CSV List - The definitive KK Photo Story, Magazine Story & Film Story data - Page 74

**fannatastic** · November 28th, 2009, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coronablue

I am trying to get my head around the code structure. I'm almost there.

Please see the lines at the beginning of the .SA post.

Useful links:

CC data info
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...&postcount=123

CC mag, film & video codes
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...&postcount=149

.A Actor
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...&postcount=742

.S Shoot
not done yet

.SA Shoot Actor
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...&postcount=733

.M Magazine
not done yet

.MS Magazine Story
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...378#post445378

.F Film
not done yet

.FS Film Story
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...&postcount=473

.V Video
not done yet

.VS Video Story
not done yet

.PS Photoset Story
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...042#post338042

.PA Photoset Actor
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...749#post296749
all data now also in .SA, but still very useful list

.RS Rodox.com Story
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...25&postcount=2

.RT Rodox.com Teaser
http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...94&postcount=3

.RA Rodox.com Actor
now obselete, superseded by .SA

**fannatastic** · November 28th, 2009, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

Is "In Color" really part of the mag series name? Or is it just an addition like "Full Color • Ganz in Farben"? I'm in doubt since I found a scan of the following imprint:

That is a very good question.

Two other scans:

On page 3 it's SEX ORGIES No. X IN COLOR and on page 4 it's just SEX ORGIES. (To complicate things, I have two CC catalogues which call this mag series SEX-ORGIES IN COLOR.)

Assuming that page 4 always has the "proper" name of the mag, then there is a case for using the two-letter code SO for Sex Orgies In Color and dropping the contrived SC code (which I have never liked very much): CC mag, film & video codes

The problem that remains is how to differentiate Sex Orgies In Color 21-28 and the later SexOrgies 21-28? We can't have two SO26s, for example, although we could have SO26 issue 1 and SO26 issue 2. (I can't find any pics of Sex Orgies In Color 28 at the moment, but it's in cccmagfan's list.)

Another interesting point is that early numbered series mag 152 Brutal Sisters is the same as Sex Orgies In Color 27. Did this mag ever have the normal Sex Orgies In Color cartoon cover, I wonder?

Cover and page 3 pics from same mag

**Al Gebra** · November 28th, 2009, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fannatastic

The problem that remains is how to differentiate Sex Orgies In Color 21-28 and the later SexOrgies 21-28? We can't have two SO26s

SexOrgies / SexOrgy is strictly speaking one word.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fannatastic

Naming convention

If name has one word, use first two letters from this word
If there is a conflict or ambiguity, choose a different second letter

SE isn't in use yet but is a common abbreviation of Swedish Erotica; so what about SX?

Quote:

Originally Posted by fannatastic

If name has two words, use first letter from each word

SO would be Sex Orgies (In Color) then. I assume Sex Orgies in cccmag's list is same as Sex Orgies (In Color). In that case the scan of SO7, page 4, I've posted is from a reprint in 1978 (that's what I decipher).

Added:
While we are at it... what is this? I have no imprint, scans are b/w.

**fannatastic** · November 29th, 2009, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

SexOrgies / SexOrgy is strictly speaking one word.

SexOrgies / SexOrgy is strictly speaking two words, stuck together.

Therefore, SO for SexOrgies / SexOrgy is allowed, in the same way as BS for Bestsellers, DG for DreamGirls and SG for SchoolGirls.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

SE isn't in use yet but is a common abbreviation of Swedish Erotica; so what about SX?

There are lots of Sex ... series, so SX would be confusing. And the same is true for SE. I think that a different code other than SO for SexOrgies / SexOrgy would be confusing, too, and unnecessary.

The question is whether to use SO, not SC, for Sex Orgies In Color.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

I assume Sex Orgies in cccmag's list is same as Sex Orgies (In Color).

Yes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

In that case the scan of SO7, page 4, I've posted is from a reprint in 1978 (that's what I decipher).

Actually 1976. Most or all of the series was reissued in that year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Gebra

Added:
While we are at it... what is this? I have no imprint, scans are b/w.

Frankenstein's Monster!

Mutilated head from Sex Orgies and body from Color Climax 12.

**Al Gebra** · November 30th, 2009, 11:09 PM

Another Frankenstein creature (I don't have imprints and dust wrappers)

**BentBastard** · December 3rd, 2009, 12:34 PM

And another, don't recognise the story

btw new .A
.A, F, 'Britt', , , , , CC Classic

http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...cee-model.html

Should we be using the names for .PA as they are listed in .A or the current naming convention used in .PA?
Also weren't you going to specify AKA's as the fourth field your list doesn't appear to be consistent with your format

san73 · December 11th, 2009, 06:05 AM

About Sex Orgies covers.

