|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
September 21st, 2016, 07:39 AM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 152
Thanks: 1,601
Thanked 1,560 Times in 140 Posts
|
Quote:
But the idea that simply looking at the obvious edits doesn't constitute proof of fakery is just silly. |
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to leviathan0999 For This Useful Post: |
September 21st, 2016, 07:51 AM | #32 | ||||
Former Staff
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 113,764
Thanks: 259,872
Thanked 1,139,202 Times in 113,885 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Let's be honest here he found an image that looked like it was the original. It's hardly common for someone to fake an image in that way. Almost the reverse of most other fakes on the web, other than airbrushing. Quote:
Quote:
It's really time to move on from this personal obsession and let this total non-issue to most of us just die a natural. The next fake will be no doubt be along shortly.
__________________
RIP Doctor Who
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 23 November 1963 to 25 December 2017, sacrificed on the altar of identity politics. The show is dead to me, but my DVD's live on If you can re-up dead links please consider adding this to your signature. It helps when looking at reports of dead posts. Please PM me re any dead images although it is likely if it is outside Celebs I may no longer have the content |
||||
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Wendigo For This Useful Post: |
September 21st, 2016, 04:33 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 152
Thanks: 1,601
Thanked 1,560 Times in 140 Posts
|
Since the fake has now been removed from the "legitimate" thread, and the legitimate ones returned, I have no more complaint.
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to leviathan0999 For This Useful Post: |
September 21st, 2016, 05:09 PM | #34 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,216
Thanks: 18,391
Thanked 12,680 Times in 1,147 Posts
|
The thread served it's purpose. Some of us wondered why the "real" looked fake and the "fake" looked real. Now we know the answer.
__________________
Cock A Doodle Doo! Last edited by Sirch; September 21st, 2016 at 05:14 PM.. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sirch For This Useful Post: |
September 21st, 2016, 07:16 PM | #35 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts
|
It always gives me that bit more proof of pix being genuine when the celeb in question launches such law suits or as they called this one "cease & desist" order, as then you know that the person knows they posed for them, and doesn't want them seen by the whole world. But having already had them floating around the net for two weeks, that will now never happen....
Now if that cctv footage of Dannii Minogue & her lap dancer friend could resurface for a couple of weeks again, before getting removed... like it did before anyone I've ever spoken to could see it the first time around..... lol.
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible! |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post: |
September 22nd, 2016, 01:48 AM | #36 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,216
Thanks: 18,391
Thanked 12,680 Times in 1,147 Posts
|
Making a fuss always makes things worse. It's a lesson people never seem to learn.
__________________
Cock A Doodle Doo! |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sirch For This Useful Post: |
September 22nd, 2016, 02:34 AM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 911
Thanks: 1,672
Thanked 5,436 Times in 866 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to fordprefect739 For This Useful Post: |
September 22nd, 2016, 11:10 AM | #38 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 979
Thanks: 2,869
Thanked 14,289 Times in 974 Posts
|
I haven't read any stories about this, so I'm just speculating here. I'm wondering if her lawyers may also represent other celebs as well. If so, they may be trying to make an example of the website that posted these and send a message to anyone else who may be considering posting "owned" pics of a star. However, they can't stop the paparazzi from snapping her. Especially if she continues to choose not to wear underwear, apparently a habit of hers based on some past photos as well.
If my theory is correct (and I'm no lawyer), Miss Watson isn't being well represented by her legal team. Instead, it could be more of an agency decision who may be more concerned with their other stars and preventing any future potential scandals from coming to light. EDIT: I just read a brief article about this. I'm amused by the claim they make: Quote:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/20/em...aunchy-photos/ Last edited by JCat; September 22nd, 2016 at 11:26 AM.. |
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to JCat For This Useful Post: |
September 22nd, 2016, 12:53 PM | #39 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,216
Thanks: 18,391
Thanked 12,680 Times in 1,147 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Cock A Doodle Doo! |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sirch For This Useful Post: |
September 23rd, 2016, 01:01 AM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 911
Thanks: 1,672
Thanked 5,436 Times in 866 Posts
|
This pic isn't really nudity though. It's a bit suggestive but still not nudity.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fordprefect739 For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|