|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
General Discussion & News Want to speak your mind about something ... do it here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
January 13th, 2016, 07:44 PM | #11 | |||
Gusset Man & Jizzmaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wanking, but not the city in China
Posts: 2,037
Thanks: 5,197
Thanked 34,660 Times in 2,021 Posts
|
Quote:
I remember turning each page hoping to finally see either Jo or Shanine clearly photographed gulping down some man meat. Never happened though! Quote:
I too had my first home internet connection around 1995/96, with a then "fast" 56.6 modem. In addition to backing up my magazines (mainly Pl@b0y special editions like their Book of Lingerie) with digital images, my online hunt was in the main for hardcore - the sort of stuff you couldn't get hold of without having to go into London and down a flight of dodgy stairs. I am sure some of you folks who lived around the London area will remember Lovejoys - within shooting distance of Shaftesbury Avenue - which had a fine selection of military history books on the ground floor and a eye-boggling cornucopia of pornography in the basement - including imported magazines like Private. I remember buying a dodgy VHS copy of Private's Cumshot Deluxe as well - to think the lengths one had to go, eh? Quote:
Around this time I too was only buying mags sporadically, but for this reason has largely given up too. Mayfair was all about big tits and they supplemented their retinue with fake-breasted girls; Club went all "laddish"; Men Only, perhaps the most risqué of the premier PRP titles, took itself down the level of the publisher's second-rate grot like Escort and Razzle, while Mens World went complete crazily transatlantic with a cast of fake-tits and tattoos. Yes, it was rubbish - to think that up until 1997 there were some absolutely cracking magazines that were published. However, this changed - certainly as far was Club was concerned - around late 2002. The new editor seemed to go back to a more traditional "classy" model, and there were no fake breasts to be seen. Tattoos were even airbrushed, with wonderful results such as Natasha Marley looking fresh and fit without her unsightly wrist ink and tramp stamp. Then there was Sophie Moone/Stella - who was, frankly, stellar. It was a cover featuring her and Sandy that got me back into buying the title, and as I kept buying them I was never disappointed. It was then that I decided I was going to keep them all and build a collection - which in turn led to my hunting down older issues on sites like Jobbydealer... Buying mags that rekindled memories from a decade earlier - yes, that decade... the glorious 1990s. Mayfair also turned out some great issues, and Mens World toned down the plastic a lot to the point where some of the covers were really classy again as they were in the mid-1990s. However, the final death knell came around 2009. It took a change of editor and then a change of publisher, and every PRP title pretty much went to pot. Tattoos and fake tits stared appearing with regularity in Club - something the probably alienated its core wankership (I can't say "readership" without guffawing slightly!) Some of the covers bordered on ghastly, and the straw that broken the proverbial camel's back was the installation of the post-boobjob Sasha Cane as the regular girl. Now, Sasha was a real hottie and a girl I actually likes, but after that awful boobjob she was simply hideous. Including inked and fake-titted models in Club was bad enough, but having a girl with nipples that made her chest look like a cross-eyed basset hound was just too much. Unlike the copies from 1998-2001 - which just about passed muster for having a decent percent of good-looking models - those from after 2009 were not worth the then extortionate cover price. £4.50 with some shitty lowcore DVD? They were having a laugh! I gave up on printed porn completely, and would have remained that way were it not for my getting hold of a copy of Barely Legal as part of a bargain stash sometime in 2012. Leafing through the magazine, I found a lovely selection of models who fitted my "type" - mainly flat-chested, attractive, 18-25 types - who didn't dress in pretentious outfits or look fake. Tight t-shirts, thigh-skimming miniskirts, no fake tits, no tattoos... It was like stepping back into the 1990s, but with better production values. There were even models with a healthy smattering of bush. Sweet things with bush! Having been repulsed by a copy of sister magazine Hustler I would never have bought a sealed copy of BL to take home for fear of finding a catalogue of horrors, but was pleasantly surprised by the old school look - obvious when the wankership demographic (according to Wikipedia) is 40-something males still hankering for their youth. I checked out a few PDF versions of the title and the content was pretty consistent, and like magic I was back buying mags again. I set about bringing together back issues taking me back to 2011 (I might dig back further, but copies are so hard to find now, especially on the wrong side of the Atlantic) and have bought every copy since. The coterie of models in BL is nigh-on perfect: most of my online favourites have been featured at some point, which was the final proof that this was the magazine for me. The editors have no desire to start adding silicone-enhanced models or inked chicks to the lineup, and I was even happier to discover that many other girls I would have happily added to my digital collection were it not for their ink made the pages of BL... With the unsightly marks professionally photoshopped out. Happy days.
__________________
"Birth Control Tip #2431: Shoot your load in a girl's mouth or on her face instead of inside her sweet bits. Result: no expensive burden, stretch marks or saggy tits". To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|||
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Sharkhunter For This Useful Post: |
January 13th, 2016, 07:50 PM | #12 | ||
Gusset Man & Jizzmaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wanking, but not the city in China
Posts: 2,037
Thanks: 5,197
Thanked 34,660 Times in 2,021 Posts
|
Quote:
I agree about this golden age, and can wax just as lyrical about it. To go back to the original thrust of the thread, and all that. That said, there are plenty of fine models today, you just need to know where to look! Quote:
__________________
"Birth Control Tip #2431: Shoot your load in a girl's mouth or on her face instead of inside her sweet bits. Result: no expensive burden, stretch marks or saggy tits". To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Sharkhunter For This Useful Post: |
January 13th, 2016, 11:53 PM | #13 |
Grand Vizier
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ruraltania
Posts: 3,219
Thanks: 35,652
Thanked 35,607 Times in 3,210 Posts
|
I was on 56k dialup by the mid-90s (using it was pretty expensive) and as I recall, nearly all the porn was on newsgroups at that time and not too good in terms of quality. No idea if these still exist or how you would access them.
