Message for Cash Host posters - Page 2

**svga** · 08-24-2011, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozzyozzy

Incongruous that Inglorious warns and criticises Filesonic users, when the forum
advertises Filesonic on the top of this page!

Forum owners and forum moderators are not the same. The possibility to criticise is at least something which makes VEF not the worst forum

08-24-2011, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozzyozzy

Incongruous that Inglorious warns and criticises Filesonic users, when the forum
advertises Filesonic on the top of this page!

I didnt ask for it to be there

**Ozzyozzy** · 08-25-2011, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svga

Forum owners and forum moderators are not the same. The possibility to criticise is at least something which makes VEF not the worst forum

Thanks, agree and admire the fact we can make such comments...Cheers

**rotobott** · 09-06-2011, 07:31 PM

I was just thinking, as I failed miserably to download a single 100mb filesonic file, that since no one is allowed to mirror films and clips, (unless you manage to find a major upgrade), a vast and growing swathe of VEF will be inaccesible to most forumites, that's sad.

heretic(666) · 10-20-2011, 06:12 PM

Message for filesonic oron and w upload from the UK members.
thanks for nothing

**donnalangtonukmode** · 10-27-2011, 10:35 PM

I think its time the forum makes a decision to have a one file host and no more. A host we can all down load from as free users or as members to which we can all subscribe too.

The thought of having endless file host accounts just to get one file is a joke and an expletive one at that. I know I signed to Oron for one month & got one tinny file at the cost of around £9. Yet RS is like £6 a month.

I nominate RS since it works for me as a subscriber. More so since I use my pay pal account to top up my rapids. Yet all these other cowboys want your card detail & that’s not on.

Yes people will complain about RS being slow for free users. But if everyone was using the same file host and we all excepted nothing in life is free. More so since RS was the norm when I joined this forum. We would have less members complaining about Johnny come lately file hosts who’ve done nothing for this forum but instil unwanted stress.

Yes RS maybe slow if your not prepared to put your hand in your pocket. But FS & a few others hosts are giving us nothing but headaches in return. While bringing the best #### forum on the net into disrepute…

We should at least PM everyone and have a pole to find out what everyone thinks…

The king has spoke

**pharoahegypt** · 10-28-2011, 01:21 AM

I hate to disagree with you after all this time donnalangton; but i dont think just one upload site could work; both in terms of traffic and in terms of members own systems or download limitations. at least two as a minimum id suggest should work; say MU & RS, as much as both have their justified critics from time to time; they still remain the most reliable in my own personal opinion. I often find RS slow on my dongle, while MU often freezes at 99%; whereas they both work fine on a Broadband connection I also get use of on a weekend. Most of the others either dont hold files for long enough, or just dont work for other reasons half the time. Keeping MU & RS would at least give members a choice.

Hey; I managed to give my tuppence without swearing or defaming anyone...!!!! Bloody Hell!!!! (well, what's a teeny little swear word between friends?)

**DTravel** · 10-28-2011, 01:30 AM

I think it would be a very bad idea to allow only one file host here. As we've all seen host sites change over time. They change their policies, the laws change, they grow too fast and their service tanks, etc. Limiting posters to just one file host leaves the forum vulnerable to those changes.

Second, it ignore the reality that some of those bad hosts are paying VEF's owner for ads and access. So even if it was decided to restrict posters to only one file host, it wouldn't be RapidShare or MegaUpload.

**Brecht** · 10-28-2011, 10:52 AM

They do change but RS and MU didn't change too much in all those years to not be the standard hosters. With every day, more movies are getting less accessible to members thanks to horrible hosters like Oron, Wupload and Filesonic.

**donnalangtonukmode** · 10-28-2011, 02:21 PM

Your right guys, MU has never given me a problem but we can agree there are those who do and their being used all too frequently.

If anything we need to know why FS is causing so much problems for so many of us. Especially now the forum is advertising them as the main host. Which I don’t have a problem with.
But no matter where you go on the net to find a fix all you end up with is frustration & wasted time.

I thought the junkies in my street where strung out….

