|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 3rd, 2023, 06:21 PM | #1 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,152
Thanks: 26,126
Thanked 39,846 Times in 3,135 Posts
|
The Great Big "Is it, or isnt it" Investigation Thread
Hi all, We dont seem to have a goto Fake/Edit/Wrong woman Celebrity Thread, so, since I've been happily looking into those things the last 30 years or so, I thought this would be a good place.
I invite everyone who has a suspect image to post it here with whatever evidence either way you can drum up to prove/disprove the pic/s. Please dont waste our time with obvious fakes or just plain stupid shit. IMO, real soon now, AI will start being used to great effect to edit old photos in a realistic way (instead of the cartoon stupid we have now). That's going to present amazing possibilities/problems in the near future. Imagine the potential to "uncensor" old film clips like Teri Hatcher in Heaven's Prisoners, or to reverse the blue filter on the Salma Hayek Ask the Dust ocean scene. Anyway, welcome, and have a good argument over whether it's real or not, in female celebland
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience" |
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cylnz For This Useful Post: |
|
May 3rd, 2023, 06:24 PM | #2 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,152
Thanks: 26,126
Thanked 39,846 Times in 3,135 Posts
|
no 1. Saved as Kim Basinger from a usenet post, mid '90s, supposedly from 1990-92 Germany.
Base Pic: pic rotated to what seems normal: evidence of non-editing:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience" |
May 3rd, 2023, 06:33 PM | #3 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,152
Thanks: 26,126
Thanked 39,846 Times in 3,135 Posts
|
From looking at the pic from various modes/layers/zooms it all looks like it's not been mucked about. Even at 2000% zoom the pixels all grade the same, no smudge tool, no cut-ins, no resolution variations.
I dont see any reason to think it's not a single image. Now, the question is, is it Kim?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience" |
October 1st, 2023, 11:07 PM | #4 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,152
Thanks: 26,126
Thanked 39,846 Times in 3,135 Posts
|
Weird Bellucci
Here's a very common, but technically weird as hell Monica Bellucci pic.
original as downloaded: and this is 1 operation "equalize": what the fuck is that? here is the equalized layer + original layer on vivid light: other modes and layer extractions: Looking at it, and considering, I dont think the water reflection ever really existed. I think Monica was just standing there fully nude and the photographer cropped her at hip level and used photo manipulation to knock out the entire background set, (including some sort of mirror or framework) and digitally added in a water reflection, after "improving" her body shape. If anyone has a better idea, share it, because that's the only series of edits I can get to make sense.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "How'd you like the my foot in your ass experience" |
|
|