Lindsay Lohan in P***boy January-February 2012 (1-2—2012) USA

**arun123** · 12-09-2011, 02:54 PM

Apologies for the watermarks. Better versions are welcome.

**imtrying** · 12-09-2011, 11:27 PM

This isn't really a complaint, but hasn't she already done the naked Marilyn shtick for another magazine? Is this her career now, being a Marilyn Monroe impersonator?

**flooooo** · 12-10-2011, 12:23 AM

well to be onest i think the other one was even more revealing then this uber softcore PB set pitty i was suspecting a better set

**pharoahegypt** · 12-10-2011, 12:42 AM

conclusion...........

great images; shame she had to do them for the bunny mag......

but as per every 'celebrity' bunny shoot of late...... it's too tame (ie no pubic area shot), has way too much airbrushing, uses a way too over used idea (marilyn), and she's so made up it hardly even looks like miss lohan in any case........

..................just my opinion, but one im sure others will share.

finally; anyone else recall the lousy job they did with kelly brook..?? but then she went out and did a shoot for a supposedly lesser mag.. and for far less money.....?? bet everyone has those pix in their collections...... but not the bunny ones...??

**KurtBarlow** · 12-10-2011, 12:56 AM

With the make-up, the hair and the freckles photo-shopped off I think she looks more like Rose McGowan than Lindsay Lohan. They paid $1 million for this?

teabags · 12-10-2011, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pharoahegypt

conclusion...........

great images; shame she had to do them for the bunny mag......

but as per every 'celebrity' bunny shoot of late...... it's too tame (ie no pubic area shot), has way too much airbrushing, uses a way too over used idea (marilyn), and she's so made up it hardly even looks like miss lohan in any case........

..................just my opinion, but one im sure others will share.

finally; anyone else recall the lousy job they did with kelly brook..?? but then she went out and did a shoot for a supposedly lesser mag.. and for far less money.....?? bet everyone has those pix in their collections...... but not the bunny ones...??

i agree with the assessment of the pics, but i still like them..she has a great body glad she's showing it off, pity theyre so tame and look fake kind of, but then thats PB for you, they stopped doing really hot pics i think some time ago for the more fake plasticy looking types.

pasman · 12-10-2011, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtBarlow

With the make-up, the hair and the freckles photo-shopped off I think she looks more like Rose McGowan than Lindsay Lohan. They paid $1 million for this?

Not really the best work! Wonder if a video will accompany the shoot... Some of the celeb shoot do ---

others no...

scottx · 12-10-2011, 03:56 AM

Typical P***b** crap air brushed/ photo shopped, lame MM ripoff..... could of atleast given us a vagina shot!

Blaxninja · 12-10-2011, 04:14 AM

Well even if she had everything air brushed she still looks great....

vanhelsing68 · 12-10-2011, 06:19 AM

Thats the hype of it. Ohh looky at the Lindsay new photo shoot for playboy. She is showing it all. Nothing but a big pile of BS. I think Hugh will regret ever shooting her for his great mag. He is going to loose alot of money on this one. This photo spread wasm't worth a $1 million dollars. If I paid her that kind of money you better believe there would be one or more pussy shots.

12-09-2011, 02:54 PM	#1
arun123 Vintage Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Animal Farm Posts: 513 Thanks: 786 Thanked 14,901 Times in 527 Posts	Lindsay Lohan in Pboy January-February 2012 (1-2—2012) USA* Apologies for the watermarks. Better versions are welcome. __________________ On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

12-10-2011, 12:42 AM	#4
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 3,589 Thanks: 8,428 Thanked 28,701 Times in 3,335 Posts	conclusion........... great images; shame she had to do them for the bunny mag...... but as per every 'celebrity' bunny shoot of late...... it's too tame (ie no pubic area shot), has way too much airbrushing, uses a way too over used idea (marilyn), and she's so made up it hardly even looks like miss lohan in any case........ ..................just my opinion, but one im sure others will share. finally; anyone else recall the lousy job they did with kelly brook..?? but then she went out and did a shoot for a supposedly lesser mag.. and for far less money.....?? bet everyone has those pix in their collections...... but not the bunny ones...?? __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

12-10-2011, 12:56 AM	#5
KurtBarlow Vintage Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Alberta, Canada Posts: 2,642 Thanks: 3,043 Thanked 23,810 Times in 2,635 Posts	With the make-up, the hair and the freckles photo-shopped off I think she looks more like Rose McGowan than Lindsay Lohan. They paid $1 million for this? __________________ The Bible looks like it started out as a game of Mad Libs. - Bill Maher

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-09-2011, 11:27 PM	#2
imtrying Vintage Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,041 Thanks: 10,550 Thanked 13,978 Times in 1,034 Posts	This isn't really a complaint, but hasn't she already done the naked Marilyn shtick for another magazine? Is this her career now, being a Marilyn Monroe impersonator?

12-10-2011, 12:23 AM	#3
flooooo Vintage Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 439 Thanks: 2,443 Thanked 11,370 Times in 463 Posts	well to be onest i think the other one was even more revealing then this uber softcore PB set pitty i was suspecting a better set

12-10-2011, 03:56 AM	#8
scottx Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: New Jersey USA... gotta a problem wit dat? Posts: 54 Thanks: 311 Thanked 323 Times in 46 Posts	Typical P*b crap air brushed/ photo shopped, lame MM ripoff..... could of atleast given us a vagina shot!

12-10-2011, 04:14 AM	#9
Blaxninja Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 1 Thanks: 0 Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post	Well even if she had everything air brushed she still looks great....

12-10-2011, 06:19 AM	#10
vanhelsing68 Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 2 Thanks: 0 Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts	Thats the hype of it. Ohh looky at the Lindsay new photo shoot for playboy. She is showing it all. Nothing but a big pile of BS. I think Hugh will regret ever shooting her for his great mag. He is going to loose alot of money on this one. This photo spread wasm't worth a $1 million dollars. If I paid her that kind of money you better believe there would be one or more pussy shots.