanked 130,613 Times in 8,119 Posts	Thanks, beutelwolf! I have edited the 2013 MB entry; removing the old image links, and substituting the new ones.

February 7th, 2016, 01:44 AM	#154
effCup *Vintage Idiot* Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: History Posts: 22,129 Thanks: 226,701 Thanked 356,685 Times in 21,624 Posts	Firstly: I think this thread is perhaps getting pretty close to being worth keeping, though I'm not sure whether it's a PMT or not? /shrug/ That raises a more general question: we have some threads that are marked as solved but they probably (I haven't actually asked the relevant section mods, but it seems a fair assumption) don't have a name suitable for use as a new thread title in the relevant models section. Some examples: egafd xnk0000 style "names", or here a single first name & number, this time from bgafd. I agree that these seem unsatisfactory types of names/titles for a model thread, but on the other hand it would also seem unfortunate if, having marked them as solved, we then later decide to delete them. Is there somewhere, or some way, for them to be "kept" in MIR? They're not the same as PMT because they're not in sufficient condition to be moved to a models section, but maybe PMT is still the right sort of area for them? Or else perhaps just keep them in MIR but mark them as both "solved" and "keep thread"? /shrug/ Just chucking out thoughts. A model thread, including PMT or queries for keeping are (technically) "graphs" or network mappings of associations, i.e. linkages of various instances of model pictures & various metadata (mag. titles, "instances" such as vol. & no., dates, in-mag. "names"/aliases, etc., perhaps photog.). It would seem a shame to "lose" all that through query deletion? Yes, I know, mag. posts of these sets are still present in the mags. sections, etc., but it is the connexions, the linkages, that are of concern/perhaps want to be retained?

February 7th, 2016, 02:14 AM	#155
Pepper II Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sunny South Florida Posts: 7,852 Thanks: 163,911 Thanked 119,238 Times in 7,641 Posts	I recently had some correspondence with the Classic Pornstars Mods and they don't want thread titles with the XNK designations. I agree we have threads which should be kept intact but for various reasons must remain in this section such as in this example. The simplest way would be to use the [keep thread] designation so it doesn't inadvertently get trashed. Then when eligible the first post could go into the Mystery Box and the remainder of the thread shunted to the Mystery Corner as a follow-up. Sally [11] @ BGAFD would make an acceptable thread title, I think. One name magazine names would also be acceptable if the name appears repeatedly. The worst case is when the model appears in various magazines with a different name each time. None of these names would really be suitable as a thread title. I believe amassing material for a model and preserving it is an important function of this section.

February 11th, 2016, 11:09 AM	#156
effCup *Vintage Idiot* Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: History Posts: 22,129 Thanks: 226,701 Thanked 356,685 Times in 21,624 Posts	Should this become a PMT?

February 12th, 2016, 02:47 AM	#158
Pepper II Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sunny South Florida Posts: 7,852 Thanks: 163,911 Thanked 119,238 Times in 7,641 Posts	Thanks for the reminder, effCup. I've moved it over.

March 4th, 2016, 10:12 AM	#160
effCup *Vintage Idiot* Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: History Posts: 22,129 Thanks: 226,701 Thanked 356,685 Times in 21,624 Posts	I have a reference to a mystery box post that now seems to be deleted? The name Adele was already associated with that post. I was simply going to add that she was (also?) Adele @KPC.