Softcore models list suggetions

[Staffsyeoman]

That picture has been around for years. Unfortunately I do not have the original, but it was shown that the pic here is a clever bit of manipulation to make it look further in than was the case.

[MrInBetween]

Originally Posted by Staffsyeoman

That picture has been around for years. Unfortunately I do not have the original, but it was shown that the pic here is a clever bit of manipulation to make it look further in than was the case.

If it is a fake, this would be that original. So, did she move her head between the first and second shots, or did someone move it for her later, in Photoshop? I think it's a fake - if nothing else, look at the way the single strands of hair above her right shoulder (camera left) cross in the same way in both pictures. (Apologies for the difference in quality between the two pictures, which makes comparison more difficult.)

[Sirch]

Nice find. I don't think they are the same shot. I enlarged the smaller one and tried to line them up. They won't line up at all.

First I lined up the borders. When that didn't work I ignored the boarders and tried to line up the hand and opposing thumb. Nothing lines up.

Here's an overlay.



Also if that one pic is a "Photoshop" job its damn good. I really don't see any cloning going on there.

So my guess is the "x-rated" shot was an outtake and never used in the magazine. Eventually the whole set was released online.

[Nelberto]

this is the fake (hope its okay to post here??)
you can see where jo's head was cut and pasted by looking at the line on her neck right by her chin

[MrInBetween]

Originally Posted by Nelberto

this is the fake (hope its okay to post here??)
you can see where jo's head was cut and pasted by looking at the line on her neck right by her chin

Picture 1 is the suggested original that I posted.
Picture 2 is the picture in question.
Picture 3 is Nelberto's fake.

I'd originally felt that picture 2 was real, but as I was examining it before making my post above, I changed my mind and decided it was a fake. However, after Sirch's overlay I did some experiments of my own, trying to line up individual sections and started thinking it might be real after all. I think this confirms it: picture 3 is the fake that Staffsyeoman is referring to that has been debunked, and picture 2 is the original of that.

I'm sure we'll all feel happier now.