|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads Post here for all Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
March 17th, 2018, 09:38 AM | #671 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mice Planet
Posts: 3,882
Thanks: 15,974
Thanked 29,726 Times in 3,826 Posts
|
Quote:
Feel free to read this post and ask Chinese children working in smartphones enterprises and African children working in coltan mines, if watching from their perspective, Capitalism is that fun ? Capitalism is like a Gorgon. |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roubignol For This Useful Post: |
March 17th, 2018, 10:40 AM | #672 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oakland, California, United States. I have a beautful view of the BART tracks and I-980
Posts: 8,955
Thanks: 103,061
Thanked 151,470 Times in 8,946 Posts
|
I am reading Ancient Society by Lewis Henry Morgan. Morgan inspired Marx and Engels. The latter followed up by writing The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. I am going to read Engels' book next and check Marx's writings. (It is my plan to read both Wealth of Nations and Das Kapital so I actually know what these guys said, but I am not sure how much 18th and 19th century prose I can take. I have previously relied on excerpts and synopses.)
Marx and Engels had long been communist revolutionaries before Morgan published in 1877. The Communist Manifesto was published in 1848. My preliminary surmise is that Marx and Engels realized in reading Morgan's work that communism would mark a return to the ancient clan and tribal based systems that had served human beings for millennia before the agricultural revolution brought in slavery,, private property, and the state. Many peasant villages still ran on the tribe/clan communal property and democratic systems even into the 20th century. It may well be naive to think that humanity can return to a more natural set of social relations. Tribes can only grow so large and the geographical areas they control are necessarily limited. On the one hand, we are witnessing all over the world strong desires of human beings to live in smaller groups more responsive to distinct customs and local control. We also know that historically these smaller groups were militarily at the mercy of the larger and more organized nation states. One thing becomes crystal clear, however, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc. severely misunderstood or perverted the vision of Marx and Engels. |
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Arturo2nd For This Useful Post: |
March 17th, 2018, 10:44 AM | #673 |
Former Staff
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 113,754
Thanks: 259,856
Thanked 1,139,095 Times in 113,871 Posts
|
No honestly, it is not mythological it exists
Do you mean you can only look at it using a mirror or if you cut its head off a winged horse will appear
__________________
RIP Doctor Who
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 23 November 1963 to 25 December 2017, sacrificed on the altar of identity politics. The show is dead to me, but my DVD's live on If you can re-up dead links please consider adding this to your signature. It helps when looking at reports of dead posts. Please PM me re any dead images although it is likely if it is outside Celebs I may no longer have the content |
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Wendigo For This Useful Post: |
March 17th, 2018, 06:06 PM | #674 |
Lost luggages?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: France
Posts: 7,268
Thanks: 92,097
Thanked 86,759 Times in 7,170 Posts
|
Staline is good.
Lenine is good. One day a man came and says: I know he truth brother. Years past, millions people dead. The man who came died. Then another one. And another one etc.. I love human being... Zappa said : movement sucks. Yes it is. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to footstep For This Useful Post: |
March 17th, 2018, 09:27 PM | #675 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,205
Thanks: 47,953
Thanked 83,436 Times in 7,199 Posts
|
Quote:
Like other enlightenment intellectuals, they saw modernity as sweeping away the horror of ignorance; they were not remotely romantic about what they saw as the illiterate superstitions of the past. Quote:
Its precisely that arrangement that produces the totalitarianism of Communism in practice. Marx & Engels' "vision" doesn't include this, because they never had the real world problem of "OK, we've decided to ban private property-- so how to we get farmers to grow and sell food". |
||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to deepsepia For This Useful Post: |
March 17th, 2018, 11:01 PM | #676 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oakland, California, United States. I have a beautful view of the BART tracks and I-980
Posts: 8,955
Thanks: 103,061
Thanked 151,470 Times in 8,946 Posts
|
Quote:
But you are right that Marx started out as an arrogant, but brilliant young man without any practical experience. Pragmatic people like myself would have counted on the peasant farmers to organize agriculture in cooperation with researchers, secure in the knowledge that they would be happier and more productive without the nobility taxing them to death. My ancestors were pioneer subsistence farmers in the United States. What we think of as independent family farms were, in the North and Midwest, communities of family farmers that worked together on the labor intensive tasks of plowing, harvesting, barn raising, etc. My paternal great grandfathers were a carpenter and stone mason who built houses, chimneys, barns, churches and schools while their brothers, in-laws, and hired hands did most of the farm work. I am not clear if you have actually read Marx and Engels works or are simply reiterating the assertions of other authors. As mentioned I have relied on excerpt and synopses other than having read The Communist Manifesto in its entirety several times for various classes. It is quite obvious to me that as "the state withered away," they envisioned decisions being made cooperatively in democratic processes. This was what the workers soviets were supposed to do in Russia, but that pretty much went out the window in the Civil War and subsequent suppression of dissent. Stalin then extended the program into a cult of personality to cement his own dominance. Lenin saw it coming and tried to derail it, but he never recovered from the assassination attempt and Stalin was able to isolate him. In theory, while only one political party has power in communist countries, the party governs itself democratically. (Which