|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
General Discussion & News Want to speak your mind about something ... do it here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
March 23rd, 2015, 10:58 PM | #1951 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,212
Thanks: 48,026
Thanked 83,522 Times in 7,206 Posts
|
Quote:
Much of the rest of native Americans seem to have been malnourished, on the edge of starvation-- bones suggest that iron was hard to come by, anemia rampant. But in the Pacific Northwest, between seafood and berries, folks were fat and happy . . . till smallpox came and wiped out much of the population. Quote:
"Bill Gates drinks water distilled from human faeces" http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30709273 But back to Oz: the thing about the Aboriginals that impresses me is that they lived successfully in a climate that's got a million ways to kill you. That's the tragedy: what they were really good at, isn't valued anymore. There were tracks I drove, and thought dangerous, that these folks routinely walked, barefoot. The things the Maori and the native Americans were good at are easier for us to understand-- everyone admires a big warrior, even an Indian fighter like Sherman was named after an Indian warrior. But being able to survive in the Simpson desert? That's just beyond our ken. We couldn't even imagine doing it. Aboriginals routinely made journeys on bare feet that no one would even try. |
||
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to deepsepia For This Useful Post: |
March 24th, 2015, 10:40 PM | #1952 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 4,056
Thanks: 70,881
Thanked 41,071 Times in 4,047 Posts
|
Quote:
More to the point-you cannot make any meaningful comparisons between the (pre-European contact) respective cultures and way of life of each racial group. |
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Dr Pepper For This Useful Post: |
March 25th, 2015, 01:03 AM | #1953 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,212
Thanks: 48,026
Thanked 83,522 Times in 7,206 Posts
|
Quote:
My point was to look at the experience of indigenous peoples in three British offshoot nations-- NZ, Australia, and the U.S. (I didn't mention Canada, though there are some important distinctions between the Canadian experience and the U.S.) I don't think that Australian intentions were any better or worse than those of white folks in NZ or North America, but the outcomes seem quite different. My impression is that the aboriginal Australians fared the worst, and that's what the numbers indicate. The question is why. There are some institutional reasons -- in NZ and the US, indigenous peoples have a constitutional status, in NZ because of Waitangi, in the US because they're recognized as foreign nations in the Constitution. In Australia, by contrast, the country was declared "terra nullius" -- an empty land. It's only in our lifetimes that they've actually become full citizens of Australia, in the 1967 referendum, and only much more recently -- up to the present-- that they've gotten land titles. But I think that the constitutional status was much less important than the political and military status. Aboriginal Australians were never able to put up a signficant fight, in the way that the Maori and the native Americans were. Similarly, no Aboriginal leaders were able to have the political impact of the King Movement in NZ, or Chief Joseph in the US. Again, that's not a slight on the Aboriginals -- they were good at something entirely different, living and surviving on a huge continent, for perhaps 40,000 years or more with no contact with anyone else. They are descended, most likely, from the very first men to push out from Africa and across Asia (they -- I think uniquely among modern men-- have Denisovan DNA) So in my travels I saw aboriginal communities that looked to be doing very badly. By contrast, I thought white Australians paid much more attention to the issue than white Americans do to naive American issues. In an aboriginal community near Broome, I ran into girls from a rather posh Melbourne school who were up there for school holidays working . . . Would be unusual to see something like that in the US. Similarly, Tony Abbott made a point of saying that he wanted to make aboriginal affairs a personal responsibility -- we've never had a US president say anything like that about Native American issues. NZ is obviously quite different because the Maori population is so much larger, proportionately, so they can't be ignored politically. Last edited by deepsepia; March 25th, 2015 at 01:20 AM.. |
|
March 25th, 2015, 07:02 PM | #1954 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 4,056
Thanks: 70,881
Thanked 41,071 Times in 4,047 Posts
|
Is this discussion morphing into a comparison of various natives peoples' experience of western colonisation-in which case I 'd suggest that most examples are uniformly bad-or a discussion on why the state of the Australian native peoples seems-to the outsider so much worse than the other examples? [we haven't even looked at Africa-and that could provide fodder for an entire forum till the end of time.]
