|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes. |
View Poll Results: The nude pictures | |||
They are of Lorraine | 545 | 75.80% | |
They are of a lookalike | 112 | 15.58% | |
They are fakes | 62 | 8.62% | |
Voters: 719. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
July 20th, 2011, 09:38 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 275
Thanks: 838
Thanked 3,934 Times in 280 Posts
|
Quote:
I found this version of one of the original pics that seems to have more damage than the version shown earlier in this thread - maybe someone had tried to fix the damage for publication - but this version seems to show the mole on the right breast (as seen in the "glasses and leaning-forward pic in post #10). It's faint but it's there - you can see it best by making the pic slightly, but not much, bigger. Proof that it's her? I'm going for yes. Any thoughts? |
|
December 23rd, 2011, 12:55 AM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 74
Thanks: 90
Thanked 2,238 Times in 69 Posts
|
Lorraine Kelly nude cleaned up
I've done some work in GIMP to clean up one of the two nude Lorraine photos. It's always been my opinion that they are both photos of her, and it was slightly disappointing how much dust and scratches were on the photos. I think the cleaned up version is a vast improvement so I'll give the second one a go when I get chance.
Last edited by caballero; December 23rd, 2011 at 01:16 AM.. Reason: updated link |
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to caballero For This Useful Post: |
December 23rd, 2011, 01:03 AM | #33 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9
Thanks: 26
Thanked 75 Times in 8 Posts
|
I'm affraid this LK thing is wishful thinking.
yep she would have the same moles if the head was pasted on. Look at the picture, the head is too big for the body, there is a necklace that is perfect for hiding photoshop joins. The pic looks aged artificially. She doesnt look young enough. Look at the younger lorraine in the earler posts. It just isnt worth the tissues. sorry guys Last edited by major blisters; December 23rd, 2011 at 01:04 AM.. Reason: added |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to major blisters For This Useful Post: |
December 23rd, 2011, 01:10 AM | #34 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 74
Thanks: 90
Thanked 2,238 Times in 69 Posts
|
Quote:
I've also uploaded a larger version than the one previously posted in this thread. |
|
The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to caballero For This Useful Post: |
July 15th, 2012, 03:37 PM | #35 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Underground in the Mountains of Madness
Posts: 2,790
Thanks: 1,012
Thanked 96,980 Times in 2,804 Posts
|
Totally Cleaned Versions
OK Lads, here she is as god and Kodak intended ....
I am not entering the debate as to whether its Ms Kelly, and so you pays your money and makes your choice (but I did spend a lot of time sympathetically cleaning these properly ... ), however I will simply say this. As a regular repairer of old photos for this site, the scuff marks, scratches and general dirt are totally consistent with a self developing Polaroid shot of the period. There was no evidence of faking, and I have not spotted enhancements on any part of the pictures (and as I know how to do this, I can see if its poorly done ... colour or clone blur when super enhanced for example). That's not to say they are not faked ... I could do it myself. But what I am saying is that they are not obviously fakes, and considering the low fame of the subject, it would be a lot of effort for little reward. So in my mind the question is simply one of identification .... anyway enjoy Last edited by VintageKell; July 15th, 2012 at 09:52 PM.. Reason: Typo |
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to VintageKell For This Useful Post: |
November 30th, 2012, 04:48 PM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 19
Thanks: 22
Thanked 715 Times in 15 Posts
|
So I think we can now agree it is the lovely Lorraine.
The question remains: why did she do it? |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nollag For This Useful Post: |
March 15th, 2015, 10:09 AM | #37 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Underground in the Mountains of Madness
Posts: 2,790
Thanks: 1,012
Thanked 96,980 Times in 2,804 Posts
|
Lorraine Kelly fake or not???
I posted these specially cleaned (all whitespots, scratches and stains removed), pictures back in 2012, and re-upped on the post in 2014, but I guess the links must have died and the post was eventually removed ... I probably didn't notice when we lost a lot of posts a year or so ago. I was only reminded because she's on a lot of TV at the moment, so here they are again (extra tweak) along with the tell tale mouth and gum line evidence that its her. Credit to op's of the original pictures in earlier posts.
|
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to VintageKell For This Useful Post: |
March 15th, 2015, 10:51 AM | #38 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
Quote:
In the first pic you can see the lighter coloured hair of the original Reader's Wife behind the dubbed on head. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Poncey For This Useful Post: |
March 15th, 2015, 12:33 PM | #39 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Underground in the Mountains of Madness
Posts: 2,790
Thanks: 1,012
Thanked 96,980 Times in 2,804 Posts
|
'Well known fake' .... you mean her denials? I guess its up to mods .... there are other posts of these pictures on the thread. Personally I am not as convinced as the poster who claims 'fake'.
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to VintageKell For This Useful Post: |
March 15th, 2015, 10:14 PM | #40 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,659
Thanks: 10,164
Thanked 87,379 Times in 5,774 Posts
|
I'm convinced though that posts 41 & 42 are identical and one 'should' be deleted!!!
Then a junior member comes along and posts it AGAIN!!! Someone has also thanked it 'both' times And it's time that the continual posting of the two pictures over and over again in this post should cease!! But I know 'for sure' that it's 'MY' post that will be deleted |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mitchspur For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|