Emma Watson Fake??? - Page 2

olaf_69 · September 8th, 2016, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirch

I don't get it. Why does the original non-xray look fake? If you zoom in, the pixels are different around the nipple area. Or am I seeing nipple tape underneath her blouse?

It's like they found out after the fact the original could be x-rayed. So they doctored it up in Photoshop and re-released the photo.

You're looking at an image that's been edited to remove nipples friend.

**Sirch** · September 8th, 2016, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by olaf_69

You're looking at an image that's been edited to remove nipples friend.

Thanks for the explanation. Why would anyone do that? Is the "original" really see through then?

**pharoahegypt** · September 8th, 2016, 09:03 PM

It's appearing to be the way for once... Going not only on the discussion here, but also discussions on several other forums where the images have been gone into in fine detail.

It does seem that the two images with the nipples on show are real, and it's the one with them hidden that has been shopped.... Again, only going by discussions from various sources....

fordprefect739 · September 9th, 2016, 06:50 PM

A lot of effort for nipples poking through a shirt.

**Sirch** · September 10th, 2016, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fordprefect739

A lot of effort for nipples poking through a shirt.

it's about the challenge.

leviathan0999 · September 18th, 2016, 08:50 PM

It's certainly not impossible that the greatest faker in history edited pixel-by-pixel to fake the two very similar but not identical shots of Emma with her nipples visible through a sheer shirt and poking out. They'd have had to edit it pixel-by-pixel, and known a way to give the pictures convincing EXIF data, but I doubt that's the case.

There is absolutely no doubt, though, that the unrevealing shot in Sozelle's post is a fake. Not just a fake, but a childishly obvious, inept one. As several posters, myself included, have shown above, anybody making the most basic examination, simply zooming in on it, can see where it's been edited.

And yet, with that clearly visible proof, it remains the official position of VEF that the obvious fake is real, and the flawless original posts are fake. It's baffling.

**Wendigo** · September 19th, 2016, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leviathan0999

And yet, with that clearly visible proof, it remains the official position of VEF that the obvious fake is real, and the flawless original posts are fake. It's baffling.

There is no official VEF position.
To try and explain this simply, far too many threads have been ruined with pages of members arguing over whether a picture is real or not so now if there is ANY doubt we move the posts to the discussion threads where those that want to can carry on their verbal ding dongs whilst others can enjoy the rest of the thread's content .... simples.

leviathan0999 · September 19th, 2016, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wendigo

There is no official VEF position.
To try and explain this simply, far too many threads have been ruined with pages of members arguing over whether a picture is real or not so now if there is ANY doubt we move the posts to the discussion threads where those that want to can carry on their verbal ding dongs whilst others can enjoy the rest of the thread's content .... simples.

There is absolutely nothing to indicate that these two images are fake, and a great deal to support that they're real.

There is, on the other hand, absolutely no doubt that sozelle's post below is not merely a fake, but a childishly amateurish one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sozelle

Original to the fakes above:

Mod Edit
Earlier posts moved to fakes thread
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t47...ded-rules.html

Please note that without real evidence this post stays in situ.

Yet, despite not just "real evidence," but absolute proof that that post is fake, there it sits in the "legitimate" thread because a moderator or administrator decided to keep it there in the face of its irrefutably proven fakery, while two images that show no sign whatever of being fake are consigned here.

**Wendigo** · September 19th, 2016, 05:12 PM

And the image you are so incensed about is linked to this thread so what's the big issue?
Members can decide for themselves based on the evidence what they want to believe and what images they want to look at; this thread is a prime example of the reason why the discussion threads were created. Basically it's just another storm in a teacup of interest to just a few.

Banpan · September 19th, 2016, 10:06 PM

Apparently they are real and I was wrong. Sorry.

September 8th, 2016, 09:03 PM	#13
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 4,491 Thanks: 10,176 Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts	It's appearing to be the way for once... Going not only on the discussion here, but also discussions on several other forums where the images have been gone into in fine detail. It does seem that the two images with the nipples on show are real, and it's the one with them hidden that has been shopped.... Again, only going by discussions from various sources.... __________________ Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

September 19th, 2016, 05:12 PM	#19
Wendigo Former Staff Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Blighty Posts: 113,771 Thanks: 259,876 Thanked 1,139,238 Times in 113,890 Posts	And the image you are so incensed about is linked to this thread so what's the big issue? Members can decide for themselves based on the evidence what they want to believe and what images they want to look at; this thread is a prime example of the reason why the discussion threads were created. Basically it's just another storm in a teacup of interest to just a few. __________________ RIP Doctor Who To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 23 November 1963 to 25 December 2017, sacrificed on the altar of identity politics. The show is dead to me, but my DVD's live on If you can re-up dead links please consider adding this to your signature. It helps when looking at reports of dead posts. Please PM me re any dead images although it is likely if it is outside Celebs I may no longer have the content

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

September 9th, 2016, 06:50 PM	#14
fordprefect739 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 911 Thanks: 1,672 Thanked 5,436 Times in 866 Posts	A lot of effort for nipples poking through a shirt.

September 18th, 2016, 08:50 PM	#16
leviathan0999 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 152 Thanks: 1,601 Thanked 1,560 Times in 140 Posts	It's certainly not impossible that the greatest faker in history edited pixel-by-pixel to fake the two very similar but not identical shots of Emma with her nipples visible through a sheer shirt and poking out. They'd have had to edit it pixel-by-pixel, and known a way to give the pictures convincing EXIF data, but I doubt that's the case. There is absolutely no doubt, though, that the unrevealing shot in Sozelle's post is a fake. Not just a fake, but a childishly obvious, inept one. As several posters, myself included, have shown above, anybody making the most basic examination, simply zooming in on it, can see where it's been edited. And yet, with that clearly visible proof, it remains the official position of VEF that the obvious fake is real, and the flawless original posts are fake. It's baffling.

September 19th, 2016, 10:06 PM	#20
Banpan Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 466 Thanks: 6,358 Thanked 7,279 Times in 458 Posts	Apparently they are real and I was wrong. Sorry.