|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Help Section If you have technical problems or questions then post or look for answers here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
February 3rd, 2017, 01:04 AM | #12 |
Porn Archeologist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 92,252
Thanked 241,301 Times in 12,746 Posts
|
Some members already reduce as far as they can before quality loss becomes apparent
because of uploading limitations or simply to keep the files available to free downloaders because of filehost restrictions. The TV forums about usually have 3-4 different sizes to cover all bases If you dont have up to date hardware the upper end is waste of bandwidth Theres a good article here talking about the new codec versus the old h264 H265 is reducing the size of files by some margin The cost would seem to be its forward looking H.265 benchmarked: Does the next-generation video codec live up to expectations? By Joel Hruska on July 23, 2013 https://www.extremetech.com/computin...o-expectations |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to buttsie For This Useful Post: |
|
|