Why is Peter North so popular on this board? - Page 2

**thecossack** · December 31st, 2010, 06:42 PM

I enjoy the "work" he did before about 1991-2 when he morphed into nothing more than a robotic semen delivery system, driven in total by money.

Before that point in his career: A great physical specimen; hung like a horse; unrivalled cumshot volume; always appeared to have fun doing the partner; showed a respect for those partners; projected a cleancut image; no tats, rings, or long, shaggy hair; shunned "extreme" sex; gave impression of reality in sex scenes. He represents a lot of what I'm not and I can vicariously participate in his adventures. In the tangled darkness of for-profit porn, lying below below the surface he represented, to me through his acting, a lighter, more believeable and realistic essence of sex. It's all an act, but he was a DeNiro, Hanks or Pacino.

**Sharkhunter** · December 31st, 2010, 06:42 PM

I'd say it's pretty self-explanatory. Part of watching b/g porn is putting yourself in the position of the guy - it's not some random cock slamming in and out of that hot chick's mouth/pussy/arse, it's yours. OK, this fails dismally in watching anything with Ron Jeremy in it or where there's too much time spent focussing on the guy's gurning face, but I digress.

The big thing about Peter North - apart from his cock - is his ability to produce loads that more often than not give his target a thorough coating. I always thought I could shoot plenty until I saw his unleash some monster blasts - and that's part of the mystique I guess.

In short, (a) he gets to fuck and cum-shower some of the hottest chicks in the business; (b) he can on occasion shoot up to a dozen individual decent spurts which is in anyone's book pretty amazing - we are not talking about spurt, spurt, dribble here.

**domac80** · January 1st, 2011, 12:24 AM

He's undoubtably the hardest working man in pornography and from all reports a real nice dude. So it comes down to simple probability - since he has appeared in more films than anyone else, it follows that he would receive the most "press".

Just my thoughts.

**burpman** · January 1st, 2011, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damp-patch

What other single thread would cover, as it were, such a variety of good looking women?

As Greenskull said, It doesn't really interest me. But there are certain iconic performers lets say like Tom Byron that are in the "six degrees of....ahem.....bacon" category that from an archivists perspective link up so many women together. You can often use these performers scene pairing info as virtually a who's who of particular eras of erotica.

December 31st, 2010, 06:42 PM	#11
thecossack Vintage Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northwest USA Posts: 2,793 Thanks: 14,084 Thanked 152,438 Times in 2,928 Posts	TOTAL PACKAGE I enjoy the "work" he did before about 1991-2 when he morphed into nothing more than a robotic semen delivery system, driven in total by money. Before that point in his career: A great physical specimen; hung like a horse; unrivalled cumshot volume; always appeared to have fun doing the partner; showed a respect for those partners; projected a cleancut image; no tats, rings, or long, shaggy hair; shunned "extreme" sex; gave impression of reality in sex scenes. He represents a lot of what I'm not and I can vicariously participate in his adventures. In the tangled darkness of for-profit porn, lying below below the surface he represented, to me through his acting, a lighter, more believeable and realistic essence of sex. It's all an act, but he was a DeNiro, Hanks or Pacino.

December 31st, 2010, 06:42 PM	#12
Sharkhunter Gusset Man & Jizzmaster Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Wanking, but not the city in China Posts: 2,043 Thanks: 5,200 Thanked 34,730 Times in 2,027 Posts	I'd say it's pretty self-explanatory. Part of watching b/g porn is putting yourself in the position of the guy - it's not some random cock slamming in and out of that hot chick's mouth/pussy/arse, it's yours. OK, this fails dismally in watching anything with Ron Jeremy in it or where there's too much time spent focussing on the guy's gurning face, but I digress. The big thing about Peter North - apart from his cock - is his ability to produce loads that more often than not give his target a thorough coating. I always thought I could shoot plenty until I saw his unleash some monster blasts - and that's part of the mystique I guess. In short, (a) he gets to fuck and cum-shower some of the hottest chicks in the business; (b) he can on occasion shoot up to a dozen individual decent spurts which is in anyone's book pretty amazing - we are not talking about spurt, spurt, dribble here. __________________ "Birth Control Tip #2431: Shoot your load in a girl's mouth or on her face instead of inside her sweet bits. Result: no expensive burden, stretch marks or saggy tits". To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

January 1st, 2011, 12:24 AM	#13
domac80 Vintage Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 790 Thanks: 983 Thanked 19,497 Times in 792 Posts	He's undoubtably the hardest working man in pornography and from all reports a real nice dude. So it comes down to simple probability - since he has appeared in more films than anyone else, it follows that he would receive the most "press". Just my thoughts.