[Mystery Followup- Re-opened] - Girl from Model Directory Magazine

[Rubinski]

Followup thread for 2009 MB girl here


[7]

http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...&postcount=110

Here's the scans breslaubob requested.


Pauline Archibald

http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...d.php?t=198396

These scans are not in her thread, but it looks like her after she went with the porno cut.

Update - Looks like I was wrong. Not Paula

[effCup]

Sorry, I'm currently not convinced.

Above model seems to have had a boob job, but I don't see any sign of that in Pauline's thread?--different shape & position/lay to breasts, different nipples/areolae.

Quite a facial resemblance to PA, but... could be just styling (make-up, photog. approach), but above model looks younger, less "weathered"/experienced in face than PA?--i.e. "flawless" skin compared to some slight lines/imperfections/character on PA's face?

The following is quite tangential/impressionistic, so could be wrong:

I can't be sure without seeing a photog. credit, but would otherwise say the above model was a Hank Londoner/Jim Paris model (setting & style), i.e. predominantly US-based? Archibald was photog. by (among others) Michel Moreau, so perhaps Europe-based? Yes, I know, models & photogs. frequently board aeroplanes, but...

[BudMan4ever]

I can see why you were thinking Londoner as the photog, I was actually thinking maybe Hicks or a Hustler photog from the 80's & 90's whose name is escaping me right now and really pissing me off. I've sometimes wished they'd credit their airbrush artist, and imho this guy should've been banned for turning these photographs into paintings.
As for where they were shot I'd have to say in the United States just by looking at the books. FDR's New Deal, and an Introduction to Law among them were typical college books 25 years ago (probably a much longer timeframe, 25 years ago is what I know personally), and most of them look like props that were bought used from the shelves at some random college bookstore.
I do agree that the MG looks much younger than Pauline as well. The other part that bugs me is if this is simply a younger version of Pauline most models do not start out with a sparse bush and grow it out to a full carpet as they get older, it usually goes the other way around. And yes, by saying usually I am conceding not always.

[Greenman]

I am with effcup on this one. I have checked all my 44 pics of Paula that I have and I am convinced it isn't her. The pics of her I have she has a very dark, erm well pussy and this girl's is light. Secondly the lighting suggests that it is an American model and my suspicions were aroused when I saw the series of books next to her-in the first one you can clearly see a book on Frankland D Roosevelt-I doubt a British shoot would have used US book titles. So IMHO don't think it is her and as such still not solved-I could be wrong but I'd need more proof.

Here are two shots of Paula to compare with above. Check the face and the other thing I mentioned

[common]

I am with effCup & Greenman on this; I don't think it is her.

Here is the simple reason why. The labia's do not match. They are distinctly different.

mystery vs Pauline Archibald


/

Originals

vs

[Rubinski]

Originally Posted by common

I am with effCup & Greenman on this; I don't think it is her.

Originals

I was just comparing that scan, with this one


Looks like it probably is a different vagina.
Tending to agree that it isn't her now.

Since my last post, I also decided the MG probably has thinner arms and legs.
She also looks less muscular in the shoulders and hips.
Face is very similar, but the body just has too many little differences.

Actually kind of glad it isn't her.
Glad I PM'd Greenman for his opinion, which got the ball rolling again.

Okay, so who is she?
She was in Model Directory in 1992.
If she was a working model, there should have been more layouts from this session, and probably a few more sessions.
I have looked through a lot of mags in that time frame, and haven't seen anything.
Seems like someone else would have seen this girl somewhere.
1991 - 1994 should be pretty well represented here.

[effCup]

Originally Posted by Rubinski

She was in Model Directory in 1992.

Oh? I thought she was "model 10" from MD 08-03, 1990-09? See here, & later here.

[Rubinski]

Originally Posted by effCup

Oh? It thought she was "model 10" from MD 08-03, 1990-09? See here, & later here.

Right you are. Thanks!
If it's from mid 1990, that's one more reason it probably isn't Paula. The were a lot of layouts of her in 1990-91, and she had a full bush until the last session I know of. Hard to have a furry bush, and a shaved bush at the same time.
Don't know where I got 1992, but that had me thinking this session was at the end of her career. Sorry for the error.
My penance is - TBD
In the meantime, I should check some earlier mags for this girl.

[dbailey]

Another MB-entry included now in this thread.

Thanks to billy707 in the Gallery thread

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=815



I feel certain that she appeared in a Paul Raymond publication in white lingerie and stockings at the same time under a different name. The set was on a tiled floor. May have been Club Int or Mens World

[Dick Needle]

Here's the original set that appeared in Club Intl (UK) 18-09 (1989) photog. Hank Londoner as Harry Linden. They are calling her Yolanda Summers but I haven't been able to find any further info on that name.