Lindsay Lohan in P***boy January-February 2012 (1-2—2012) USA

**arun123** · December 9th, 2011, 02:54 PM

Apologies for the watermarks. Better versions are welcome.

**imtrying** · December 9th, 2011, 11:27 PM

This isn't really a complaint, but hasn't she already done the naked Marilyn shtick for another magazine? Is this her career now, being a Marilyn Monroe impersonator?

**flooooo** · December 10th, 2011, 12:23 AM

well to be onest i think the other one was even more revealing then this uber softcore PB set pitty i was suspecting a better set

**pharoahegypt** · December 10th, 2011, 12:42 AM

conclusion...........

great images; shame she had to do them for the bunny mag......

but as per every 'celebrity' bunny shoot of late...... it's too tame (ie no pubic area shot), has way too much airbrushing, uses a way too over used idea (marilyn), and she's so made up it hardly even looks like miss lohan in any case........

..................just my opinion, but one im sure others will share.

finally; anyone else recall the lousy job they did with kelly brook..?? but then she went out and did a shoot for a supposedly lesser mag.. and for far less money.....?? bet everyone has those pix in their collections...... but not the bunny ones...??

**KurtBarlow** · December 10th, 2011, 12:56 AM

With the make-up, the hair and the freckles photo-shopped off I think she looks more like Rose McGowan than Lindsay Lohan. They paid $1 million for this?

teabags · December 10th, 2011, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pharoahegypt

conclusion...........

great images; shame she had to do them for the bunny mag......

but as per every 'celebrity' bunny shoot of late...... it's too tame (ie no pubic area shot), has way too much airbrushing, uses a way too over used idea (marilyn), and she's so made up it hardly even looks like miss lohan in any case........

..................just my opinion, but one im sure others will share.

finally; anyone else recall the lousy job they did with kelly brook..?? but then she went out and did a shoot for a supposedly lesser mag.. and for far less money.....?? bet everyone has those pix in their collections...... but not the bunny ones...??

i agree with the assessment of the pics, but i still like them..she has a great body glad she's showing it off, pity theyre so tame and look fake kind of, but then thats PB for you, they stopped doing really hot pics i think some time ago for the more fake plasticy looking types.

pasman · December 10th, 2011, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtBarlow

With the make-up, the hair and the freckles photo-shopped off I think she looks more like Rose McGowan than Lindsay Lohan. They paid $1 million for this?

Not really the best work! Wonder if a video will accompany the shoot... Some of the celeb shoot do ---

others no...

scottx · December 10th, 2011, 03:56 AM

Typical P***b** crap air brushed/ photo shopped, lame MM ripoff..... could of atleast given us a vagina shot!

Blaxninja · December 10th, 2011, 04:14 AM

Well even if she had everything air brushed she still looks great....

vanhelsing68 · December 10th, 2011, 06:19 AM

Thats the hype of it. Ohh looky at the Lindsay new photo shoot for playboy. She is showing it all. Nothing but a big pile of BS. I think Hugh will regret ever shooting her for his great mag. He is going to loose alot of money on this one. This photo spread wasm't worth a $1 million dollars. If I paid her that kind of money you better believe there would be one or more pussy shots.

December 9th, 2011, 02:54 PM	#1
arun123 Vintage Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Animal Farm Posts: 547 Thanks: 996 Thanked 18,909 Times in 541 Posts	Lindsay Lohan in Pboy January-February 2012 (1-2—2012) USA* Apologies for the watermarks. Better versions are welcome. __________________ On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

December 10th, 2011, 12:42 AM	#4
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 4,491 Thanks: 10,176 Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts	conclusion........... great images; shame she had to do them for the bunny mag...... but as per every 'celebrity' bunny shoot of late...... it's too tame (ie no pubic area shot), has way too much airbrushing, uses a way too over used idea (marilyn), and she's so made up it hardly even looks like miss lohan in any case........ ..................just my opinion, but one im sure others will share. finally; anyone else recall the lousy job they did with kelly brook..?? but then she went out and did a shoot for a supposedly lesser mag.. and for far less money.....?? bet everyone has those pix in their collections...... but not the bunny ones...?? __________________ Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

December 10th, 2011, 12:56 AM	#5
KurtBarlow Vintage Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Alberta, Canada Posts: 2,640 Thanks: 3,043 Thanked 30,298 Times in 2,636 Posts	With the make-up, the hair and the freckles photo-shopped off I think she looks more like Rose McGowan than Lindsay Lohan. They paid $1 million for this? __________________ The Bible looks like it started out as a game of Mad Libs. - Bill Maher

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

December 9th, 2011, 11:27 PM	#2
imtrying Vintage Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,068 Thanks: 14,832 Thanked 17,239 Times in 1,043 Posts	This isn't really a complaint, but hasn't she already done the naked Marilyn shtick for another magazine? Is this her career now, being a Marilyn Monroe impersonator?

December 10th, 2011, 12:23 AM	#3
flooooo Vintage Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 460 Thanks: 2,583 Thanked 14,085 Times in 485 Posts	well to be onest i think the other one was even more revealing then this uber softcore PB set pitty i was suspecting a better set

December 10th, 2011, 03:56 AM	#8
scottx Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: New Jersey USA... gotta a problem wit dat? Posts: 172 Thanks: 708 Thanked 1,876 Times in 165 Posts	Typical P*b crap air brushed/ photo shopped, lame MM ripoff..... could of atleast given us a vagina shot!

December 10th, 2011, 04:14 AM	#9
Blaxninja Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 1 Thanks: 0 Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post	Well even if she had everything air brushed she still looks great....

December 10th, 2011, 06:19 AM	#10
vanhelsing68 Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 2 Thanks: 0 Thanked 11 Times in 2 Posts	Thats the hype of it. Ohh looky at the Lindsay new photo shoot for playboy. She is showing it all. Nothing but a big pile of BS. I think Hugh will regret ever shooting her for his great mag. He is going to loose alot of money on this one. This photo spread wasm't worth a $1 million dollars. If I paid her that kind of money you better believe there would be one or more pussy shots.