Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Classic Celebs, Beauty & Elegance > Classic Celebrities > Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2016, 12:01 AM   #21
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 3,669
Thanks: 8,570
Thanked 29,658 Times in 3,408 Posts
pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+
Default

You do know that anyone can make one of those exif data sheets up easily, don't you? I could've taken that and changed a few details in just a few minutes if I wasn't so tired..

But still convinced now that the original images showing her nips are the real mccoy, not fakes; not that it really matters either way compared to world famine, middle eastern wars, and the uk labour party shenanigans..... lol.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 01:34 PM   #22
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 3,669
Thanks: 8,570
Thanked 29,658 Times in 3,408 Posts
pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+
Default

The plot thickens....?? Posted remarkably noticeably to TMZ....

Emma Watson got justice by siccing her legal team on a site that posted racy pics of her in a see-through top without a bra.
Emma's lawyers sent a cease and desist letter to the website, Celeb Jihad -- which somehow acquired private photos of Emma in a sheer top. The outfit exposed her breasts and nipples.
Her legal team put it in pretty simple terms -- Emma owns the pics and the copyright on them, so Celeb Jihad was breaking the law by posting them. According to the letter, the photos were taken by Emma's stylist, who then gave Emma all rights.
Message received loud and clear -- shortly after the site got the letter, Emma's pics were removed.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 02:05 PM   #23
Sirch
Vintage Member
 
Sirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,213
Thanks: 18,382
Thanked 9,541 Times in 1,120 Posts
Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+Sirch 25000+
Default

Well if the image was hacked and she wants it down so be it. Civil case will probably follow. But it's forever "out there" for the taking.
__________________
Cock A Doodle Doo!
Sirch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sirch For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 05:24 PM   #24
fordprefect739
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 907
Thanks: 1,672
Thanked 4,261 Times in 855 Posts
fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+
Default

1. OK. I'm convinced 100%. The see through is real.

2. This is way too much effort for nipples poking through a shirt.

Last edited by fordprefect739; 09-20-2016 at 06:27 PM..
fordprefect739 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fordprefect739 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 06:05 PM   #25
leviathan0999
Senior Member
 
leviathan0999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 140
Thanks: 1,229
Thanked 1,288 Times in 124 Posts
leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendigo View Post
And the image you are so incensed about is linked to this thread so what's the big issue?
The fake image remains in the "Emma Watson" thread, with nothing on it to indicate to newbies that it's a fake, and a "Mod edit" claiming it deserves to stay in the main thread unless there's evidence that it's fake -- which there is, amply, and that's not just my opinion.

This thread, which seems to incense you, consists of everyone else saying "But there's no indication that the two revealing pictures are fakes, and absolute proof the other one is," and you insisting that all is right with the world.
leviathan0999 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to leviathan0999 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 06:18 PM   #26
Sam Spade
Administrator
 
Sam Spade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,904
Thanks: 87,756
Thanked 200,953 Times in 11,569 Posts
Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+Sam Spade 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathan0999 View Post
The fake image remains in the "Emma Watson" thread, with nothing on it to indicate to newbies that it's a fake, and a "Mod edit" claiming it deserves to stay in the main thread unless there's evidence that it's fake -- which there is, amply, and that's not just my opinion.

This thread, which seems to incense you, consists of everyone else saying "But there's no indication that the two revealing pictures are fakes, and absolute proof the other one is," and you insisting that all is right with the world.
"Proof" in the case of fakes should consist of the original, unfaked image.
__________________


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


We recommend you use a variety of hosts for your pictures


Read and follow the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and everything will be sweet.

Use the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
button to show appreciation.

Use the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
facility or the A-Z's before starting a new thread.


Play nice.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


If you find any dead images in any of my celebrity posts, please PM me with details.

Sam Spade is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sam Spade For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 06:29 PM   #27
fordprefect739
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 907
Thanks: 1,672
Thanked 4,261 Times in 855 Posts
fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+fordprefect739 10000+
Default

The lawyers have apparently confirmed that the see through is real.

They don't go after all the fakers. They go after the real ones.
fordprefect739 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to fordprefect739 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 06:48 PM   #28
Wendigo
Super Moderator
 
Wendigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 22,577
Thanks: 105,028
Thanked 315,553 Times in 22,451 Posts
Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+Wendigo 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathan0999 View Post
The fake image remains in the "Emma Watson" thread, with nothing on it to indicate to newbies that it's a fake, and a "Mod edit" claiming it deserves to stay in the main thread unless there's evidence that it's fake -- which there is, amply, and that's not just my opinion.

This thread, which seems to incense you, consists of everyone else saying "But there's no indication that the two revealing pictures are fakes, and absolute proof the other one is," and you insisting that all is right with the world.
Incense
Sadly this thread just mildly amuses me as PhEg intimates on a scale of 1 to 100 of importance to most people it barely registers
As Sam says there is no actual "proof " just different opinions.

The image you refer to had already been removed prior to your post quoted above and the original images put back in place.
__________________
If you see any of my posts with dead images please send me a PM and I'll try to locate and re-up them
Wendigo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wendigo For This Useful Post:
Old 09-20-2016, 07:12 PM   #29
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 3,669
Thanks: 8,570
Thanked 29,658 Times in 3,408 Posts
pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+
Default

Would the presence of a very apt avatar have any bearing on leviathan0999 wanting irrevocable proof that the image is genuine...? lol.


Like those of us more used to these discussions, though it would be nice to see Emma's chesticles in all their glory, or even this way is nice, it don't matter too much....
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old 09-21-2016, 08:34 AM   #30
leviathan0999
Senior Member
 
leviathan0999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 140
Thanks: 1,229
Thanked 1,288 Times in 124 Posts
leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+leviathan0999 5000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pharoahegypt View Post
Would the presence of a very apt avatar have any bearing on leviathan0999 wanting irrevocable proof that the image is genuine...? lol.


Like those of us more used to these discussions, though it would be nice to see Emma's chesticles in all their glory, or even this way is nice, it don't matter too much....
It's not about wanting proof. It's about integrity.

Absolutely every picture you will ever see on the Internet is just pixels. A sufficiently talented and patient individual could manually build a perfectly credible picture of absolutely anything you can imagine, carefully selecting and placing every single individual pixel, one pixel at a time. That's why claiming that _any_ picture is "proven" to be "real" is a mug's game, and you'll note I've never made that claim about the revealing photos originally posted. I believe they're genuine because there is absolutely nothing to indicate that they aren't, and the recent news that Emma Watson's people sent a takedown notice over them supports that belief... But it's still belief, not knowledge.

But the one sozelle posted, claiming it to be the original, is a clearly proven, demonstrated fake. anybody can zoom in on the picture in any image viewer, and see the edits as plain and clear as if they were done with construction paper and a glue stick.

Promoting that fake image as real is a stain on VEF's integrity.

I don't like hacking of people's private images. I want to see Emma Watson naked as much as the next guy, and more than most, but not by violating her privacy, breaking into her (or her friends' and employees') private accounts to steal pictures.

But you don't combat hacking by polluting the discussion with fakes. You don't undo sleazery by shedding your integrity.
leviathan0999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.