Lynda Carter ~ Colleen Camp Picture Debate

[maluminse]

notice the camp ring is missing in this one:

[serio02]

A moles, than looks/is a simple blur, against tons of differences (the shirt, the waist, the thorax, the hands, the breasts, the full body. What are we talking now? The picture is totally different, but you say than is another take of the same woman (Colleen)? Or another woman than is not Lynda?
That´s toooooo much!!!

[maluminse]

Its colleen. She has the same mole in the same spot in the same clothes. Picture is very similar as you have already said. Colleen has a mole there and so does the 'lynda' pic. So its not lynda its colleen. The other photo looks real though.

[serio02]

So, Collen improved her breasts, did smaller her waist, changed her shirt and her jeans, became taller, between other thousand body differences, all that between this two pictures. Also, in pictures of better quality, those supposed "moles" disappear.
It´s very evident than they are two different persons!!!

[maluminse]

Originally Posted by serio02

So, Collen improved her breasts, did smaller her waist, changed her shirt and her jeans, became taller, between other thousand body differences, all that between this two pictures. Also, in pictures of better quality, those supposed "moles" disappear.
It´s very evident than they are two different persons!!!

The photos look identical to me except for the face and the mole.

The way to test for fake face is to look for immutable characteristics. scars, moles etc. Its how law enforcement does it. The odds that the other lady and lynda carter has a mole in the same place is what? a million to one?

[serio02]

Originally Posted by maluminse

The photos look identical to me except for the face and the mole.

The way to test for fake face is to look for immutable characteristics. scars, moles etc. Its how law enforcement does it. The odds that the other lady and lynda carter has a mole in the same place is what? a million to one?

What moles!!?? The moles do not exist!!
Identical!!???!! The pose is identical!??!! The shirt looks identical??!!!
I´m sorry, but Your view is indefensible.
I think is useless to exchange ideas with you, because you don´t see (or can´t or want not see) the enormous differences between this two photos.

[Rubinski]

Originally Posted by maluminse

The photos look identical to me except for the face and the mole.

It's obvious that the photos of the bodies here are not identical.
Many differences between these photos have been detailed on this thread already.
Other than the chair and the set, almost every detail is slightly different.
To paste up that many changes in the days before photoshop would have been a lot of work.
Why do it? Just paste in Lynda's head, feather the edges, and be done with it.
Why put in 10 times more hours making all those difficult, but minor changes?

I believe that the Colleen Camp photo was shot to look like the photo of the cast member they were replacing, namely Lynda Carter.
That's why the photos are very similar from a distance, but the fine details do not match.

We've seen Lynda's breasts in an earlier movie. Why is it such a stretch for some people to accept that Lynda would pose for this shot? It was only intended to be a prop, and would only appear in the movie from a distance.
It wasn't intended to be published, and without permission (plus a lot of money), nobody could publish it legally.
So, when the magazine got a copy of the photo under the table, I think they invented the cover story about it being faked, so they could publish it without getting sued.

I think the photo is all Lynda.

[serio02]

Originally Posted by Rubinski

It's obvious that the photos of the bodies here are not identical.
Many differences between these photos have been detailed on this thread already.
Other than the chair and the set, almost every minor detail is slightly different.
To paste up that many changes in the days before photoshop would have been a lot of work.
Why do it? Just paste in Lynda's head, feather the edges, and be done with it.
Why put in 10 times more hours making all those difficult, but minor changes?

I believe that the Colleen Camp photo was shot to look like the photo of the cast member they were replacing, namely Lynda Carter.
That's why the photos are very similar from a distance, but the fine details do not match.

We've seen Lynda's breasts in an earlier movie. Why is it such a stretch for some people to accept that Lynda would pose for this shot? It was only intended to be a prop, and would only appear in the movie from a distance.
It wasn't intended to be published, and without permission (plus a lot of money), nobody could publish it legally.
So, when the magazine got a copy of the photo under the table, I think they invented the cover story about it being faked, so they could publish it without getting sued.

I think the photo is all Lynda.

Absolutely agree. So, look: this is how she showed up in a public event!!, back to those days:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Lyle-Wagoner-Lyn...efaultDomain_0
You almost can see everything...

[maluminse]

Originally Posted by Rubinski

It's obvious that the photos of the bodies here are not identical.
Many differences between these photos have been detailed on this thread already.
Other than the chair and the set, almost every minor detail is slightly different.
To paste up that many changes in the days before photoshop would have been a lot of work.
Why do it? Just paste in Lynda's head, feather the edges, and be done with it.
Why put in 10 times more hours making all those difficult, but minor changes?

I believe that the Colleen Camp photo was shot to look like the photo of the cast member they were replacing, namely Lynda Carter.
That's why the photos are very similar from a distance, but the fine details do not match.

We've seen Lynda's breasts in an earlier movie. Why is it such a stretch for some people to accept that Lynda would pose for this shot? It was only intended to be a prop, and would only appear in the movie from a distance.
It wasn't intended to be published, and without permission (plus a lot of money), nobody could publish it legally.
So, when the magazine got a copy of the photo under the table, I think they invented the cover story about it being faked, so they could publish it without getting sued.

I think the photo is all Lynda.

I one hundred percent believe that Lynda would have posed then topless, she was in a movie topless and the other photo on this thread is her topless.

I also agree camp and carter did similar shoots. However I believe based on the mole which i circled. Yes you cant see it well but its there that this is a camp photo with lyndas head. I mean identical in clothing etc. Also the camp ring is in the carter photo. Nbd though we can agree to disagree.

[clubIman2008]

Sorry i haven't read all of the posts, so someone may have already said this.
But.
If the LC pic is a fake it must be made up of two pics. Linda, presumably clothed, where the head came from. And someone, maybe Colleen, where the body came from. Find those originals and there can be no argument.

As the "faker" must have had found these pics somewhere I'm surprised no one on this board can find them. And if you guys can't find them.... well I don't think they exist.

Just my 2 cents.