**icu** · December 11th, 2009, 05:03 PM

I modified the CSV .P to CSV .PS, the format of the listed .P lines inside this thread are obsolete now.
I added this information also to the temporary post #1

grendel · January 14th, 2010, 05:36 PM

I've finally got my database restructured to follow the dot file format. Below are short snippets:

.A, F, Alexa Schiffer, "Rikke, Else", , , , 1997, 2000, 2, Else_AS108.3_face, Rikke_TS88.4_body,
.A, F, 'Alexandra', , , , , 1986, 1987, 0, Alexandra_BC36.1_face, Alexandra_BC36.1_body,
.A, F, 'Alexandra (2)', Alexandra, , , , 1996, 1996, 0, Alexandra_MC70.2_face, Alexandra_MC70.2_body,

Note: I've got some extra fields here: active_from, active_to, rating, and two identification pics. I can easily omit these:-)

On names, the professional_name field is unique. Where identified from, say, EGAFD, the name is something like 'Milada[2] (egafd)'

Also on names, where the actor is only known by an alias (or aliases), I've still included them as many appear in multiple shoots.

.SA, SG1.1, F, 1, 'Charlene', Summer Rose, "Sex, Object:Lollypop up arse", ,
.SA, SG1.1, F, 2, 'Peggy', Susan Hart, Sex, ,
.SA, SG1.2, F, 1, 'Blanka', 'Blanka', Sex, ,
.SA, SG1.3, F, 1, 'Trudi', Veronica Moser, "Anal, Sex", ,
.SA, SG1.4, F, 1, 'Bibi', 'Bibi', Sex, ,
.SA, SG1.4, F, 2, 'Tania', 'Tania (2)', Sex, ,
.SA, SG1.5, F, 1, 'Monica', 'Monica', Sex, ,

Note: format for the sex acts field is a comma separated list of acts. If an act has a description or comment this is added after a colon e.g. "Object:candle up cunt"

.S, <shoot id>, title, location, #females, #males, #shemales, #comments

.S, AS105.1, Two-Hole Dolly, , 1, 2, 0,
.S, AS105.2, Tender Anus, , 1, 2, 0,
.S, AS105.3, Kinky Love, , 1, 2, 0,
.S, AS105.5, Special Game, , 1, 1, 0,
.S, AS106.1, Two Hot Holes, , 1, 2, 0,
.S, AS106.2, Velvet Arse, , 1, 1, 0,
.S, AS106.3, Kinky Fuck, , 1, 2, 0,
.S, AS106.4, Sweet Anus, , 1, 1, 0,

Anyway, I'm now ploughing through endless pages of mismatches between the dot lists here and my database:-(

Example mismatches:

.SA TS36.1: actor 'Bärbel von Staden' matches for index 1 but alias '?' and index 1 expected
.SA TS36.3: actor 'Conny Hundt' and alias 'Camilla' match for index 2 but index 1 expected
.SA TS36.3: actor 'Anne Karna' and alias 'Julie' match for index 1 but index 2 expected
.SA TS37.2: actor 'Nana (2)' matches for index 1 but alias 'Nana' and index 1 expected
.SA TS37.6: actor 'Stacey Donovan' matches for index 1 but alias 'Rose' and index 1 expected
.SA TS38.1: no match found for '.SA, TS38.1, F, 1, '?', Agnes Wankel, , , '
.SA TS38.2: Could not find actor '?'
.SA TS38.4: aka matches index 1 but actor 'Marguerite Nuit' matches index 2
.SA TS38.4: Could not find actor '?'
.SA TS38.6: actor 'Gail Powell' matches for index 1 but alias 'Polly' and index 1 expected
.SA TS39.2: Could not find actor '?'
.SA TS40.2: actor 'Anne Karna' matches for index 1 but alias 'Suzanne' and index 1 expected
.SA TS40.4: Could not find actor '?'
.SA TS40.6: Could not find actor '?'

--- Grendel

**fannatastic** · January 24th, 2010, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BentBastard

Should we be using the names for .PA as they are listed in .A or the current naming convention used in .PA?

The .A names were extracted from the .SA list, which is a combination of the .PA and .RA lists. Some of the names did not match, as they were done by different people, so I had to make a choice about which name to use.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BentBastard

Also weren't you going to specify AKA's as the fourth field your list doesn't appear to be consistent with your format

I think it is consistent, but all the AKAs are blank at the moment.

