White supremacy the greatest threat

[ellpieski]

[IMG][/IMG]

[oldjones]

Originally Posted by ellpieski

Then you are still false. Leftists continue to equate the American Indian as "noble and peace loving environmentalists". YOU equated that with falsehood.

The original quote is true.

Your reply claiming it is false, is false.

That reads like a child's riddle. Do please quote me directly, rather than merely telling me whatever you think I said is false; I cannot consider you an authority on my thinking or on the accuracy of an unspecified statement.

Nor can I hope to figure what you consider the 'original quote', given the number of quotes in this branch of the thread.

As for your bogeyman Leftists, you're the one tells us what they think and then refutes them here. So far none seem to be following this thread.

Once again: It seems the European invaders and the Americans they displaced and 'ethnically cleansed' were equally bad people, guilty of owning slaves.

[ellpieski]

Originally Posted by oldjones

That reads like a child's riddle. Do please quote me directly, rather than merely telling me whatever you think I said is false; I cannot consider you an authority on my thinking or on the accuracy of an unspecified statement.

Nor can I hope to figure what you consider the 'original quote', given the number of quotes in this branch of the thread.

As for your bogeyman Leftists, you're the one tells us what they think and then refutes them here. So far none seem to be following this thread.

Once again: It seems the European invaders and the Americans they displaced and 'ethnically cleansed' were equally bad people, guilty of owning slaves.

You continue to not understand your own words.

Originally Posted by 96Cav View Post
They would steal women and children from defeated foes(tribes). Creepy stuff. This notion that they were all singing kumbaya smoking peace pipes is just leftist revisionism.

As false and stupid as the notion that slave-owning European immigrants were somehow superior to those 'true' Americans.

You have claimed that the historical fact of the slave owning activity and violent behavior of the American Indian is false. You have done so by equating those historical facts as being equivalent to the false pretense of the inherent superiority of one race over another. Your claim that the falsehood of race superiority is equivalent to the truth of proven historical fact is false.

Do you understand English? Is is it your native language? Because you do not understand your own words.

[oldjones]

Originally Posted by ellpieski

[editted] You continue to not understand your own words.
You have claimed that the historical fact of the slave owning activity and violent behavior of the American Indian is false. You have done so by equating those historical facts as being equivalent to the false pretense of the inherent superiority of one race over another. Your claim that the falsehood of race superiority is equivalent to the truth of proven historical fact is false.

Do you understand English? Is is it your native language? Because you do not understand your own words.

Thank you for telling me what I said. I'm sorry you didn't understand it. I'll simplify for you:
Slave-owning 'Americans' and slave-owning 'Europeans' are/were equally bad 'peoples', because slavery is bad. Got it now?


Thanks for using the adjective 'native' in it's classic meaning. In this thread native Americans call themselves 'Europeans' to distinguish themselves from indigenous peoples — and from people actually born in Europe — whom they choose to call 'Native Americans'. And they suggest the difference makes the one superior to the other.



If the original post about pre-European slavery in the Americas was merely an attempt to share a historical fact, please forgive my impulse to underline its ugly truth: Black, Yellow, Brown, Red or White, European, Asian or American, humans are all the same: equally capable of reprehensible cruelty to other humans.

[ellpieski]

Originally Posted by oldjones

Thank you for telling me what I said. I'm sorry you didn't understand it. I'll simplify for you:
Slave-owning 'Americans' and slave-owning 'Europeans' are/were equally bad 'peoples', because slavery is bad. Got it now?


Thanks for using the adjective 'native' in it's classic meaning. In this thread native Americans call themselves 'Europeans' to distinguish themselves from indigenous peoples — and from people actually born in Europe — whom they choose to call 'Native Americans'. And they suggest the difference makes the one superior to the other.



If the original post about pre-European slavery in the Americas was merely an attempt to share a historical fact, please forgive my impulse to underline its ugly truth: Black, Yellow, Brown, Red or White, European, Asian or American, humans are all the same: equally capable of reprehensible cruelty to other humans.

Your welcome. It was a pleasure to enlighten you on the use of the English language.

Despite your weak attempt to claim you said or implied something else, you didnt.

As for the reprehensible state of slavery, you made no such claim in your original statement. You simply implied the falsehood of the OP.

It is nice that you now think your NEW statement somehow absolves the falsehood or your original statement, but that also is false. Also, your definition of what native Americans call themselves in this thread is false. We call ourselves Americans.

Got it now? I always did.

You didnt, dont, and wont.

[FrankDobe]

[FrankDobe]

[ellpieski]

black supremacists and racists like frank support the murder of white people
[IMG][/IMG]

[ellpieski]

Saint Floyd of Fentanyl killed himself

[IMG][/IMG]

[ellpieski]

Another good black man betrayed by his white supremacist black wife

[IMG][/IMG]
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5yFI..._web_copy_link