I think it is an oversimplification to even make the comparisons-the histories of the various examples are driven by their physical environments and established well before any European contact. In the case of the Australian peoples I would argue that having survived for such an extended period in a physical environment that was largely inimical to humans and did not permit anything other than a nomadic hunter gatherer existence, confined to small extended family groups there was neither the opportunity nor the cultural evolutionary pressure to aggregate in to larger group which in turn permit both cultural expansion-in terms of tribalism-and the competition for resources which drives both warfare and development. If this is the case-and there is little evidence for the counter argument-then you have a society which does not change significantly over millennia-and hence the relative gap between indigenes and colonisers is about as wide a you can get anywhere in human society (with the possible exception of a few relict Amazonian populations) . Can 200 years of western influence-both positive and negative influences-close a 40 millennia gap? |
March 25th, 2015, 08:07 PM | #1955 | ||||
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,212
Thanks: 48,026
Thanked 83,522 Times in 7,206 Posts
|
Quote:
And the general thrust of my observations just reflects my experience of Australia, a place which is very similar in many ways to the US in attitudes and in many aspects of politics. So its interesting to compare. The same thought occurred to Neville Shute a generation ago, see his book Beyond the Black Stump. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
One of the great comparison reads is about events in the NT in the 1920s. There's a fantastic book by a Englishman turned jackaroo, Tom Cole called "Hell West and Crooked". There's another book, by an anthropologist called "Donald Thompson in Arnhem Land", which covers some of the same events, but giving the aboriginal side of the story (Thomson was a great linguist, and spoke several Aboriginal languages). The events were famous at the time, involving rape of aboriginal women by pearl fisherman, revenge killings, and then a subsequent police mission. For my money, reading these two books together was a great education on "what happens on a frontier" between indigenes and colonialists, and I can think of many similar episodes in the history of US- native American encounters. |
||||
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to deepsepia For This Useful Post: |
March 25th, 2015, 09:59 PM | #1956 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 546
Thanked 1,538 Times in 104 Posts
|
The ONLY way to fix this world is to OUTLAW (ban) ALL political parties!
ONLY truely independent politicians to be alowed to sit in parliament or be allowed to run for public office. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Krackerjackdk For This Useful Post: |
March 25th, 2015, 10:02 PM | #1957 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 546
Thanked 1,538 Times in 104 Posts
|
"Political Parties are the cancer at the heart of our democracy" - DIRECT QUOTE from recently retired US Republican Congressman Michael 'Mickey' Edwards
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Krackerjackdk For This Useful Post: |
March 25th, 2015, 10:31 PM | #1958 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 546
Thanked 1,538 Times in 104 Posts
|
Further, NO MORE 'Professional Career Politicians' allowed!!
Outlaw the ridiculous practice, whereby politically active schoolies, 'VIRTUALLY ALWAYS' from families strongly connected to some political party, leave school to attend university SOLELY to become involved in student politics and then leave uni to offer their services as staffers to MP's of their favorite political party in the hope that they will receive pre-selection for a future safe seat in parliament so that they can bludge off the public purse for the rest of their miserable parasitic lives!!! Make it 'LAW' that All politicians MUST have held a normal regular job for a minimum of 15 years before being allowed to run for parliament in order to have experienced life outside of politics and acquired normal life skills like the general population have to!!! This is the ONLY way to rid the democratic system of crooked career party affiliated politicians who are so easily corrupted by rich media moguls and other high wealth individuals and return ownership of the democratic process back to the people. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Krackerjackdk For This Useful Post: |
March 26th, 2015, 07:54 AM | #1959 | ||||
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,406
Thanks: 55,003
Thanked 60,212 Times in 4,401 Posts
|
Quote:
"There were many violent acts of resistance, replicated the country over, as Aboriginal people took a stand against the occupation of their land and the destruction of their social, religious, legal and communal systems. Some Aboriginal people soon become afraid of entering Sydney Town because of the threat of gunshot wounds and death. There had been many wounded and killed and other encounters known of in the bush because Aboriginal people were present wherever farmers went and they always resisted the taking over of their land." http://www.sydneybarani.com.au/sites/first-contact/ Quote:
There was a kind of pre-election pledge to spend time in Aboriginal communities on an annual basis. Around 18 months later he showed up for a photo opportunity. Quote:
Quote:
Compared with Abbott's Australia Day faux par of 26th Jan 2014 ” stating that Australia was “nothing but bush” before British invasion and called pre-colonisation civilisation “extraordinarily basic and raw”. https://newmatilda.com/2014/11/14/to...ite-settlement $534 million cut to Indigenous programs. Hardly befitting of a 'self appointed' “Prime Minister for Aboriginal Affairs”/"Minister for Womens Affairs"/"The infrastructure PM/One Man band." |
||||
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to blondifan For This Useful Post: |
March 26th, 2015, 08:53 AM | #1960 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,406
Thanks: 55,003
Thanked 60,212 Times in 4,401 Posts
|
Fair Dinkum Aussie Blues
Words (& Music) by Matt Taylor.
1st chorus and latter part of second chorus. It seems topical and has been playing in my head for days. "I got the fair dinkum fair dinkum Aussie Blues Sometimes I get the feeling this poor boy has been abused Weaned on Mickey Mouse the t.v. big cars and processed food Where the dollar is religion, this sure aint doing me no good. ... the black man and his dreamtime seem to be far more real than the party pies and beer that make the iron man big deal" Lyrics do not exist online for this radio single from 1974, nor does audio streaming (Youtube or otherwise) for the song. Cultural cringe? |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to blondifan For This Useful Post: |
|
|