November 30th, 2009, 11:09 PM	#735
Al Gebra Former Staff Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 11,875 Thanks: 19,210 Thanked 570,912 Times in 11,033 Posts	Another Frankenstein creature (I don't have imprints and dust wrappers) __________________ m Please add source, post complete photo and scan sets - with indexes, if available, preserve genuine file names (that will help to ID sources and model names), thank, credit, and quote original posters. I'm afraid I haven't any time for reuploads. Don't send reports (or PMs) of dead files or requests! Once the files posted above are expired, please help each other, add the info I provided as well. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. -> Underlined words in my posts are clickable. <-

December 3rd, 2009, 12:34 PM	#736
BentBastard Vintage Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 201 Thanks: 198 Thanked 2,442 Times in 106 Posts	And another, don't recognise the story btw new .A .A, F, 'Britt', , , , , CC Classic http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...cee-model.html Should we be using the names for .PA as they are listed in .A or the current naming convention used in .PA? Also weren't you going to specify AKA's as the fourth field your list doesn't appear to be consistent with your format Last edited by BentBastard; December 3rd, 2009 at 12:56 PM.. Reason: Added stuff

December 11th, 2009, 05:03 PM	#738
icu Ups, i did it again Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 2,305 Thanks: 6,077 Thanked 23,962 Times in 2,082 Posts	I modified the CSV .P to CSV .PS, the format of the listed .P lines inside this thread are obsolete now. I added this information also to the temporary post #1 __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

December 11th, 2009, 06:05 AM	#737
san73 Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 61 Thanks: 132 Thanked 1,745 Times in 52 Posts	About Sex Orgies covers.

January 14th, 2010, 05:36 PM	#739
grendel Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 65 Thanks: 5 Thanked 3,818 Times in 59 Posts	I've finally got my database restructured to follow the dot file format. Below are short snippets: .A, F, Alexa Schiffer, "Rikke, Else", , , , 1997, 2000, 2, Else_AS108.3_face, Rikke_TS88.4_body, .A, F, 'Alexandra', , , , , 1986, 1987, 0, Alexandra_BC36.1_face, Alexandra_BC36.1_body, .A, F, 'Alexandra (2)', Alexandra, , , , 1996, 1996, 0, Alexandra_MC70.2_face, Alexandra_MC70.2_body, Note: I've got some extra fields here: active_from, active_to, rating, and two identification pics. I can easily omit these:-) On names, the professional_name field is unique. Where identified from, say, EGAFD, the name is something like 'Milada[2] (egafd)' Also on names, where the actor is only known by an alias (or aliases), I've still included them as many appear in multiple shoots. .SA, SG1.1, F, 1, 'Charlene', Summer Rose, "Sex, Object:Lollypop up arse", , .SA, SG1.1, F, 2, 'Peggy', Susan Hart, Sex, , .SA, SG1.2, F, 1, 'Blanka', 'Blanka', Sex, , .SA, SG1.3, F, 1, 'Trudi', Veronica Moser, "Anal, Sex", , .SA, SG1.4, F, 1, 'Bibi', 'Bibi', Sex, , .SA, SG1.4, F, 2, 'Tania', 'Tania (2)', Sex, , .SA, SG1.5, F, 1, 'Monica', 'Monica', Sex, , Note: format for the sex acts field is a comma separated list of acts. If an act has a description or comment this is added after a colon e.g. "Object:candle up cunt" .S, <shoot id>, title, location, #females, #males, #shemales, #comments .S, AS105.1, Two-Hole Dolly, , 1, 2, 0, .S, AS105.2, Tender Anus, , 1, 2, 0, .S, AS105.3, Kinky Love, , 1, 2, 0, .S, AS105.5, Special Game, , 1, 1, 0, .S, AS106.1, Two Hot Holes, , 1, 2, 0, .S, AS106.2, Velvet Arse, , 1, 1, 0, .S, AS106.3, Kinky Fuck, , 1, 2, 0, .S, AS106.4, Sweet Anus, , 1, 1, 0, Anyway, I'm now ploughing through endless pages of mismatches between the dot lists here and my database:-( Example mismatches: .SA TS36.1: actor 'Bärbel von Staden' matches for index 1 but alias '?' and index 1 expected .SA TS36.3: actor 'Conny Hundt' and alias 'Camilla' match for index 2 but index 1 expected .SA TS36.3: actor 'Anne Karna' and alias 'Julie' match for index 1 but index 2 expected .SA TS37.2: actor 'Nana (2)' matches for index 1 but alias 'Nana' and index 1 expected .SA TS37.6: actor 'Stacey Donovan' matches for index 1 but alias 'Rose' and index 1 expected .SA TS38.1: no match found for '.SA, TS38.1, F, 1, '?', Agnes Wankel, , , ' .SA TS38.2: Could not find actor '?' .SA TS38.4: aka matches index 1 but actor 'Marguerite Nuit' matches index 2 .SA TS38.4: Could not find actor '?' .SA TS38.6: actor 'Gail Powell' matches for index 1 but alias 'Polly' and index 1 expected .SA TS39.2: Could not find actor '?' .SA TS40.2: actor 'Anne Karna' matches for index 1 but alias 'Suzanne' and index 1 expected .SA TS40.4: Could not find actor '?' .SA TS40.6: Could not find actor '?' --- Grendel