Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > Vintage Erotica
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices
Vintage Erotica Maximum date of the content allowed to be posted here is 1995.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 30th, 2010, 02:57 PM   #1281
Trouser
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 36
Thanks: 536
Thanked 687 Times in 35 Posts
Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+Trouser 2500+
Default

Quote: "imagine being an onlooker when this session was taking place"

Any onlookers would have been in a studio. Does anyone else notice the fake aspect to these, in that they were almost certainly shot in a studio then literally cut and pasted onto a countryside background. They then did a bit of retouching to merge the figure and background together (as best they could in a pre Photoshop era). Much of the black dress is almost entirely painted in by the retoucher. They superimposed studio shot models onto an outdoor background fairly frequently, and it was always easy to spot.
Trouser is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Trouser For This Useful Post:
Old November 30th, 2010, 03:18 PM   #1282
Medium2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 367
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,617 Times in 338 Posts
Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+
Default

Interesting point there, Trouser. The main giveaway is the lighting, which is flat and totally wrong. I've seen a lot worse than this (fingers chopped off, hair at right angles etc) in other places, in the 'old days'.

S & S didn't do this that often. One of the main appeals of the mags were the outside shots, which generally did tend to be taken.....outside.
Medium2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Medium2 For This Useful Post:
Old November 30th, 2010, 03:52 PM   #1283
Knickers1
Vintage Member
 
Knickers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+
Default

You are totally correct Trouser and on reexamination of the pics I posted can see exactly what you mean. Very contrived ! Oh how stupid I feel with my remarks about onlookers. I take consolation in Medium2's remarks that most alfresco sets were genuine. Nick
Knickers1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post:
Old December 1st, 2010, 05:36 PM   #1284
cheech47
Vintage Member
 
cheech47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 609
Thanks: 5,652
Thanked 20,478 Times in 577 Posts
cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+
Default Ann Duke?

I found this image on an old disk and thought it bears a resemblance
to Ann Duke. Clearly a younger version with much longer hair. The shot
looks very much like other studio pics that appear earlier in this thread.




What do you think?

CC
cheech47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to cheech47 For This Useful Post:
Old December 1st, 2010, 05:45 PM   #1285
cheech47
Vintage Member
 
cheech47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 609
Thanks: 5,652
Thanked 20,478 Times in 577 Posts
cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+
Default The "real" Ann Duke

Sorry folks, I meant to add these for comparison.



CC
cheech47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 2nd, 2010, 12:07 AM   #1286
Knickers1
Vintage Member
 
Knickers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+
Default

I don't think the girl in Posting 1314 is Anne Duke. I've seen her in other photo sets under the name of Jackie West. But I could be wrong. Nick
Knickers1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post:
Old December 2nd, 2010, 03:15 PM   #1287
Medium2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 367
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,617 Times in 338 Posts
Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+
Default

I tend to agree that they're different girls. Same location, though.
Medium2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Medium2 For This Useful Post:
Old December 2nd, 2010, 03:24 PM   #1288
cheech47
Vintage Member
 
cheech47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 609
Thanks: 5,652
Thanked 20,478 Times in 577 Posts
cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+cheech47 100000+
Default Nicola Taylor photo locations

First, thanks to Nick for the feedback on Anne Duke and pointing me
in the direction of Jackie West.
I still think it`s possible they are one and the same
given Toco`s habit of giving one model different names.
I`ll have a closer examination and see if I can eliminate or otherwise.

In the meantime, I`ve been following the discussion on whether the location
of some interior shots are at Nicola Taylor`s own house.
I think it`s a distinct possibility and I`d like to take that a step further.
Could Nicola actually be the wife of the photographer or
in other way close to him? I say this as I`ve been looking
more closely at pics of Nicola and Marie Graham for possible image enhancements.
I`ve noticed that Nicola usually looks more poised and
professionally posed than her counterparts who
sometimes look a little awkward and not quite so relaxed.
It`s already been suggested that the other girls might be
friends of Nicola so that could still be the case.

This is getting a little long winded, so I`ll leave it to your thoughts
and later come up with some examples, if you folks are still interested.

Thanks again to all who are keeping the thread alive.

CC
cheech47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to cheech47 For This Useful Post:
Old December 2nd, 2010, 09:43 PM   #1289
JGW
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,654 Times in 1,013 Posts
JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+
Default

Jenny Spencer

JGW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 3rd, 2010, 09:14 AM   #1290
Knickers1
Vintage Member
 
Knickers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+
Default

Featured in Spick 251 was the lovely Sally Fairburn and, new to this thread I believe. Love those lacy pants ! Nick

Knickers1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.