|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Help Section If you have technical problems or questions then post or look for answers here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
July 7th, 2017, 01:10 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London
Posts: 37
Thanks: 169
Thanked 603 Times in 35 Posts
|
Checking duplicate images before posting - best way?
I think I've got quite a lot of pictures of girls on existing threads that may not have already been posted.
I'd prefer not to accidentally post duplicates but it's probably quite difficult to check my stock against the thread - say checking 550 pictures vs 500. How do the more prolific posters manage this problem? TIA
__________________
London Man (UK) |
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to london_manuk For This Useful Post: |
|
July 13th, 2017, 08:14 PM | #2 |
Sourcer of Smut
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,829
Thanks: 83,607
Thanked 341,643 Times in 8,422 Posts
|
you could suck the threads using a tool like imagehostgrabber and then compare your pics to the downloaded thread content with Uniquefiler. Search this section for Uniquefiler and you will find a link I posted.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Feel free to post my scans to the relevant model threads, but do give credit |
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Jism Jim For This Useful Post: |
July 13th, 2017, 08:45 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London
Posts: 37
Thanks: 169
Thanked 603 Times in 35 Posts
|
Thanks JJ - much appreciated.
Uniquefiler looks similar to DupeGuru - a duplicate file finder which I've used with a little success, though I'm worried that the initial IHB download may not successfully get all the files in the thread due to server worries. Having said that, I guess we have to be practical and say that this is likely the best solution.
__________________
London Man (UK) |
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to london_manuk For This Useful Post: |
July 14th, 2017, 05:25 PM | #4 |
Sourcer of Smut
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,829
Thanks: 83,607
Thanked 341,643 Times in 8,422 Posts
|
I have tried DupeGuru too. Uniquefiler is lightyears better.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Feel free to post my scans to the relevant model threads, but do give credit |
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Jism Jim For This Useful Post: |
July 16th, 2017, 05:09 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 338
Thanks: 160
Thanked 1,119 Times in 244 Posts
|
I find Awesome Duplicate Photo Finder to be the most accurate image comparison tool:
http://www.duplicate-finder.com/photo.html |
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Rommelbommel For This Useful Post: |
July 16th, 2017, 06:04 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Corner of Rampart & Dumel
Posts: 7,433
Thanks: 51,748
Thanked 204,370 Times in 7,437 Posts
|
I have used Visipics for a long time with good results.
__________________
In olden days a glimpse of stocking was looked on as something shocking... |
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to fragilefranky For This Useful Post: |
July 16th, 2017, 09:45 PM | #7 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Circling Uranus
Posts: 833
Thanks: 77,561
Thanked 16,905 Times in 901 Posts
|
i use SimImages. It is excellent, and keeps a cache of all compared files in a database, so no comparing images again that have been marked as "not wanting to delete although similar."
__________________
View my other posts/gifs on this forum --> To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Midnight Air For This Useful Post: |
September 27th, 2017, 11:12 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 296
Thanks: 6,382
Thanked 4,125 Times in 298 Posts
|
I first categorize the pics as by file size first & keep them as a thumbnail in folder so that I can see the image without having to click it.
I like to create folders for the pics like in hardcore & softcore & seperate them like that, then have blonde section & brunette section.Thats how I can keep up with models I have.I don't like using a program for something like that cause it's just another program that I don't need running while it could degrade how my computer runs (less programs, better performance). |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ButteredUp For This Useful Post: |
September 30th, 2017, 10:24 PM | #9 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,205
Thanks: 47,957
Thanked 83,444 Times in 7,199 Posts
|
Quote:
When it comes to big threads, its more than a bit of a chore for every potential poster to d/l every image to check. But what a board could have -- and it would require someone with some good PHP coding skills-- is to automatically generate a file contain hashes of all the images on the thread; a thread might have gigabytes of pix, but a file containing all the hashes would be tiny, a few megabytes at most. A potential uploader could then check against these hashes to see if his images already existed. . . could build it into any uploader, would be most convenient. A bit like the old CSV file catalogs . . . and its also a bit like what some of the hosts use to defeat piracy, they detect the hash of a file that's already on their banned list and you can't upload it. I don't think anything like this exists at present. . . Last edited by deepsepia; October 1st, 2017 at 04:45 AM.. |
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to deepsepia For This Useful Post: |
October 3rd, 2017, 08:59 AM | #10 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Outskirts of Goosebump City, near the BusbyBerkeleyBakery
Posts: 777
Thanks: 4,712
Thanked 8,847 Times in 754 Posts
|
This one of many = help threads here that prompt me to ask: This is all about file name matching, no? And worst case, it requires exact name match. (I don't know how fuzzy/flexible these programs are.) How practical is it to think filename will be the same? Filenames are changed constantly by hosts & others. And if it's your own new scan you want to check, name match is meaningless.
Is it doing bitmap file analysis/comparison ("Computer Vision") or is it all about text, i.e., filenames?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Please do PM me on any dead links, loading fails, or other issues with host. It will be fixed! |
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ConstantOgler For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|