Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Classic Models > Softcore Models > Softcore Models Discussion
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Softcore Models Discussion For all chat and discussions on Vintage Models


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 10th, 2013, 08:49 PM   #21
dang2407
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 7 Posts
dang2407 100+dang2407 100+dang2407 100+dang2407 100+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marialva View Post


I can't believe you guys don't see this: the top half of her pubic hair is real, whereas the lower half has been air-brushed. It is totally different in appearance, it has been blacked out! Surely this visible to someone else??
dang2407 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dang2407 For This Useful Post:
Old April 11th, 2013, 05:42 PM   #22
Marialva
Vintage Member
 
Marialva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 333
Thanks: 19,704
Thanked 13,148 Times in 331 Posts
Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwaidan View Post
Let's remember though. Price was a PM in January of 1981. That means her pics were most likely taken in 1980 sometime, still a time for big hair downstairs. True something looks "not right" in a couple of pics, but I would think for the most part she was natural down there. Just my thoughts.
Her pubic hair seems natural. There are several pictures where the curls are clearly seen. But before considering a photo, we have to take into account some constraints such as the light intensity, the pose of the model or even the model itself. For example, there are PMs hairier than others.


In the pictures above you can see the difference between the pubes of Karen Price (left) and Patricia Farinelli (right). Apparently Karen has thicker and darker hair, but the light and the pose are different, so the question remains.

Off topic: I think Karen start working for PB in September 1980. She was 20, her breasts were too heavy for gymnastics and her father (Ray Price?) suggested her to try an acting career through PB. And so she went to PB.
Marialva is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Marialva For This Useful Post:
Old April 11th, 2013, 05:56 PM   #23
Marialva
Vintage Member
 
Marialva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 333
Thanks: 19,704
Thanked 13,148 Times in 331 Posts
Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dang2407 View Post
I can't believe you guys don't see this: the top half of her pubic hair is real, whereas the lower half has been air-brushed. It is totally different in appearance, it has been blacked out! Surely this visible to someone else??
Yes, and the arm is darker than the belly.

I already saw Roberta's PM Profile Video and she is that hairy on the bottom. The photos I posted before also prove it.
Marialva is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Marialva For This Useful Post:
Old May 14th, 2013, 06:40 PM   #24
skippy1729
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 285
Thanks: 1,313
Thanked 2,907 Times in 261 Posts
skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dang2407 View Post
We know Playboy would airbrush out the good stuff...
I make the first playmate to show lip was Ava Fabian.
I don't know about shaving but a close study of these girls will reveal that there was a vagina lurking in the bushes:

Patti McGuire 11/76
Pamela Jean Bryant 4/78
Teri Nihen 12/83
Justine Grenier 2/84
Liz Stewart 7/84

I prefer bushes with legs wide open to clean shavers with their legs glued together.
skippy1729 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to skippy1729 For This Useful Post:
Old May 20th, 2013, 02:29 PM   #25
Marialva
Vintage Member
 
Marialva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 333
Thanks: 19,704
Thanked 13,148 Times in 331 Posts
Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+
Default

I think the first PM to shave was Marion Scott (May 1956)

Marialva is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Marialva For This Useful Post:
Old May 23rd, 2013, 10:36 PM   #26
treehugger
Vintage Member
 
treehugger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 839
Thanks: 4,646
Thanked 13,675 Times in 824 Posts
treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+treehugger 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dang2407 View Post
I can't believe you guys don't see this: the top half of her pubic hair is real, whereas the lower half has been air-brushed. It is totally different in appearance, it has been blacked out! Surely this visible to someone else??
PB went through a "modesty phase" where they were going back and airbrushing the pubes of some of their images to make them less explicit. Lately they've been undoing that in some of the XL images, I can't think of any off the bat but will try to find some.


Here's an example of PB revisionism, the case of the disappearing Coke can.


treehugger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to treehugger For This Useful Post:
Old May 24th, 2013, 03:32 PM   #27
Marialva
Vintage Member
 
Marialva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 333
Thanks: 19,704
Thanked 13,148 Times in 331 Posts
Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+
Default

I think the revisionism of PB is in the opposite direction. For example, Marianne Gravatte already had her magnificent beaver reduced.

Marialva is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Marialva For This Useful Post:
Old May 31st, 2013, 09:56 PM   #28
dang2407
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 7 Posts
dang2407 100+dang2407 100+dang2407 100+dang2407 100+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marialva View Post
I think the revisionism of PB is in the opposite direction. For example, Marianne Gravatte already had her magnificent beaver reduced.

In actual fact, her huge beaver is made up - it is fiction! Look carefully at the first photo and you can see clearly that the lower part has been added.
dang2407 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to dang2407 For This Useful Post:
Old June 12th, 2013, 02:16 PM   #29
Marialva
Vintage Member
 
Marialva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 333
Thanks: 19,704
Thanked 13,148 Times in 331 Posts
Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dang2407 View Post
In actual fact, her huge beaver is made up - it is fiction! Look carefully at the first photo and you can see clearly that the lower part has been added.
I don't want to be rude, but your insistence in "fake bushes" begins to sound ridiculous. If you have doubts about the authenticity of Marianne Gravatte's beaver, look at her PM Profile Video and clarify your doubts about it.
Marialva is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Marialva For This Useful Post:
Old June 15th, 2013, 05:12 AM   #30
noresore
Vintage Member
 
noresore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 496
Thanks: 6,357
Thanked 12,422 Times in 494 Posts
noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+noresore 50000+
Default Denise McConnell's bush

I have been fiddling around with retouching many of the pictures I have collected and what I have discovered is that the photo dept. have added a lot of "shadows" to many of the pic. Here's Denise McConnell after I have retouched the photos posted earlier in this thread. All I did was "Lighten Shadows" and this is what I got.




Notice that the hair on her head is slightly lighter, probably closer to her natural color and the shadow above her eye disappears revealing her entire face. When you check the pubes, you see she is does not have quite as much pubic hair as the original pics appear to show. There is still a lot of shadows as you get closer to her pussy, but I think this illustrated how the pictures were manipulated. Here is the other one that was posted:



Not as much change as the first pair, however there is a slight difference.

Regardless, Denise McConnell had one fine looking bush!
noresore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.