10-20-2011, 06:12 PM	#15
heretic(666) Blocked! Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,023 Thanks: 6,524 Thanked 4,461 Times in 918 Posts	Message for filesonic oron and w upload from the UK members. thanks for nothing Last edited by heretic(666); 10-21-2011 at 07:21 PM.. Reason: spelling

10-27-2011, 10:35 PM	#16
donnalangtonukmode Big whoop, wanna fight about it. Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,461 Thanks: 12,778 Thanked 41,967 Times in 1,609 Posts	I think its time the forum makes a decision to have a one file host and no more. A host we can all down load from as free users or as members to which we can all subscribe too. The thought of having endless file host accounts just to get one file is a joke and an expletive one at that. I know I signed to Oron for one month & got one tinny file at the cost of around £9. Yet RS is like £6 a month. I nominate RS since it works for me as a subscriber. More so since I use my pay pal account to top up my rapids. Yet all these other cowboys want your card detail & that’s not on. Yes people will complain about RS being slow for free users. But if everyone was using the same file host and we all excepted nothing in life is free. More so since RS was the norm when I joined this forum. We would have less members complaining about Johnny come lately file hosts who’ve done nothing for this forum but instil unwanted stress. Yes RS maybe slow if your not prepared to put your hand in your pocket. But FS & a few others hosts are giving us nothing but headaches in return. While bringing the best #### forum on the net into disrepute… We should at least PM everyone and have a pole to find out what everyone thinks… The king has spoke __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-28-2011, 01:21 AM	#17
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 3,526 Thanks: 8,332 Thanked 28,235 Times in 3,274 Posts	I hate to disagree with you after all this time donnalangton; but i dont think just one upload site could work; both in terms of traffic and in terms of members own systems or download limitations. at least two as a minimum id suggest should work; say MU & RS, as much as both have their justified critics from time to time; they still remain the most reliable in my own personal opinion. I often find RS slow on my dongle, while MU often freezes at 99%; whereas they both work fine on a Broadband connection I also get use of on a weekend. Most of the others either dont hold files for long enough, or just dont work for other reasons half the time. Keeping MU & RS would at least give members a choice. Hey; I managed to give my tuppence without swearing or defaming anyone...!!!! Bloody Hell!!!! (well, what's a teeny little swear word between friends?) __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by pharoahegypt; 10-28-2011 at 01:25 AM.. Reason: changed grammar

10-28-2011, 01:30 AM	#18
DTravel InterDimensional Traveler Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Between universes, lost in another TV series project Posts: 11,204 Thanks: 8,437 Thanked 97,623 Times in 11,078 Posts	I think it would be a very bad idea to allow only one file host here. As we've all seen host sites change over time. They change their policies, the laws change, they grow too fast and their service tanks, etc. Limiting posters to just one file host leaves the forum vulnerable to those changes. Second, it ignore the reality that some of those bad hosts are paying VEF's owner for ads and access. So even if it was decided to restrict posters to only one file host, it wouldn't be RapidShare or MegaUpload. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. For Mods re hosts: Any non-screencaps dead post can be deleted, I won't be able to replace. I am replacing ImageBan hosted pics as time permits.

10-28-2011, 02:21 PM	#20
donnalangtonukmode Big whoop, wanna fight about it. Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,461 Thanks: 12,778 Thanked 41,967 Times in 1,609 Posts	Your right guys, MU has never given me a problem but we can agree there are those who do and their being used all too frequently. If anything we need to know why FS is causing so much problems for so many of us. Especially now the forum is advertising them as the main host. Which I don’t have a problem with. But no matter where you go on the net to find a fix all you end up with is frustration & wasted time. I thought the junkies in my street where strung out…. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

09-06-2011, 07:31 PM	#14
rotobott Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 15,307 Thanks: 74,707 Thanked 278,758 Times in 14,959 Posts	I was just thinking, as I failed miserably to download a single 100mb filesonic file, that since no one is allowed to mirror films and clips, (unless you manage to find a major upgrade), a vast and growing swathe of VEF will be inaccesible to most forumites, that's sad.

10-28-2011, 10:52 AM	#19
Brecht no war but class war Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: les années noires Posts: 6,947 Thanks: 117,586 Thanked 109,418 Times in 6,837 Posts	They do change but RS and MU didn't change too much in all those years to not be the standard hosters. With every day, more movies are getting less accessible to members thanks to horrible hosters like Oron, Wupload and Filesonic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode