Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > General Discussion & News
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
General Discussion & News Want to speak your mind about something ... do it here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 4th, 2012, 04:43 PM   #11
Trintron
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 97
Thanks: 785
Thanked 1,351 Times in 97 Posts
Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+
Default

The complexity of the Tiger tank design was also a issue, all of the extra parts in the gear box, suspension system, engine system, plus the size of the gun made the tank over weight and difficult to manufacture.

Transporting the Tiger Tank to the battlefield was a slow process as well, the tank required a sperate set of narrow transport tracks that required the outer road wheels to be removed and reattached after the tank was transported to the front by train. Then the crew had to take the time to prep the tank for battle by reattaching the wheels and combat tracks before battle.

Still, you can't take anything away from how effective the Tiger I was, the Wermacht still depended on it through out the war. But the Panther is still a better tank hands down, it's the first ancestor of the mondern main battle tank.
Trintron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:02 PM   #12
deefer
Senior Member
 
deefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 146
Thanks: 552
Thanked 2,323 Times in 134 Posts
deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+
Default mine's bigger than yours...

Having the mind set of a five year old, I thought id jump straight into the stupid end of the pool with this the p1500 ratte by Krupp. For those unfamiliar it was a proposed super tank weighing in at 1500 tons carrying 2 800mm main guns, several 128mm secondary guns and a selection of 20 and 30 mm flak guns for self defense. It was to be powered by either 2x8000hp man ship engines or 8x2000hp MAN u-boat engines. By anybodies standards this thing was as big as a ship and probably would have pushed materials technology beyond even the Nazis abilities, but god you'd have papped your self if something twice the height of a maus super tank came rumbling over the hill.




As far as real tanks go, Ive always had a soft spot for the Swedish s-tank. Designed as a defensive tank to stop the pessky russkies from rolling into IKEA land, it had a fixed 105mm gun with an auto loader and to aim it the whole hull was tilted up or down on adjustable suspension or turned left or right on its tracks but it had a total height nearly half that of a conventional tank allowing a very low profile when dug in. Also those vertical grills along the front of the hull are a Swedish version of Kremlin Armour designed to stop AT missiles.



Ive resisted the temptation to put a pick of my volvo up as a tank.
deefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:09 PM   #13
palo5
Former Staff
 
palo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,579
Thanks: 452,836
Thanked 222,654 Times in 16,567 Posts
palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbt42dd View Post
It has a highly successful record in two wars, using a combination of speed, mobility, armor, and deadly weapons system.


Those things need a long logistics tail. Each must be followed by 100 tankers carrying rocket fuel + hamburgers & coke for the crew

But the weapons and optics look good
palo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to palo5 For This Useful Post:
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:17 PM   #14
deefer
Senior Member
 
deefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 146
Thanks: 552
Thanked 2,323 Times in 134 Posts
deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+deefer 10000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Staffsyeoman View Post
Yes, but the longer barrel (nice to see the camouflage on that print, an attempt to disguise it) made it a prime target for tanks and A/T gunners.

Shermans were also known as 'Ronsons' by the British, after a well-known brand of cigarette lighter, whose slogan was 'always lights first time'.
The problem early Sherman's had was the engine was the continental R-975 aircraft engine that ran on avgas and whilst powerful and compact it had a raging thirst meaning they had to carry much more fuel when compared to they're German diesel powered equivalents, and avgas as we all know goes up like a bugger.
deefer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to deefer For This Useful Post:
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:39 PM   #15
Nobody1
Veteran Member
 
Nobody1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,119
Thanks: 16,786
Thanked 22,140 Times in 2,127 Posts
Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uli12345 View Post
Leopard 2 A6 produced by Rheinmetall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41d3mBrMNCc

Sorry, this Video is only in German language available.


Best regards
ULI1234
That's not quite right, uli. The Leo is made at Krauss-Maffei Wegmann GmbH & Co KG. The company Rheinmetall produces the 120 mm smoothbore gun, which is also used in the M1 and other modern battle tanks like the Merkava. The smoothbore gun is produced by many countries under license of Rheinmetall / Rheinmetall Waffe Munition.

Sorry, unfortunately, i have no favorite tank.
Nobody1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Nobody1 For This Useful Post:
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:44 PM   #16
Rendell
Vintage Member
 
Rendell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 590
Thanks: 17,140
Thanked 14,241 Times in 582 Posts
Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trintron View Post
The complexity of the Tiger tank design was also a issue, all of the extra parts in the gear box, suspension system, engine system, plus the size of the gun made the tank over weight and difficult to manufacture.

Transporting the Tiger Tank to the battlefield was a slow process as well, the tank required a sperate set of narrow transport tracks that required the outer road wheels to be removed and reattached after the tank was transported to the front by train. Then the crew had to take the time to prep the tank for battle by reattaching the wheels and combat tracks before battle.

Still, you can't take anything away from how effective the Tiger I was, the Wermacht still depended on it through out the war. But the Panther is still a better tank hands down, it's the first ancestor of the mondern main battle tank.
I would respectfully point out that the Tiger I was Germany's first serious attempt at building a heavy tank and, as a result, many lessons were learned from it. A lot of these lessons would influence the development of the Tiger II as well as that of the Panther G.

Very few nations can get tank design right first time... particularly when they're in the middle of a war!
Rendell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Rendell For This Useful Post:
Old May 4th, 2012, 06:37 PM   #17
Trintron
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 97
Thanks: 785
Thanked 1,351 Times in 97 Posts
Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+Trintron 5000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rendell View Post
I would respectfully point out that the Tiger I was Germany's first serious attempt at building a heavy tank and, as a result, many lessons were learned from it. A lot of these lessons would influence the development of the Tiger II as well as that of the Panther G.

Very few nations can get tank design right first time... particularly when they're in the middle of a war!
I have to agree, the Tiger is quite a technical achievement, when it was first introduced in Russia and North Africa at the time, there was no tank Western or Russian tank that could match the Tiger I's firepower in a head to head fight, especially the range and accuracy of the gun equipped on the Tiger I.
Trintron is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Trintron For This Useful Post:
Old May 4th, 2012, 07:17 PM   #18
Nobody1
Veteran Member
 
Nobody1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,119
Thanks: 16,786
Thanked 22,140 Times in 2,127 Posts
Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+Nobody1 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trintron View Post
I have to agree, the Tiger is quite a technical achievement, when it was first introduced in Russia and North Africa at the time, there was no tank Western or Russian tank that could match the Tiger I's firepower in a head to head fight, especially the range and accuracy of the gun equipped on the Tiger I.
The armor was also good. I once read a story about a tiger which got a hit in the chain system in the middle of a fight. After the hit, the Tiger was just partially maneuverable. The tank commander decided to withdraw from the battle and as a wounded tank, he was naturally a welcome target for numerous enemy tanks and antitank-units. Nevertheless, the commander drove to the nearest repair stop. About 80 km. There, they counted about 120 more hits. This tank was combat-ready the next day.

Unfortunately, i don't know where i've read that story.
Nobody1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Nobody1 For This Useful Post:
Old May 4th, 2012, 07:24 PM   #19
Rendell
Vintage Member
 
Rendell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 590
Thanks: 17,140
Thanked 14,241 Times in 582 Posts
Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+Rendell 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nobody1 View Post
The armor was also good. I once read a story about a tiger which got a hit in the chain system in the middle of a fight. After the hit, the Tiger was just partially maneuverable. The tank commander decided to withdraw from the battle and as a wounded tank, he was naturally a welcome target for numerous enemy tanks and antitank-units. Nevertheless, the commander drove to the nearest repair stop. About 80 km. There, they counted about 120 more hits. This tank was combat-ready the next day.

Unfortunately, i don't know where i've read that story.
I was going to mention this earlier:

From The Army Rumour service website's "ARRSEpedia" entry:

"Gucci Kit
In the 1943 manual which came with the Tiger, the following story must have done much to raise morale.

During a 6 hour combat, a Tiger was hit 227 times, 14 of those 52mm, 11 were 76.2mm. Not one hit penetrated. Its bearings and joints were shot up, 2 axles didn't work, several AT rounds had hit the tracks, it had driven over 3 mines and it STILL continued on for another 60km.

Gucci kit indeed!"
Rendell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Rendell For This Useful Post:
Old May 4th, 2012, 07:27 PM   #20
BigBucket
Vintage Member
 
BigBucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The United Kingdom of Oppressed Peoples.
Posts: 783
Thanks: 5,453
Thanked 11,404 Times in 770 Posts
BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+BigBucket 50000+
Default

Have you guys ever played World of Tanks. The most fun game ever on two tracks! I love tanks too! My faves are the M103 and the Tiger. Shermans are great tanks too!
BigBucket is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to BigBucket For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:23 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.