Lorraine Kelly Nude Pictures ~ Real or Fake? - Page 3

jimsora · December 31st, 2008, 07:03 PM

Thought they were a lookalike at first, but when you look at the gums, i,m convinced its her. Dirty girl, love it.

**kiwi** · January 28th, 2009, 12:06 PM

Well, to start with they don't look like your normal 'fakes' - if they are fakes then the person who created them is a very skillful individual.

The scratches on the pix suggest they are originals from a classic camera - but this technique could have been created in the darkroom & these days with Photoshop.

I would like to believe they are genuine but I really can't understand why the British Media, in particularly the tabaloid press, did not at any point pick-up on the photos and (try to) crucify her as they do with most celebrities.

Kiwi

Mr Lucas · April 8th, 2009, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

I would like to believe they are genuine but I really can't understand why the British Media, in particularly the tabaloid press, did not at any point pick-up on the photos and (try to) crucify her as they do with most celebrities.

Kiwi

If she ever does anything to piss the tabloids off you can bet these pics will come up. But she's a very popular a likeable character with an undisguised saucy nature, so I suspect the tabloids see crucifying her, over something hardly sleazy in an respect, as pointless. The tabloids couldn't be that hypocritical could they?

Incubus11 · May 15th, 2009, 12:27 PM

Regarding the "is it real" full-frontal pic, moles are always a good give away. If you look at the pic closely, you can make out a mole or blemish on her neck just underneath her jawline on her left hand side. Comparing this to later shots which are definitely of Lorraine, she has just such a mole in exactly the same position on her neck. So I'd say yes, it is of her, probably taken sometime in the '80s, when she had yet to develop her more buxom and (arguably) more attractive figure.

**groovesection** · May 17th, 2009, 06:00 AM

Great point ^^

I think Lorraie has gotten better with age,she looks minging in that pic with her beaver out lol,But these days she looks great.
Same as Carol Vorderman,Certainly gotten better with age..Like a fine wine :P

kieran2211 · May 20th, 2009, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gs1

definitely her. compare the teeth in the top pics. identical

jimboy51 · June 11th, 2009, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spearce8

We definitely need HQ's of these.

might be her head but is it her body?

robeston · October 12th, 2009, 08:53 AM

You've convinced me. I didn't believe the pics were LK, as I know a lot of Scottish women and believe me a surprising number have similar facial characteristics. But the detailed work done here has won me over.

I absolutely love Lorraine. Those high-set tits of hers always give me a thrill for a start, but the thing that makes her so very sexy is her naturalness and humour and intelligence. You may say that what she does is often a bit shallow, but what do you and I do for cash that is so damned intellectual? She does her work with wit and charm and occasionally has a chance to show what's underneath. And I don't just mean the boobs and fantastic legs either. On reflection she may actually be, for me, the sexiest thing on UK tv, and next to Suzi Perry and Amanda Redman that's going a long way.

**freeman303** · March 2nd, 2010, 02:38 AM

There are two moles on her neck and an old scar on her chin.Also a pic of her from the same era ,same hair cut as well as a calender showing the falklands war.close up of her tank shot as well.

feinstein · June 11th, 2010, 10:18 PM

On the nude pics of Lorraine,where is the mole on her right tit??????

View Poll Results: The nude pictures
They are of Lorraine	545	75.80%
They are of a lookalike	112	15.58%
They are fakes	62	8.62%
Voters: 719. You may not vote on this poll

January 28th, 2009, 12:06 PM	#22
kiwi I'm a hornisod Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Here @ VEF Posts: 1,422 Thanks: 6,194 Thanked 69,682 Times in 1,447 Posts	interesting Well, to start with they don't look like your normal 'fakes' - if they are fakes then the person who created them is a very skillful individual. The scratches on the pix suggest they are originals from a classic camera - but this technique could have been created in the darkroom & these days with Photoshop. I would like to believe they are genuine but I really can't understand why the British Media, in particularly the tabaloid press, did not at any point pick-up on the photos and (try to) crucify her as they do with most celebrities. Kiwi __________________ Love All The People To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by kiwi; January 28th, 2009 at 12:09 PM..

May 17th, 2009, 06:00 AM	#25
groovesection Vintage Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Behind the Decks Posts: 1,902 Thanks: 5,342 Thanked 45,317 Times in 1,892 Posts	Great point ^^ I think Lorraie has gotten better with age,she looks minging in that pic with her beaver out lol,But these days she looks great. Same as Carol Vorderman,Certainly gotten better with age..Like a fine wine :P __________________ Please read the Forum To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

March 2nd, 2010, 02:38 AM	#29
freeman303 Vintage Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: NW ENGLAND Posts: 521 Thanks: 10,732 Thanked 15,616 Times in 519 Posts	How much proof do you need. There are two moles on her neck and an old scar on her chin.Also a pic of her from the same era ,same hair cut as well as a calender showing the falklands war.close up of her tank shot as well.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

December 31st, 2008, 07:03 PM	#21
jimsora Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 26 Thanks: 129 Thanked 86 Times in 14 Posts	Thought they were a lookalike at first, but when you look at the gums, i,m convinced its her. Dirty girl, love it.

May 15th, 2009, 12:27 PM	#24
Incubus11 Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 1 Thanks: 4 Thanked 10 Times in 1 Post	Regarding the "is it real" full-frontal pic, moles are always a good give away. If you look at the pic closely, you can make out a mole or blemish on her neck just underneath her jawline on her left hand side. Comparing this to later shots which are definitely of Lorraine, she has just such a mole in exactly the same position on her neck. So I'd say yes, it is of her, probably taken sometime in the '80s, when she had yet to develop her more buxom and (arguably) more attractive figure.

October 12th, 2009, 08:53 AM	#28
robeston Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 89 Thanks: 1,055 Thanked 594 Times in 78 Posts	You've convinced me. I didn't believe the pics were LK, as I know a lot of Scottish women and believe me a surprising number have similar facial characteristics. But the detailed work done here has won me over. I absolutely love Lorraine. Those high-set tits of hers always give me a thrill for a start, but the thing that makes her so very sexy is her naturalness and humour and intelligence. You may say that what she does is often a bit shallow, but what do you and I do for cash that is so damned intellectual? She does her work with wit and charm and occasionally has a chance to show what's underneath. And I don't just mean the boobs and fantastic legs either. On reflection she may actually be, for me, the sexiest thing on UK tv, and next to Suzi Perry and Amanda Redman that's going a long way.

June 11th, 2010, 10:18 PM	#30
feinstein Junior Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 9 Thanks: 906 Thanked 14 Times in 5 Posts	On the nude pics of Lorraine,where is the mole on her right tit??????