mostly hasn't happened.) In China, eight other parties act in "advisory capacities" to the CPC. Mao followed Stalin's example. The Party tried to change the direction after the failure of "The Great Leap Forward," but Mao rode the "Cultural Revolution" to implement his insane schemes and China spun its wheels for more than a generation. Now you have Xi reverting to dictatorial methods. China was already running out of steam and Xi's program will probably revert to terror and stagnation. Mao, Ho Chi Minh, and Castro all naively hoped to work with the United States to bring their countries forward with education and technology, but the embedded capitalist interests preferred policies of enmity, isolation, sabotage and warfare. Please also remember that the United States participated in the invasions of Russia the Western powers mounted trying to reverse the revolution. Diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union were not in place until 1933. It was really quite natural and wise for Stalin to be wary of Churchill and the United States. It really is impossible to sort out how much the problems we associate with Communism are traceable to the fact that the criminal regimes took root in countries with long histories of despotic rule that were lacking in democratic institutions and traditions. Even so, it is a mistake to assume that the citizenry quietly fell into line with Party dictates. The politics were impossible, but in a world not held captive to capitalist greed and need for dominance it would have been theoretically possible to seek forms of government and social organization that provided more widespread benefits for humanity in general and a whole lot less bloodshed. But, as I have said many times before, we appear to need a better grade of human beings than we currently have to make these idealistic schemes work. But who knows? Most advanced industrialized nations are able to provide education, healthcare, family leave and vacations, and old age pensions for their people despite the constant propaganda and sabotage by capitalists interests. Chances are that we will soon be one more biological dead end and new species will get their opportunities. But if we can avoid the planet's defense mechanisms against a species run amok, we just might be able to figure something out. Last edited by Arturo2nd; March 17th, 2018 at 11:39 PM.. Reason: Fix mistakes |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Arturo2nd For This Useful Post: |
March 17th, 2018, 11:53 PM | #677 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,205
Thanks: 47,953
Thanked 83,436 Times in 7,199 Posts
|
Quote:
If you read his essay "On the Jewish Question", you'll find that he's extremely hostile to Judaism as a tradition and he's hostile to religion in general. Nothing ambiguous about it. Quote:
My observations are not based on "reiterating the assertions of other authors" but rather the observation that a) Marx and Engels have only the vaguest ideas of how their desired Communist Revolution would actually work, and never have even the remotest practical experience with running anything (Engels father owned a textile factory where he works briefly in his youth, and then again when he's older, the closest association either of them have to the industry they're theorizing about) b) but they do explicitly require that this State and Party assume all kinds of power and c) when people put these ideas into practice, its totalitarianism. Take one simple point: the State monopoly on capital and investment. Marx & Engels are clear enough on this-- while there might be some very small private property left, job #1 is to seize all banks and investment properties. From the Revolution forward, the only entity you can rent from, borrow from or get an investment from-- is the State. And if the State doesn't want you to . . . its not going to happen. Period. Control of your economic life is necessarily totalitarian-- under the total control of the State and Party. Marx never had to wrestle with just what that means in practice-- its means "The State makes every consequential decision in the economy. It decides what gets broadcast and by whom, what gets built and by whom, what gets sold at what price to whom". Armchair Marxists always slide by just how necessarily totalitarian such a system is. But Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot --- they get it just fine. They see crushing small landowners, shopkeepers and pretty much any economy activity not controlled by the State and Party as essential. On the evidence, they're reading Marx more carefully than you have. See Stalin's "History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union [short course]" for a deep look into how Stalin understood Marx. Like Mao and Pol Pot, he spent a long time reading and thinking about Marx. "The Short Course" is essential reading, if you want to understand how Communists in power understood what it meant to take Marx from paper and ideas and make it real. Last edited by deepsepia; March 18th, 2018 at 12:28 AM.. |
||
March 18th, 2018, 09:17 AM | #678 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mice Planet
Posts: 3,882
Thanks: 15,974
Thanked 29,726 Times in 3,826 Posts
|
Quote:
Here is a small analysis (google translate) written by the Professor of History : "Lionel Richard" Quote:
So what is the alternative? Last edited by Roubignol; March 18th, 2018 at 09:28 AM.. |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to Roubignol For This Useful Post: |
March 18th, 2018, 09:24 AM | #679 | |
Former Staff
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 113,754
Thanks: 259,856
Thanked 1,139,095 Times in 113,871 Posts
|
I refer the honourable member to the answer he gave some moments ago Quote:
Pay attention at the back of the class please and stop picking your nose
__________________
RIP Doctor Who
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 23 November 1963 to 25 December 2017, sacrificed on the altar of identity politics. The show is dead to me, but my DVD's live on If you can re-up dead links please consider adding this to your signature. It helps when looking at reports of dead posts. Please PM me re any dead images although it is likely if it is outside Celebs I may no longer have the content |
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Wendigo For This Useful Post: |
March 18th, 2018, 09:49 AM | #680 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mice Planet
Posts: 3,882
Thanks: 15,974
Thanked 29,726 Times in 3,826 Posts
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Roubignol For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|