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to CARLTON BROWN For This Useful Post: |
February 18th, 2016, 09:09 AM | #14 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: England, 'Up North!
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 65,934
Thanked 80,759 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
Andrea Clarke, at one time the regular girl in Club could well have been an internet star, had her career been say 10 years later than it was. She was just so damn dirty looking (in a good way), that I think she'd have built up a legion of internet fans. She's best known for softcore, of course (at which she excelled):
However, she was never adverse to a bit of soft-ish sapphic adventures, which always appeal: Occasionally, her forays into lesbianism got a little more exciting, a little more daring, as here, with Sarah Young: Of course, she also did full-strength hardcore - well, at least she did it once: What a girl!
__________________
Girlfan |
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Girlfan For This Useful Post: |
February 18th, 2016, 09:30 AM | #15 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 136
Thanked 10,475 Times in 1,247 Posts
|
Quote:
I had one of those tedious little hand scanners back in the day and scanned what I had and uploaded it. I still see my scans making the rounds some twenty years later. They are small and mediocre quality compared to what is available today but some of the pics have never seen later release so it's my scans or nothing. |
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to LadyLuck For This Useful Post: |
February 18th, 2016, 09:58 AM | #16 |
Porn Archeologist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 92,252
Thanked 241,293 Times in 12,746 Posts
|
If the internet were 10 years ahead i wonder how many models wouldnt have dabbled in harder shoots on the continent?
There were an absolute plethora of amateur models flogging off their sites but few were buying because of the quality. Until broadband came along and made webcam shows possible they were off the radar Cant say i miss the 2001-2005 period with the exception that material thats no longer about keeps turning up from that era via the waybackmachine 1995- The scanners were pretty prolific around then and judging by the scan section they were actually doing a better job than the so called pros back then it was more about swapping not sharing with anyone and everyone Maria Sheriff from 2001 - unknown shoot / site to me It was only when sites like oidsworld popped up and started uploading real content that it became interesting as opposed to frustrating...the copyright police soon put and end to his site Sites like adult check with their 2 tiered system gave porn a bad name imho I can recall being pointed towards alt.binaries.nospam.britishbabes or something like that...not being a collector it seemed a bit too easy no thrill of the chase P2Ps as opposed to torrents were a nightmare if the uploader was on dialup Great old porn sites that are gone. http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...eat+porn+sites Last edited by buttsie; February 18th, 2016 at 10:03 AM.. Reason: adding |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to buttsie For This Useful Post: |
February 18th, 2016, 12:00 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 485
Thanks: 514
Thanked 3,209 Times in 432 Posts
|
Assuming this meant that data storage would have also improved, I would hope that the length of porn scenes would increase. With VHS they wanted to cram as many scenes on the tape as possible so you had scenes that were 10 minutes or less. Such a waste. I don't want to watch eight minutes of foreplay and oral and then a minute and a half of fucking before the cumshot.
__________________
Daydreaming keeps the misanthropy away. Love the country, hate the government. Love the planet, hate the people. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to IronMan For This Useful Post: |
February 18th, 2016, 03:11 PM | #18 |
Gusset Man & Jizzmaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wanking, but not the city in China
Posts: 2,037
Thanks: 5,197
Thanked 34,660 Times in 2,021 Posts
|
Buttsie, spot on mate. Girlfan - couldn't agree more about Andrea Clarke. She wasn't really my type at all, but she clearly had that "look" that shifted neatly between angelic and utterly filthy - had the Internet been around then, she'd have been a major star, for sure.
Then there's the fact that unlike a number of other glamour models in her time she was actually photographed, if just the once, with a cock inside her mouth rather than hovering millimetres away.
__________________
"Birth Control Tip #2431: Shoot your load in a girl's mouth or on her face instead of inside her sweet bits. Result: no expensive burden, stretch marks or saggy tits". To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sharkhunter For This Useful Post: |
May 16th, 2016, 12:30 PM | #19 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: England, 'Up North!
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 65,934
Thanked 80,759 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
Been thinking a lot about Karen White recently. Ludicrously pretty, killer body, and my two person essentials (no tattoos, and a trimmed but unshaven bush). Surely, had the internet started 10 or 15 years earlier, she would have become a global superstar. I can easily imagine myself forking out the required cash each month to subscribe to her (sadly imaginary) site back in say 1995.....
Here's a selection of some Karen White images to remind you. What a girl.....
__________________
Girlfan Last edited by Girlfan; May 16th, 2016 at 12:32 PM.. Reason: Removed image of wrong girl inserted in error |
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Girlfan For This Useful Post: |
May 17th, 2016, 03:59 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 78
Thanks: 370
Thanked 2,240 Times in 68 Posts
|
Quote:
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to swilley06 For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|