|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
January 24th, 2018, 12:10 PM | #1 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,135
Thanks: 226,717
Thanked 356,748 Times in 21,630 Posts
|
Scandi Delights - discussion
This thread is for discussion of matters relating to the Scandi Delights id project thread. Please post any discussion/comments/etc. here and not there, thanks.
|
|
January 27th, 2018, 06:36 AM | #2 |
paludicolous paravant
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 26,735
Thanks: 75,664
Thanked 745,388 Times in 26,855 Posts
|
|
January 27th, 2018, 09:31 AM | #3 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,135
Thanks: 226,717
Thanked 356,748 Times in 21,630 Posts
|
Firstly: I recommend downloading the text file(s) linked in the thread & import them into a spreadsheet app (e.g. MS Excel, OfficeLibre Calc, google docs, etc.). A great many models are already named. That will help save some of the eyestrain.
2528 is Maria Berggren (aka Amy Bishop). That's what the doc. says but also I recognised her, i.e. a known set of hers--see some pics. from Model Directory in her thread. I haven't got round to checking it yet but 2530 is listed as Claire Margarson and I don't doubt you. Secondly: don't rely upon the model ids given in the text docs. A great many are probably correct but I've already been burnt by a couple that were not/I wasn't sufficiently careful about. So: eyestrain not entirely dispensed. I don't envisage needing to spend too much time id'ing many of the models as a consequence. Maybe we'd be better to devote more of our attention to: a) those that are incorrectly id'd b) those for whom an id is not already known/we don't recognise? /shrug/ Just a suggestion. Not all sets numbered/listed are present. There are gaps. |
January 27th, 2018, 11:45 AM | #4 | ||
paludicolous paravant
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 26,735
Thanks: 75,664
Thanked 745,388 Times in 26,855 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
I was referring to the one on the left, not the right. Even in the text file there is a reference to Margarson as 2528: 922 2528 CLAIRE MARGARSON 91 "beach and rocks, red bikini, eating fruit. British dark blonde" It's very frustrating about the original source that leading 0s make a difference. |
||
January 27th, 2018, 11:56 AM | #5 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,135
Thanks: 226,717
Thanked 356,748 Times in 21,630 Posts
|
Quote:
|
January 27th, 2018, 12:16 PM | #6 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Offshore
Posts: 2,937
Thanks: 18,453
Thanked 35,174 Times in 2,849 Posts
|
Quote:
If that doesn't work, try editing one of the number fields adding ' at the front and see if it displays the leading zeros. Regards 40+
__________________
Touchy, feely.............with Cherry Healey (once she's got rid of that god-awful nose ring). |
|
January 27th, 2018, 12:27 PM | #7 | |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,135
Thanks: 226,717
Thanked 356,748 Times in 21,630 Posts
|
Quote:
I know, "plan to throw one away..." Fred was Right, said Fred. Perhaps I should upload the original (un-cleaned) text, so you can see it yourself... & perhaps have a go. |
|
January 28th, 2018, 01:00 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13,127
Thanks: 97,765
Thanked 324,779 Times in 12,802 Posts
|
It might already be known that @ Pinüps.dk, there are photoset references(with no 2-letter prefix code) that have 4 digit codes and some that have 6 digit codes. Some of these photosets are the work of Allan Sass. However there some of these photosets that are the work of other photographers that would usually have a 2-letter prefix code proceeding the numbers.
For example: The work of Jean Rougeron @ Pinüps.dk usually has a 2-letter prefix code of JA proceeding the numbers of the photoset reference. Photoset reference 002840(Ruth Gleeson's photoset which is presumably the work of Jean Rougeron) has no 2-letter prefix code proceeding the numbers. There are other examples of the work of Peter Flodqvist(which usually has a 2-letter prefix code of PF proceeding the numbers of the photoset reference) has no 2-letter prefix code proceeding the numbers. -- Something that also might already be known about model names; a model's name credited to a photoset(@ Pinüps.dk or elsewhere) may not always be her most known name. Sometimes the name a model was using at the time the photoset was taken is the name attributed to the photoset. The name a model is credited as @ Pinüps.dk may be different that the model's VEF thread title name. For example: Anna Karlsson(Pinüps.dk) AKA Lorna Mayfield(VEF) |
January 28th, 2018, 01:10 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13,127
Thanks: 97,765
Thanked 324,779 Times in 12,802 Posts
|
[Wasn't sure if this project was for ID'ing the unknowns @ Pinüps.dk and/or for known models(with perhaps different AKAs) who have content @ both VEF/Pinüps.dk, so feel free to remove if necessary]
--- Pascale Vital @ SässPhotography/Pinüps.dk: (1 photoset from Jean Rougeron - JA0011) (JA0011_0 - JA0011_4) And here she is @ VEF... As Conny with pics posted by svga and referenced by effCup: http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...0&postcount=23 http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...7&postcount=60 As Fleur de Lis'e with pics posted by martsm and referenced by johnmcwhatsit: http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=180 http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...2&postcount=50 There are also several posts @ VEF with name references of Pascale Vital, however I'm unsure if she is the same as the model listed @ Pinüps.dk. (she is mostly wearing sunglassses in her Jean Rougeron photoset) Last edited by miri; January 29th, 2018 at 12:04 AM.. Reason: typos |
January 28th, 2018, 03:23 AM | #10 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,135
Thanks: 226,717
Thanked 356,748 Times in 21,630 Posts
|
Re. the loss of leading zeros (due to Excel):
I've been re-looking at the raw data & have improved my regular expressions so that it'd be a bit less manual work to re-do the data into columns (mostly), but the thing is that I think the only way to prevent Excel stripping the leading zeros is to put a ' before them, and unlike where one does that manually within Excel, if I do that to the text file prior to importing into/opening with Excel (that's the only reasonable/manageable way, given the quantity), then they remain visible within excel. That is: Excel then doesn't treat them as "special" characters. So: that way keeps the leading zeros but also prepends a '. So I still wonder whether it's really worth all the effort of re-doing the data? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|