Topless photos of Kate Middleton - Page 5

Norks · September 20th, 2012, 09:53 PM

Ah, that old adage...

If you don't want topless pictures of yourself appearing in the tabloids, don't sunbathe topless.

They really have been idiotic.

nevada1 · September 23rd, 2012, 05:42 AM

I'm not English. But I do respect the royals and someones privacy. The photos were wrong! That lowlife paperatzzi (or however you spell it) should have been shot out of that tree by the SAS security. I'm sure that his dead body would have a gun by the time the french police arrived. (And the camera missing).
When I copy photos from the internet or mags they are of ladies that pose of their own accord and for pay.
The lady Kate had an expectation of privacy. We honor that here in the U.S.
They are a young newlywed couple in the south of France. Give me a break and show some respect for them and the CROWN!
This will go away, however, i'm surprised that this fine forum lowered it'self and published the photos at all.

**Sir Honkers** · September 23rd, 2012, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billybunter

Her tits are ugly anyway.

the photo is so bad, how can you tell...anyway I'd still fill in for Will why he was off serving grand-mama and country.

**MrInBetween** · September 26th, 2012, 08:36 AM

It's interesting how many responses to this are to blame her for letting it happen. She wasn't getting them out on Brighton beach, you know. I can't remember where I first heard the following idea, but I can remember the force with which it struck me: that the reason we so often blame victims is because if they weren't at fault, what's to stop it happening to us too? People who buy houses on the flight path of an airport should have known there'd be intolerable noise levels; benefit claimants can't be victims of circumstance but only of their own shiftlessness; women who are raped should know better than to dress in that way. Now I'm not suggesting that many members of this board are worried about being snapped with their tops off specifically, but we'd all hate to end up in a situation where what we'd like to keep most private was exposed to the public gaze (enter your personal example here). And maybe our reaction that she shouldn't have let it happen is our way of reassuring ourselves that there's no way it could happen to us.

**pharoahegypt** · September 26th, 2012, 08:47 AM

I must admit, I'd also hate to be snapped while eating out that fat bird from the next street....!!! But then that's why I make sure we keep the curtains closed, and don't do it in her back garden..!!!

leviathan0999 · September 26th, 2012, 12:10 PM

There's a great line from Aaron Sorkin in his oscar-winning script for "The Social Network." He writes Mark Zuckerburg telling the Winklevoss twins' lawyer, "If your clients had invented Facebook, they'd have invented Facebook."

You know how you can tell someone's invaded your privacy? They've invaded your privacy. They've breached your walls, picked your lock, been inside your compound. If you can plainly see what's outside of your private territory, what's outside your private territory can plainly see you. That is not an expectation of privacy.

**troglodyte** · September 26th, 2012, 05:29 PM

Kate topless

trog

PS
The "Se & Hör" pics are here:

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...51#post2218351

Jackieby · September 29th, 2012, 11:38 AM

Perhaps the other female members of the Royal Family could show solidarity with Kate & get topless too?

**kayfabe** · February 25th, 2013, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrInBetween

...Ruth Jeffery seems to have managed to get all the films of her removed from porn-sharing sites.

Not quite + the programme aires again tonight...her nightmare continues. Probably a good reason to keep it shut, instead of sharing with the world.

herby · April 18th, 2013, 01:46 PM

The rules are simple to any royal, celebrity, sports star or anyone in the public eye, if you take your bra off someone will photograph you, if the picture is taken from a public place like a road you have little chance in the courts. Kate may have thought she was safe but with modern lenses no chance however as we all know the quality was so poor she was barely recognisable. in future she'll probably leave her top on if she's got any sence if not i hope the quality is better.

September 23rd, 2012, 05:42 AM	#42
nevada1 Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 63 Thanks: 1,325 Thanked 534 Times in 58 Posts	My 2 cents I'm not English. But I do respect the royals and someones privacy. The photos were wrong! That lowlife paperatzzi (or however you spell it) should have been shot out of that tree by the SAS security. I'm sure that his dead body would have a gun by the time the french police arrived. (And the camera missing). When I copy photos from the internet or mags they are of ladies that pose of their own accord and for pay. The lady Kate had an expectation of privacy. We honor that here in the U.S. They are a young newlywed couple in the south of France. Give me a break and show some respect for them and the CROWN! This will go away, however, i'm surprised that this fine forum lowered it'self and published the photos at all.

September 26th, 2012, 08:36 AM	#44
MrInBetween R.I.P. Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Gone But Not Forgotten Posts: 3,934 Thanks: 51,364 Thanked 48,453 Times in 3,898 Posts	It's interesting how many responses to this are to blame her for letting it happen. She wasn't getting them out on Brighton beach, you know. I can't remember where I first heard the following idea, but I can remember the force with which it struck me: that the reason we so often blame victims is because if they weren't at fault, what's to stop it happening to us too? People who buy houses on the flight path of an airport should have known there'd be intolerable noise levels; benefit claimants can't be victims of circumstance but only of their own shiftlessness; women who are raped should know better than to dress in that way. Now I'm not suggesting that many members of this board are worried about being snapped with their tops off specifically, but we'd all hate to end up in a situation where what we'd like to keep most private was exposed to the public gaze (enter your personal example here). And maybe our reaction that she shouldn't have let it happen is our way of reassuring ourselves that there's no way it could happen to us. __________________ I'm sorry Gentlemen, that's all the lipstick around the nipple we have time for To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

September 26th, 2012, 08:47 AM	#45
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 4,491 Thanks: 10,176 Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts	I must admit, I'd also hate to be snapped while eating out that fat bird from the next street....!!! But then that's why I make sure we keep the curtains closed, and don't do it in her back garden..!!! __________________ Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

September 26th, 2012, 12:10 PM	#46
leviathan0999 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 152 Thanks: 1,601 Thanked 1,560 Times in 140 Posts	There's a great line from Aaron Sorkin in his oscar-winning script for "The Social Network." He writes Mark Zuckerburg telling the Winklevoss twins' lawyer, "If your clients had invented Facebook, they'd have invented Facebook." You know how you can tell someone's invaded your privacy? They've invaded your privacy. They've breached your walls, picked your lock, been inside your compound. If you can plainly see what's outside of your private territory, what's outside your private territory can plainly see you. That is not an expectation of privacy. Last edited by leviathan0999; February 27th, 2013 at 07:37 PM.. Reason: Fixed a typo

September 26th, 2012, 05:29 PM	#47
troglodyte Vintage Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Elsinore, DK Posts: 643 Thanks: 7,866 Thanked 17,431 Times in 658 Posts	From an Irish site Kate topless trog PS The "Se & Hör" pics are here: http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...51#post2218351

September 20th, 2012, 09:53 PM	#41
Norks Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 35 Thanks: 1,008 Thanked 689 Times in 32 Posts	Ah, that old adage... If you don't want topless pictures of yourself appearing in the tabloids, don't sunbathe topless. They really have been idiotic.

September 29th, 2012, 11:38 AM	#48
Jackieby Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 69 Thanks: 91 Thanked 562 Times in 58 Posts	Perhaps the other female members of the Royal Family could show solidarity with Kate & get topless too?

April 18th, 2013, 01:46 PM	#50
herby Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 16 Thanks: 23 Thanked 130 Times in 14 Posts	The rules are simple to any royal, celebrity, sports star or anyone in the public eye, if you take your bra off someone will photograph you, if the picture is taken from a public place like a road you have little chance in the courts. Kate may have thought she was safe but with modern lenses no chance however as we all know the quality was so poor she was barely recognisable. in future she'll probably leave her top on if she's got any sence if not i hope the quality is better.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode